바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The effect of token promotional pricing on the intent to participate in the digital service promotion: Focusing on deal value

Abstract

This study noted why participation is low, even though digital services are free to experience. Experience promotion is consumed for a limited period of time, so people tend to be reluctant to participate if they are not aware of its value in detail, and in the case of digital services, it is difficult for consumers to immediately experience value. Therefore, it was expected that token price rather than free could increase participation in the promotion in the context of the need to be more specifically aware of its value by making cognitive assessments. Therefore, studies 1 and 2 showed that token price were more effective than free for digital services. Specifically, Study 1 revealed that the effect of the token price can’t be explained by the ease of assessment that the preceding study suggested, and Study 2 found that the recognition of value by activating the deal evaluation for digital services mediated token price effect. This study can present a practical marketing strategy of token price when it is necessary to induce consumer participation in the trial promotion used as a catalyst for regular subscriptions. In addition, the theoretical implications can also be found in that, unlike prior research, the way of increasing trial promotion participation have been identified in the psychological field.

keywords
Digital service, free trial, token price, deal value, deal evaluation

Reference

1.

이경민, 김대건, & 김재휘 (2019). 공짜보다 할인이 좋아!: 콘텐츠 구독에 대한 프로모션 유형이 참여 의도에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 307-307.

2.

이우빈, & 김재휘 (2019). 단일 대안 제시가 선택 연기에 미치는 효과: 예상되는 후회를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 20(3), 319-342.

3.

Cheng, H. K., & Liu, Y. (2012). Optimal software free trial strategy: The impact of network externalities and consumer uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 23(2), 488-504.

4.

Cronin Jr, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of retailing, 76(2), 193-218.

5.

Dai, H., Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2017). “Don’T Tell Me What to Do!” Shoppers Rely Less on Consumer Reviews For Experiential Than Material Purchases. ACR North American Advances.

6.

Diamond, W. D., & Campbell, L. (1989). The framing of sales promotions: effects on reference price change. ACR North American Advances.

7.

Dunegan, K. J. (1994). Feedback sign and mindful vs. mindless information processing. Advances in managerial cognition and organizational information processing, 5, 315-336.

8.

Gremler, D. D., & Brown, S. W. (1996). Service loyalty: its nature, importance, and implications. Advancing service quality: A global perspective, 5(1), 171-181.

9.

Guiltinan, J. P. (1989). A classification of switching costs with implications for relationship marketing. In AMA winter educators’ conference: Marketing theory and practice (pp. 216-20). Chicago: American Medical Association.

10.

Inman, J. J., Peter, A. C., & Raghubir, P. (1997). Framing the deal: The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 68-79.

11.

Klein, H. J. (1989). An integrated control theory model of work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 150-172.

12.

Kumar, A., & Gilovich, T. (2016). To do or to have, now or later? The preferred consumption profiles of material and experiential purchases. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 169-178.

13.

Kuvaas, B., & Selart, M. (2004). Effects of attribute framing on cognitive processing and evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 198-207.

14.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1990). Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition- transaction utility theory perspective. Journal of marketing, 54(3), 54-67.

15.

Mao, W. (2016). Sometimes “fee” is better than “free”: token promotional pricing and consumer reactions to price promotion offering product upgrades. Journal of Retailing, 92(2), 173-184.

16.

Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European review of social psychology, 1(1), 33-60.

17.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.

18.

Sawyer, A. G., & Dickson, P. R. (1984). Psychological perspectives on consumer response to sales promotion. Research on sales promotion: Collected papers, 2.

19.

Schmalensee, R. (1982). Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands. The American Economic Review, 72(3), 349-365.

20.

Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 4(3), 199-214.

logo