바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Relationship between the development of visual span and reading abilities in Korean Hangul reading

Abstract

Various factors influence development and individual differences in reading abilities, including phonological and morphological awareness, working memory, etc. Recent studies reported that in addition to these factors, individual differences in visual span, which is defined as the number of letters accurately recognized within very short period of time, without moving eyes, also contribute to differences in reading fluency. However, no studies thus far have attempted to measure visual span in Korean Hangul reading, a unique writing system that combines consonants and vowels into given spaces based on syllabary. The present study measured visual span of 2nd, 4th, 6th grade and adult Korean readers, using trigram paradigm, and examined whether individual differences in visual span relates to reading abilities. The results showed that indeed, visual span differences contribute to reading abilities, suggesting that this relationship holds in the development of reading Korean Hangul.

keywords
Submission Date
2015-10-15
Revised Date
2015-12-08
Accepted Date
2015-12-09

Reference

1.

고선희, 최경순, 황민아 (2009). 읽기 폭 과제로 측정한 정상아동의 작업기억 발달. 언어청각장애연구, 2009, 14, 303-312.

2.

김동일, (2008). 기초학습기능 수행평가체제(BASA): 읽기검사. 서울: 학지사심리검사연구소.

3.

김애화, 김의정, 성소연 (2013). 초등학교 1, 3, 5 학년 학생의 읽기이해 특성 연구: 상위읽기이해 처리 특성을 중심으로. 초등교육연구, 26(3), 21-42.

4.

박순길, 조증열, 유영미 (2013). 읽기 부진 아동의 문식성 예언변인 연구. 특수교육, 12(1), 155-180.

5.

박진원, 신명선 (2012). 속화성인과 일반성인의읽기 난이도에 따른 읽기 유창성과 읽기오류 비교. 특수교육저널: 이론과 실천, 13(1), 145-164.

6.

안성우, 서유경, 김유 (2011). 작업기억의 발달에 대한 실증적연구-음운기억과 중앙집행기 발달을 중심으로. 언어치료연구, 20(1), 69-85.

7.

안제원, 방희정, 박현정 (2013). 초등학교 고학년 아동의 빠른 이름대기 및 실행기능과읽기능력 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 26(1), 85-102.

8.

이병택, 김경중, 조명한 (1996). 읽기폭에 따르는 언어처리의 개인차: 작업기억과 언어이해. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 8(1), 59-85.

9.

이임숙, 조증열 (2003). 초등학생의 읽기와 인지-언어적 변인들과의 인과적 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 16(4), 211-225.

10.

주나래, 최영은, 조증열 (2015). 초기 한글 읽기 발달에서 실행 기능의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28(2), 125-144.

11.

조증열 (2015). 읽기 쓰기 학습부진 아동의 현황과 특성. 난독증 원탁회의 IX 자료집, 2015(2), 23-32.

12.

조증열 (2011). 초등 중학년의 한글 문식성 발달에 대한 인지심리학적 이해. 한국초등국어교육, 45(45), 335-350.

13.

Brabham, E., Boyd, P., & Edgington, W. D. (2000). Sorting it out: Elementary students'responses to fact and fiction in informational storybooks as read‐alouds for science and social studies. Literacy Research and Instruction, 39(4), 265-289.

14.

Becker, D. R., Miao, A., Duncan, R., & McClelland, M. M. (2014). Behavioral self-regulation and executive function both predict visuomotor skills and early academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 411-424.

15.

Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child development, 78(2), 647-663.

16.

Borella, E., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 86-92.

17.

Burg, A. (1966). Visual acuity as measured by dynamic and static test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 460-466.

18.

Burg, A. (1968). Lateral visual field as related to age and sex. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 10-15.

19.

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability:Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of educational psychology, 96(1), 31.

20.

Cartwright, N. (2002). Against modularity, the causal Markov condition, and any link between the two: comments on Hausman and Woodward. The British journal for the philosophy of science, 53(3), 411-453.

21.

Cartwright, K. B., Marshall, T. R., Dandy, K. L., & Isaac, M. C. (2010). The development of graphophonological-semantic cognitive flexibility and its contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(1), 61-85.

22.

Cho, J. R., & McBride-Chang, C. (2005). Correlates of Korean Hangul acquisition among kindergartners and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(1), 3-16.

23.

Chung, K. K., & McBride-Chang, C. (2011). Executive functioning skills uniquely predict Chinese word reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 909.

24.

Colé, P., Duncan, L. G., & Blaye, A. (2014). Cognitive flexibility predicts early reading skills. Frontiers in psychology, 5.

25.

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 19(4), 450-466.

26.

Daneman, M., & Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined. In M. Coltheart(Ed.), Attention and performance XII:The psychology of reading (pp. 491-508). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

27.

Dixon, P., LeFevre, J. A., & Twilley, L. C. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill. Journal of educational psychology, 80(4), 465.

28.

Foy, J. G., & Mann, V. A. (2013). Executive function and early reading skills. Reading and Writing, 26(3), 453-472.

29.

Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., & Steele, J. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world:two new school readiness indicators. Developmental psychology, 46(5), 1008.

30.

Ginsburg, N., Jurenovskis, M., & Jamieson, J. (1982). Sex differences in critical flicker frequency. Perceptual and motor skills, 54(3c), 1079-1082.

31.

Jackson, N. E., Chen, H., Goldsberry, L., Kim, A., & Vanderwerff, C. (1999). Effects of variations in orthographic information on Asian and American readers' English text reading. Reading and Writing, 11(4), 345-379.

32.

Kieffer, M. J., Vukovic, R. K., & Berry, D. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth‐grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 333-348.

33.

Kim, Y. S. (2011). Proximal and distal predictors of reading comprehension: Evidence from young Korean readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(2), 167-190.

34.

Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

35.

Kwon, M., Legge, G. E., & Dubbels, B. R. (2007). Developmental changes in the visual span for reading. Vision research, 47(22), 2889-2900.

36.

Lee, H. W., Kwon, M., Legge, G. E., & Gefroh, J. J. (2010). Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: Is it due to attention?. Journal of vision, 10(6), 18.

37.

Legge, G. E., Ahn, S. J., Klitz, T. S., & Luebker, A. (1997). Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision. Vision Research, 37(14), 1999-2010.

38.

Legge, G. E., Cheung, S. H., Yu, D., Chung, S. T., Lee, H. W., & Owens, D. P. (2007). The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.Journal of Vision, 7(2), 9.

39.

Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., & Chung, S. T. (2001). Psychophysics of reading: XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision research, 41(6), 725-743.

40.

McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J. R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., & Muse, A. (2005). Changing models across cultures:Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of experimental child psychology, 92(2), 140-160.

41.

Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child development, 973-980.

42.

Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Information-processing theories of development. Children’s thinking, 65-106.

43.

Stahl, S. (1983). Differential word knowledge and reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 15(4), 33-50.

44.

Wang, H., He, X., & Legge, G. E. (2014). Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. Journal of vision, 14(8), 6.

45.

Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129-149.

logo