바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Three-year-olds’ inferences of speakers’ mental states using disfluency in speech

Abstract

Disfluencies (i.e., pauses, insertions, repetition and replacement of words, phrases, or sentences) are common in speech. Disfluencies provide several interpretations about a speaker depending on the context. The present study examined: 1) acoustic characteristics of disfluent phrases—especially those that mark hesitation—compared to those fluent phrases with the exact same words and 2) whether 3-year-olds are able to infer a speaker’s mental states using disfluencies. The disfluent “uh” that shows speakers’ hesitation was longer and lower-pitched than the fluent “uh” that indicates speakers’ positive responses. In a food/snack offering situation, experimenter asked two adults about their preferences for the item. One answered with hesitation “uh” while the other answered fluently without hesitation. Three-year-olds reliably selected the speakers who answered without hesitation as the recipient of the offered item. It indicates that 3-year-olds are sensitive to the subtle differences in speech and utilized the hesitation marker to infer speakers’ mental states.

keywords
Submission Date
2015-10-15
Revised Date
2015-11-30
Accepted Date
2015-12-09

Reference

1.

김순자, 이필영. (2005). 담화 표지의 습득과발달. 국어교육, 118, 149-180.

2.

김영철. (2006). 국어 담화표지 ‘어’의 고찰. 국어문학, 41, 249-266.

3.

남길임. (2011). 담화 유형에 따른 한국어 비유창성 현상 연구. 담화와인지, 18(3), 115-138.

4.

윤혜련, & 김영태. (2004). 성별에 따른 영유아언어발달의 특성 연구: SELSI 를 중심으로. 언어청각장애연구, 9(1), 30-44.

5.

Arnold, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible. In E. Gibson & N. J. Pearlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (197-217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

6.

Arnold, J. E., Fagnano, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 25-36.

7.

Arnold, J. E., Kam, C. L. H., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 914-930

8.

Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. J., & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new disfluency and reference resolution. Psychological Science, 15(9), 578-582.

9.

Berman, J. M., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2010). Preschoolers’ appreciation of speaker vocal affect as a cue to referential intent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(2), 87-99.

10.

Blasi, A., Mercure, E., Lloyd-Fox, S., Thomson, A., Brammer, M., Sauter, D., Deeley, Q., Barker, G. J., Renvall, V., Deoni, S., Gasston, D., Williams, S. C., Johnson, M. H., Simmons, A., & Murphy, D. G. (2011). Early specialization for voice and emotion processing in the infant brain. Current Biology, 21(14), 1220-1224.

11.

Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (2004). Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Language, 24(3), 267-304.

12.

Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of Another’ s Knowing: prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 383-398.

13.

Cheng, Y., Lee, S. Y., Chen, H. Y., Wang, P. Y., & Decety, J. (2012). Voice and emotion processing in the human neonatal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1411-1419.

14.

Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73-111.

15.

Dibble, J. L., Wisner, A. M., Dobbins, L., Cacal, M., Taniguchi, E., Peyton, A., Raalte, L., & Kubulins, A. (2013). Hesitation to share bad news: Byproduct of verbal message planning or functional communication behavior? Communication Research. 42(2), 213-236.

16.

Eklund, R., & Shriberg, E. (1998). Crosslinguistic dis¯uency modeling: a comparative analysis of Swedish and American English human-human and human-machine dialogues. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, vol. 6, 2631-2634. Sydney:Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.

17.

Eriksson, M., Marschik, P. B., Tulviste, T., Almgren, M., Pérez Pereira, M., Wehberg, S., Marjanovič-Umek, L., Gayraud, F., Kovacevic, M., & Gallego, C. (2012). Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills:Evidence from 10 language communities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 326-343.

18.

Fernald, A. (1993). Approval and disapproval:Infant responsiveness to vocal affect in familiar and unfamiliar languages. Child Development, 64(3), 657-674.

19.

Flom, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2007). The development of infant discrimination of affect in multimodal and unimodal stimulation: The role of intersensory redundancy. Developmental Psychology, 43(1), 238-252.

20.

Friend, M. (2000). Developmental changes in sensitivity to vocal paralanguage. Developmental Science, 3(2), 148-162.

21.

Gil, S., Aguert, M., Le Bigot, L., Lacroix, A., & Laval, V. (2014). Children’s understanding of others’ emotional states: Inferences from extralinguistic or paralinguistic cues? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(6), 539-549.

22.

Grossmann, T., Striano, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Infants' electric brain responses to emotional prosody. NeuroReport, 16(16), 1825-1828.

23.

Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 845-857.

24.

Kam, C. L. H., & Edwards, N. A. (2008). The use of uh and um by 3-and 4-year-old native English-speaking children: Not quite right but not completely wrong. First Language, 28(3), 313-327.

25.

Kidd, C., White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers’ referential intentions. Developmental Science, 14(4), 925-934.

26.

Lindsey, A. E., Greene, J. O., Parker, R. G., & Sassi, M. (1995). Effects of advance message formulation on message encoding: Evidence of cognitively based hesitation in the production of multiple‐goal messages. Communication Quarterly, 43(3), 320-331.

27.

Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.

28.

McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 424-453.

29.

Morton, J. B., & Trehub, S. E. (2001). Children's understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development, 72(3), 834-843.

30.

Quam, C., & Swingley, D. (2012). Development in children’s interpretation of pitch cues to emotions. Child Development, 83(1), 236-250.

31.

Repacholi, B. M., & Gopnik, A. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14-and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 12-21.

32.

Sakkalou, E., & Gattis, M. (2012). Infants infer intentions from prosody. Cognitive Development , 27(1), 1-16.

33.

Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(2), 228-233.

34.

Shriberg, E. (1996). Disfluencies in Switchboard. Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP ’96), Vol. Addendum, 11-14. Philadelphia. PA.

logo