바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The effect of odd price, hedonic goods, price consciousness, and purchase justification on purchase intention

Abstract

This study focused on product category, consumer’s inclination, and purchase situation where odd price works effectively. Experiment 1 selected product type, price type, and price consciousness as independent variables and purchase intention as a dependent variable. The result of this experiment showed that odd price is more effective when it is set on hedonic goods and the effect is much stronger to consumers who have high price consciousness. This is because the feeling of cheapness induced by odd price makes the purchase of hedonic goods justified and increases purchase intention. And consumers who have high price consciousness pay particular attention to low prices, so the effect of odd price stands out more when they purchase hedonic goods. Experiment 2 selected justification for hedonic goods purchase and price type as independent variables and purchase intention as a dependent variable. The result of this experiment showed that under purchase situation where consumers can't justify buying hedonic goods, odd price is more effective in increasing purchase intention. But when they can justify buying hedonic goods by any means, round price increases purchase intention highly.

keywords
odd price, round price, hedonic goods, price consciousness, purchase justification

Reference

1.

임병훈, 손영석 (2015). 9로 끝나는 가격정보에 대하여 소비자들의 가격컨스트락트와 종결욕구수준이 태도와 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 26(3), 177-196.

2.

Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2003). Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales : Evidence from field experiments. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1, 93-110.

3.

Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1990). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.

4.

Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Understanding and managing competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 225-241.

5.

Bizer, G. Y., & Schindler, R. M. (2005). Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price information processing. Psychology and Marketing, 22(10), 771-783.

6.

Bohm, G., & Pfister, H. (1996). Instrumental or emotional evaluations: What determines preferences? Acta Psychologica, 93(1), 135-148.

7.

Chang, H., & Chen, F. (2014). When is a 9-ending price perceived lower than a 0-ending price? The moderating role of price consciousness. International Journal of Business and Information, 9(1), 89-116.

8.

Choi, J., Lee, K., & Ji, Y. (2012). What type of framing message is more appropriate with nine-ending pricing? Marketing Letters, 23, 603 -614.

9.

Choi, J., Li, Y. J., Rangan, P., Chatterjee, P., & Singh, S. N. (2014). The odd-ending price justification effect: the influence of price- endings on hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42, 545-557.

10.

Choi, J., Singh, S., & Rangan, P. (2011). Odd- ending price: Justification for the hedonic purchase. Advances in Consumer Research, 39, 624-625.

11.

Chuang, S., Kung, C., Cheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2009). The effects of nine-ending prices and the need for cognition in price cognition. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 973-974.

12.

Coulter, K. S. (2001). Odd-ending price underestimation: An experimental examination of left-to-right processing effects. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(5), 276-292.

13.

Coupland, N. (2011). How frequent are numbers? Language & Communication, 31, 27-37.

14.

Crowley, A. E., & Spangenberg, E., & Hughes, K. R. (1992). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 239- 249.

15.

Dimofte, C. V., & Janiszewski, C. A. (2013). The illusion of lie effect: The suspicious fluency of round numbers. Advances in Consumer Research, 41, 729-730.

16.

Gabor, A., & Granger, C. W. J. (1964). Price sensitivity of the consumer. Journal of Advertising Research, 4, 40–44.

17.

Gauzente, C., & Roy, Y. (2012). Message content in keyword campaigns, click behavior, and price-consciousness: A study of millennial consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19, 78–87.

18.

Gedenk, K., & Sattler, H. (1999). The impact of price thresholds on profit contribution — Should retailers set 9-ending prices? Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 2-4.

19.

Hansen, H., & Hem, L. E. (2004). Brand extension evaluations: Effects of affective commitment, involvement, price consciousness and preference for bundling in the extension category. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 375-381.

20.

Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing. 46(3), 92-101.

21.

Jaber, M., Hubbard, N., & Wolverton, J. (2013). Are .99 price endings still an effective way to influence purchase intentions? Society for Marketing Advances Proceedings, 25, 283-284.

22.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.

23.

Kalyanam, K., & Shively, T. S. (1998). Estimating irregular pricing effects: A stochastic spline regression approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 16–29.

24.

Kardes, F. R., Posavac, S. S., & Cronley, M. L. (2004). Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 230–256.

25.

Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 155-170.

26.

Kleinsasser, S., & Wagner, U. (2011). Price endings and tourism consumers' price perceptions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 58-63.

27.

Kreul, L. M. (1982). Magic numbers: Psychological aspects of menu pricing. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 23(2), 70-75.

28.

Kukar-Kinney, M., Walters, R. G., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2007). Consumer responses to characteristics of price-matching guarantees: The moderating role of price consciousness. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 211-221.

29.

Lambert, Z. V. (1975). Perceived prices as related to odd and even price-endings. Journal of Retailing, 5(3), 13-22.

30.

Lascu, D. N. (1991). Consumer guilt: Examining the potential of a new marketing construct. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 290-295.

31.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Bloch, P. H., & Black, W. C. (1988). Correlates of price acceptability. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 243–252.

32.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netmeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234-245.

33.

Lynn, M., Flynn, S. M., & Helion, C. (2013). Do consumer prefer round prices? Evidence from pay-what-you-want decisions and self-pumped gasoline purchases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 36, 96-102.

34.

Manning, K. C., & Sprott, D. E. (2009). Price-endings, left-digit effect and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 328-335.

35.

Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451-466.

36.

Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2011). The influence of price discount versus bonus pack on the preference for virtue and vice foods. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 196–206.

37.

Monroe, K. B., & Petroshius, S. M. (1981). Buyers’perception of price: An update of the evidence. Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, 3, 43-55.

38.

Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.

39.

Okada, E. M., & Hoch, S. J. (2004). Spending time versus spending money. Joumal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 313-323.

40.

Park, C. W., & Mittal, B. (1985). A theory of involvement in consumer behavior: Problems and issues. Research in Consumer Behavior, 23, 201-232.

41.

Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1). 4-28.

42.

Quigley, C. J., & Notarantonio, E. M. (1992). An exploratory investigation of perceptions of odd and even pricing. Proceedings of the 1992 Academy of Marketing Science(AMS) Annual Conference, 306-309.

43.

Reber, R., Schwartz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382.

44.

Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532–547.

45.

Schindler, R. M. (2006). The 99 price ending as a signal of a low-price appeal. Journal of Retailing, 82(1), 71-77.

46.

Schindler, R. M., & Kibarian, T. (1993). Testing for perceptual underestimation of 9-ending prices. Advances in Customer Research, 20, 580 -585.

47.

Schindler, R. M., & Kibarian, T. (2001). Image communicated by the use of 99 endings in advertised prices. Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 95-100.

48.

Schindler, R. M., & Kibarian, T. M. (1996). Increased consumer sales response though use of 9odd-ending prices. Journal of Retailing, 72(2), 187-199.

49.

Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Customer Research, 24, 192–201.

50.

Schindler, R. M., & Warren, L. S. (1988). Effect of odd pricing on choice of items from a menu. Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 348-353.

51.

Shoham, A., & Brencic, M. M. (2004). Value, price Consciousness, and consumption frugality: An empirical study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 17(1), 55-69.

52.

Stiving, M. (2000). Price-endings when prices signal quality. Management Science, 46(12), 1617-1629.

53.

Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-446.

54.

Suri, R., Anderson, R. E., & Kotlov, V. (2004). The use of 9-ending prices: Contrasting the USA with Poland. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2), 56-72.

55.

Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.

56.

Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 54-64.

57.

Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. G. (2009). The ease-of-computation effect: The interplay of metacognitive experiences and naive theories in judgments of price differences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 81-91.

58.

Voss, K. E., Spangenherg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.

59.

Wadhwa, M., & Zhang, K. (2015). This number just feels right: The impact of roundedness of price numbers on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1172-1185.

60.

Weiss, R. E. (2009). Forex trading: The power of round numbers. http://ezinearticles.com/?Forex-Trading--The-Power-of-Round-Numbers&id=1851400

61.

Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.

62.

Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224-228.

63.

Zheng, Y., & Kivetz, R. (2009). The differential promotion effectiveness on hedonic versus utilitarian products. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 565-565.

logo