open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0718
The present study investigated children’s ability to employ probabilistic thinking in a task involving sequential events. In the sequential probability task (SPT), two boxes were presented in each trial and participants had to choose the one that had a higher probability of getting a reward. SPT designed three stages with different probabilities, and each stage comprised 15 trials. Our results indicate that even preschool children could employ probabilistic thinking based on their experiences in sequential events. Interestingly, participants as young as 3years old children tended to select more frequently the box with a higher probability of get rewards across the trials of the sequential probability task.
김미숙, 이정욱 (2011). 실험적 확률활동이 유아의 확률적 사고에 미치는 영향. 한국유아교육학회 정기학술발표논문집, 2011(단일호), 149-149.
김미숙, 이정욱 (2012). 실험적 확률활동을 통한 유아의 확률적 사고변화 탐구. 유아교육연구, 32(4), 279-309.
이정욱, 김인아 (2007). 유아의 확률적 사고에관한 연구. 유아교육연구, 27(3), 337-353.
정윤경 (2005). 비율 추론 능력의 발달. 한국심리학회지 발달, 18(4), 109-127.
정윤경 (2009). 비율 추론을 중심으로 본 아동기 형식적-비형식적 양적 추론 체계의 발달. 한국심리학회지 발달, 22(3), 169-182.
Acredolo, C., O’Connor, J., Banks, L.,&Horobin, K. (1989). Children’s ability to make probability estimates: Skills revealed through application of Anderson’s functional measurement methodology, Child Development, 60(4), 933-945.
Anderson, N. H. (2014). Contributions To Information Integration Theory: Volume 1:Cognition. Psychology Press.
Anderson, N., & Wilkening, F. (1991). Adaptive thinking in intuitive physics. CIn N. H. Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory: Vol. III. Developmental (pp. 1-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Boyer, T. W. (2007). Decision-making processes:Sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97(1), 28-43.
Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review (full report). A report to the Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved on 1/1/2013 from:<http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Nuffield_CuP_FULL_REPORTv_FINAL.pdf>.
Buchsbaum, D., Gopnik, A., Griffiths, T. L., & Shafto, P. (2011). Children’s imitation of causal action sequences is influenced by statistical and pedagogical evidence. Cognition, 120(3), 331-340
Cox, R. T. (1946). Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation. American Journal of Physics, 14(1), 1-13.
Denison, S., & Xu, F. (2014). The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants. Cognition, 130(3), 335-347.
Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(05), 735-808.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). Dual system theories of cognition: Some issues. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 202-207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(1), 1-24.
Gelman, R. (1991). Epigenetic foundations of knowledge structures: Initial and transcendent constructions. In S. Carey and R. Gelman, (Eds.). The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. (pp. 293-322).
Girotto, V., & Gonzalez, M. (2008). Children’s understanding of posterior probability. Cognition, 106(1), 325-344.
Heckhausen, H. (1982). The development of achievement motivation. Review of Child Development Research, 6, 600-668.
Jeong, Y., Levine, S. C., &Huttenlocher, J. (2007). The development of proportional reasoning:Effect of continuous versus discrete quantities. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(2), 237-256.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origins of the idea of chance in children. New York: Norton.
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1994). The origins of probability judgment: a review of data and theories. In Wright, George &Ayton, Peter (Ed), Subjective Probability. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Schlottmann, A. (2001). Children's probability intuitions: Understanding the expected value of complex gambles. Child Development, 72(1), 103-122.
Schlottmann, A., & Anderson, N. H. (1994). Children's judgments of expected value. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 56.
Schneider, K., Hanne, K., & Lehmann, B. (1989). The development of children's achievementrelated expectancies and subjective uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47(1), 160-174.
Singer, J. A., & Resnick, L. B. (1992). Representations of proportional relationships:Are children part-part or part-whole reasoners?. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(3), 231-246.
Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. (pp.379-396). New York:Cambridge University Press.
Slone, L. K., & Johnson, S. P. (2015). Infants’statistical learning: 2-and 5-month-olds’segmentation of continuous visual sequences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 133, 47-56.
Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot's rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Surber, C. F., & Haines, B. A. (1987). The growth of proportional reasoning:Methodological issues. Annals of Child Development, 4, 35-87.
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive psychology, 63(3), 107-140.
Weiner, B. (1991). Metaphors in motivation and attribution. American Psychologist, 46(9), 921.