open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0718
The goal of the present study was to investigate the effect of category label, properties and visual appearance on children’s reasoning during inductive inference and categorization. A property inference task and a categorization task were used to examine the effects of category label and properties. The results based on the data collected from 71 4-and 5-year-old children and 20 adults indicated that the participants’ reasoning was more category-based during the property inference task than during the categorization task. However, this tendency was not significant when the properties were highly familiar. Perceptual cues played a strong role in the categorization task when categorizing arbitrary categories compared to natural categories, but this was not the case during the property inference task. The results also showed that older participants tended to use conceptual information (category labels and properties) more than did younger participants, regardless of tasks and domains. These findings indicate that category labels have higher inductive potential compared to properties in human reasoning, and that even young children may consider conceptual information as main information that may override other factors, such as perceptual similarity.
김진욱, 이순형 (2009). 명칭의 음운적 유사성및 친숙성에 따른 4세 유아의 속성 귀납추론. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 22(4), 73-89.
성현란 (1989). 학령전 아동에서의 자연범주와귀납적 추론. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 2(1), 18-31.
우남희 (1994). 학령전 아동의 사람 범주화(person categorization)의 발달. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 7(1), 137-150.
Baldwin, D. A. (1992). Clarifying the role of shape in children's taxonomic assumption. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54(3), 392-416.
Birnbaum, D., Deeb, I., Segall, G., Ben‐Eliyahu, A., & Diesendruck, G. (2010). The development of social essentialism: The case of Israeli children’s inferences about Jews and Arabs. Child Development, 81(3), 757-777.
Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60(1), 1-29.
Brandone, A. C., & Gelman, S. A. (2013). Generic language use reveals domain differences in young children's expectations about animal and artifact categories. Cognitive development, 28(1), 63-75.
Boyer, T. W., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Development of proportional reasoning:where young children go wrong. Developmental psychology, 44(5), 1478.
Deak, G. O., & Bauer, P. J. (1996). The dynamics of preschoolers' categorization choices. Child development, 67(3), 740-767.
del Rio, M. F., & Strasser, K. (2011). Chilean children's essentialist reasoning about poverty. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 722-743.
Diesendruck, G., & Eldror, E. (2011). What children infer from social categories. Cognitive Development, 26(2), 118-126.
Diesendruck, G., Gelman, S. A., & Lebowitz, K. (1998). Conceptual and linguistic biases in children's word learning. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 823.
Diesendruck, G., Goldfein‐Elbaz, R., Rhodes, M., Gelman, S., & Neumark, N. (2013). Cross‐Cultural Differences in Children's Beliefs About the Objectivity of Social Categories. Child development, 84(6), 1906-1917.
Diesendruck, G., & haLevi, H. (2006). The Role of Language, Appearance, and Culture in Children's Social Category‐Based Induction. Child Development, 77(3), 539-553.
Diesendruck, G., & Peretz, S. (2013). Domain differences in the weights of perceptual and conceptual information in children’s categorization. Developmental psychology, 49(12), 2383.
Diesendruck, G., & Weiss, E. (2015). Children's differential weighting of cues to social categories. Cognitive Development, 33, 56-72.
Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance-reality distinction. Cognitive psychology, 15(1), 95-120.
Gelman, S. A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive psychology, 20(1), 65-95.
Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press, USA.
Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird:Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental psychology, 26(5), 796.
Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1991). Language and categorization: The acquisition of natural kind terms. Perspectives on language and thought:Interrelations in development, 146-196.
Gelman, S. A., Collman, P., & Maccoby, E. E. (1986). Inferring Properties from Categories versus Inferring Categories from Properties:The Case of Gender. Child Development, 57(2), 396-404.
Gelman, S. A., & Davidson, N. S. (2013). Conceptual influences on category - based induction. Cognitive Psychology, 66(3), 327-353.
Gelman, S. A., & Gottfried, G. M. (1996). Children's causal explanations of animate and inanimate motion. Child Development, 1970-1987.
Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23(3), 183-209.
Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38(3), 213-244.
Gentner, D., & Imai, M. (1995). A further examination of the shape bias in early word learning. Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Child Language Research Forum. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA (pp. 167-176).
Gopnik, A., & Sobel, D. M. (2000). Detecting blickets: How young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child development, 71(5), 1205-1222.
Gottfried, G. M., & Gelman, S. A. (2005). Developing domain-specific causal- explanatory frameworks: The role of insides and immanence. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 137-158.
Heyman, G. D., & Gelman, S. A. (2000a). Preschool children's use of novel predicates to make inductive inferences about people. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 263-280.
Heyman, G. D., & Gelman, S. A. (2000b). Preschool children's use of trait labels to make inductive inferences. Journal of experimental child psychology, 77(1), 1-19.
Imai, M. (1995). Asymmetry in the taxonomic assumption: word learning vs. property induction. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 157-166). CSLI Stanford.
Imai, M., Gentner, D., & Uchida, N. (1994). Children's theories of word meaning: The role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9(1), 45-75.
Jaswal, V. K., & Markman, E. M. (2007). Looks aren't everything: 24-month- olds' willingness to accept unexpected labels. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(1), 93-111.
Kemler Nelson, D. G., Russell, R., Duke, N., & Jones, K. (2000). Two‐year‐olds will name artifacts by their functions. Child development, 71(5), 1271-1288.
Noles, N. S., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: a critical analysis of similarity-based approaches. Developmental psychology, 48(3), 890.
Rosengren, K. S., Gelman, S. A., Kalish, C. W., & McCormick, M. (1991). As time goes by:Children's early understanding of growth in animals. Child Development, 62(6), 1302-1320.
Saalbach, H., & Imai, M. (2006). Categorization, label extension, and inductive reasoning in Chinese and German preschoolers: Influence of a classifier system and universal cognitive constraints. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 703-708). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Shipley, E. F. (1993). Categories, hierarchies, and induction. The psychology of learning and motivation, 30, 265-301.
Sloutsky, V. M., & Fisher, A. V. (2004). Induction and categorization in young children: a similarity-based model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 166.
Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., & Landau, B. (1996). Naming in young children: A dumb attentional mechanism?. Cognition, 60(2), 143-171.
Taylor, M. G., Rhodes, M., & Gelman, S. A. (2009). Boys will be boys; cows will be cows: Children’s essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species. Child Development, 80(2), 461-481.