바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

수치심이 과시적 소비에 미치는 영향: 사회적 자아존중감과 자아 변화 기대의 매개효과

Shame and Conspicuous Consumption: Choosing Loud Logos as an Ego-protective Behavior

초록

본 연구는 수치심이라는 자의식적 감정이 소비 맥락에서 어떻게 발현되는가를 탐구하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 수치심을 경험한 개인은 사회적인 자아 정체성이 위협받고 손상되는 듯한 기분을 느끼게 되며 자신을 위축되게 지각하는 경향을 보인다. 따라서 수치심이 유발되면 일시적으로 사회적 자아존중감이 낮아지게 되는데, 이렇게 작아진 사회적 자아를 회복하는 대체적인 자기 방어적 행위이자 더 나은 자아로 변모하기 위한 수단으로써 과시적인 소비가 이루어질 것이라고 가설을 세우고 연구를 진행하였다. 연구 1에서는 기질적인 수준의 수치심 경향성이 과시적 소비를 유발하는 데 있어 정적인 영향력을 발휘한다는 것을 보인 한편, 이들의 관계를 자아 변화 기대가 유의미하게 매개한다는 것을 밝혔다. 또한 기질적인 수준의 수치심에서 한 걸음 나아가 조작으로 점화된 수치심이 과시적 소비에 미치는 영향력을 살펴봄으로써 인과 관계를 검증하기 위해 연구 2를 진행하였다. 그 결과 경로 분석을 통해 수치심이 과시적 소비에 미치는 간접 효과의 통계적 유의성을 검증하였다. 구체적으로는, 수치심으로 인해 유발된 사회적 자아존중감의 저하가 소비에 대한 자아 변화 기대를 증폭시킴으로써 과시적인 소비가 발생하게 된다는 것을 밝혔다. 일반적으로 특정 감정으로 인해 발생하는 행동적인 경향은 소비 맥락에서도 동일한 방향으로 나타나지만, 이와 달리 본 연구에서는 수치심이 갖는 독특한 특성에 주목하여 자신을 숨기거나 사회적인 상호작용으로부터 멀어지려는 수치심의 일반적인 행동적 특성과는 정반대의 양상, 즉 자신을 드러내고자 하는 욕구가 소비 맥락에서 발생할 수 있음을 보였다는 데 그 의의가 있다.

keywords
수치심, 사회적 자아존중감, 자아 변화 기대, 과시적 소비, shame, social state self-esteem, self transformation expectations, conspicuous consumption, complementary consumption

Abstract

Previous research showed that when people feel a sense of shame, they tend to seek a complementary ego-protective remedy to repair their threatened self-concept. The goal of this study is to identify behavioral tendencies of ashamed people in a consumption context. We hypothesized that shame induces conspicuous consumption in order to restore threatened social self. With the results of study 1, we found initial evidence that trait shame can positively predict conspicuous consumption. Additionally, results for the study 2 revealed that the participants who recalled a shameful experience showed significantly lower level of social state self-esteem, higher level of self transformation expectations, and thus tended to have more willingness to be engaged in conspicuous consumption than control groups. Preacher and Hayes' (2004) bootstrapping mediation analysis confirmed that shame had indirect effects on conspicuous consumption. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for the future researches are discussed.

keywords
shame, social state self-esteem, self transformation expectations, conspicuous consumption, complementary consumption

참고문헌

1.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

2.

Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5-33.

3.

Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 229-237.

4.

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.

5.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

6.

Braun, O. L., & Wicklund, R. A. (1989). Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 161-187.

7.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

8.

Chao, Y., Cheng, Y., & Chiou, W. (2011). The psychological consequence of experiencing shame: Self-sufficiency and mood-repair. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 202-210.

9.

Chao, Y., Yang, C., & Chiou, W. (2012). Food as ego-protective remedy for people experiencing shame. Experimental evidence for a new perspective on weight-related shame. Appetite, 59, 570-575.

10.

Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 947-966.

11.

Cryder, C. E., Lerner, J. S., Gross, J. J., & Dahl, R. E. (2008). Misery is not miserly: Sad and self-focused individuals spend more. Psychological Science, 19, 525-530.

12.

de Hooge, I. E., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 933-943.

13.

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129.

14.

Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343- 373.

15.

Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action rediness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228.

17.

Gao, L., Wheeler, S. C., & Shiv, B. (2009). The “shaken self”: Product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 29-38.

18.

Gilbert, P. (1997). The evolution of social attractiveness and its role in shame, humiliation, guilt and therapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70, 113-147.

19.

Gilligan, J. (2003). Shame, guilt, and violence. Social Research, 70, 1149-1180.

20.

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85-102.

21.

Han, Y., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74, 15-30.

22.

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.

23.

Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J., & Myers, T. A. (2010). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques. New York: Routledge.

24.

Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.

25.

Keltner, D., & Buswell, B. N. (1996). Evidence for the distinctness of embarrassment, shame, and guilt: A study of recalled antecedents and facial expressions of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 155-171.

26.

Kemeny, M. E., Gruenewald, T. L., & Dickerson, S. S. (2004). Shame as the emotional response to threat to the social self: Implications for behavior, physiology, and health. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 153-160.

27.

Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risking-taking, and self regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1250-1267.

28.

Lee, C., & Andrade, E. B. (2011). Fear, social projection, and financial decision making. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 121-129.

29.

Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 530-544.

30.

Lerner, J., Small, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337-341.

31.

Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. New York: International Universities Press.

32.

Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292.

33.

Lutwak, N., Ferrarib, J. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1998). Shame, guilt, and identity in men and women: The role of identity orientation and processing style in moral affects. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(6), 1027-1036.

34.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717- 731.

35.

Richins, M. L. (2011). Materialism, transformation expectations, and spending: Implications for credit use. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 30, 141-156.

36.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

37.

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 257-267.

38.

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 549-555.

39.

Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In T. E. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.

40.

Shrum, L. J., Wong, N., Arif, F., Chugani, S. K., Gunz, A., Lowrey, T. M., Nairn, A., Pandelaere, M., Ross, S., Ruvio, A., Scott, K., & Sundie, J. (2012). Reconceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1179-1185.

41.

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.

42.

Tangney, J. P. (1992). Situational determinants of shame and guilt in young adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 199-206.

43.

Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.

44.

Tangney, J. P., & Fischer, K. W. (1995). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York: Guilford.

45.

Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256-1269.

46.

Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 103-125.

47.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.

48.

Veblen, T. (1899/1994). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Dover.

49.

Watson, D. C. (2015). Self-conscious emotions and materialism. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, doi: 0276236615587492.

50.

Wang, C., Cheng, Y., Chiou, W., & Kung, C. (2012). Shame for money: Shame enhances the incentive value of economic resources. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 77-85.

51.

Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1981). Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 89-114.

logo