바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Understanding Consumer Intention to Share Native Advertising and Brand Information on Social Media: A Focus on Consumer Socialization

Abstract

The growing popularity and use of social networking sites (SNSs) have prompted a great deal of research on consumer acceptance of advertising as a crucial factor for advertisers and marketers seeking to deliver relevant advertising content to consumers with minimal disruption. Native advertising is a type of online advertising that is designed to integrate advertising content within the platform on which it appears. By surveying 399 Facebook users, this study examines antecedents of consumer intention to share native advertising and brand information on SNSs, based on the consumer socialization framework. Our findings reveal that positive brand-related peer communication, social media dependency, Facebook usage frequency, and attitude toward social media advertising in general are significant predictors of consumer’s intentions to share native advertising and recommend the brand on SNSs.

keywords
native advertising, consumer socialization, social networking sites, Facebook

Reference

1.

박신영, 김재휘, 김지호 (2012). SNS를 이용한 복합매체상황에서 노출순서에 따른 시너지 효과. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 13(2), 255-281.

2.

정의준, 이윤진, 유승호, 장예빛 (2013). 심리적 거리가 소비자의 온라인 구전 정보 수용에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 14(2), 365-383.

3.

최자영, 김용범 (2012). 소셜네트워크 (SNS)에서 제품 추천의 사회적 거리에 따른 설득력과 제품평가 분석. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 13(4), 513-539.

4.

Alcañiz, E. B.,Blas, S. S., & Torres, F. T. (2006). Dependency in consumer mediarelations: an application to the case of teleshopping. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 5(5),397-410

5.

Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of marketing, 69(3),19-34.

6.

Altimeter Group.(2013). Defining and mapping the native advertising landscape. A market definition report. San Mateo: CA.

7.

Bandura, A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

8.

Bauer, R. A., & Greyser, S. A. (1968). Advertising in America, the consumer view. Boston, MA: Harvard University.

9.

Becker-Olsen, K. L. (2003). And now, a word from our sponsor - a look at the effects of sponsored content and banner advertising. Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 17-32.

10.

Bellenger, D. N., & Moschis, G. P.(1982). A socialization model of retail patronage. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 373-378.

11.

Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 45(3), 180-191.

12.

Boerman, S. C., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Neijens, P. C. (2014). Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: A study on the effectiveness of European disclosure regulations. Psychology & Marketing, 31(3), 214-224.

13.

Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.

14.

Bush, A. J., Smith, R., & Martin, C. (1999). The influence of consumer socialization variables on attitude toward advertising: A comparison of African-Americans and Caucasians. Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 13-24.

15.

Cameron, G. T. (1994). Does publicity outperform advertising? An experimental test of the third-party endorsement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(3), 185-207.

16.

Campbell, C., & Marks, L. J. (2015). Good native advertising isn’t a secret. Business Horizons, 58(6), 599-606.

17.

Campbell, C., Cohen, J., & Ma, J. (2014). Advertisements just aren’t advertisements anymore: A new typology for evolving forms of online “advertising”. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(1), 7-10.

18.

Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354.

19.

Chu, S. C., & Sung, Y. (2015). Using a consumer socialization framework to understand electronic word-of-mouth(eWOM) group membership among brand followers on Twitter. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(4), 251-260.

20.

Chu, S. C., Windels, K., & Kamal, S. (2016). The influence of self-construal and materialism on social media intensity: A study of China and the United States. International Journal of Advertising, 35(3), 569-588.

21.

Churchill Jr, G. A., & Moschis, G. P. (1979). Television and interpersonal influences on adolescent consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(1), 23-35.

22.

Couldry, N., & Turow, J. (2014). Advertising, big data and the clearance of the public realm: marketers’ new approaches to the content subsidy. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1710-1726.

23.

de Gregorio, F., & Sung, Y.(2010). Understanding attitudes toward and behaviors in response to product placement. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 83-96.

24.

Dhar, V., & Chang, E. A. (2009). Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 300-307.

25.

East, R., Hammond, K., & Lomax, W.(2008). Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability. International Journal of research in Marketing, 25(3), 215-224.

26.

eMarketer. (2015). Social network adrevenues accelerate worldwide. eMarketer Inc., September 2015. http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R =1013015.

27.

Fu, J. R., Ju, P. H., & Hsu, C. W. (2015). Understanding why consumers engage in electronic word-of-mouth communication: Perspectives from theory of planned behavior and justice theory. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), 616-630.

28.

Gershoff, A. D., & Johar, G. V.(2006). Do you know me? Consumer calibration of friends’ knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 496-503

29.

Gould, S. J., Gupta, P. B., & Grabner-Kräuter, S. (2000). Product placements in movies: A cross-cultural analysis of Austrian, French and American consumers’ attitudes toward this emerging, international promotional medium. Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 41-58.

30.

Jackob, N. G. E. (2010). No alternatives? The relationship between perceived media dependency, use of alternative information sources, and general trust in mass media. International Journal of Communication, 4(May), 689-606.

31.

James, W. L., & Kover, A. J. (1992). Do overall attitudes toward advertising affect involvement with specific advertisements. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(5), 78-83.

32.

Jurvetson, S. (2000). What exactly is viral marketing. RedHerring, 78, 110-112.

33.

Kim, B. H., Pasadeos, Y., & Barban, A. (2001). On the deceptive effectiveness of labeled and unlabeled advertorialformats. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 265-281.

34.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.

35.

Köhler, C. F., Rohm, A. J., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2011). Return on interactivity: The impact of online agents on newcomer adjustment. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 93- 108.

36.

Kwon, E. S., Kim, E., Sung, Y., & Yoo, Y. C. (2014). Brand followers: Consumer motivation and attitude towards brand communications on Twitter. International Journal of Advertising, 33(4), 657-680.

37.

Laczniak, R. N., DeCarlo, T. E., & Ramaswami, S. N. (2001). Consumers’ responses to negative word‐of‐mouth communication: An attribution theory perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 57-73.

38.

Lazauskas, J. (2014). Study: Sponsored content has a trust problem. The Content Strategist, (July 9). Retrieved from http://contently.com/ strategist/2014/07/09/study-sponsored-content-has-a-trust-problem-2/.

39.

Lee, B., Salmon, C. T., & Paek, H. J. (2007). The effects of information sources on consumer reactions to direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising: A consumer socialization approach. Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 107-119.

40.

Lee, J., Kim, S., & Ham, C. D. (2016). A double-edged sword? Predicting consumers’ attitudes toward and sharing intention of native advertising on social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1425-1441.

41.

Lee, M., Rodgers, S., & Kim, M.(2009). Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude toward the brand and website. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 31(2), 1-11.

42.

Lueg, J. E., Ponder, N., Beatty, S. E., & Capella, M. L.(2006). Teenagers’ use of alternative shopping channels: A consumer socialization perspective. Journal of Retailing, 82(2), 137-153.

43.

Lueg, J. E., & Finney, R. Z. (2007). Interpersonal communication in the consumer socialization process: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 25-39.

44.

MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J.(1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65.

45.

McLeod, J. M., & O’Keefe, G. J. (1972). The Socialization Perspective and Communication Behavior. In G. Kline & P. J. Tichenor (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Mass Communication Research (121-168). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.

46.

Mehta, A. (2000). Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3), 67-72.

47.

Men, L. R., & Tsai, W. H. S. (2013). Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China. Public Relations Review, 39(1), 13-22.

48.

Moore, R. L., & Stephens, L. F. (1975). Some communication and demographic determinants of adolescent consumer learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(2), 80-92.

49.

Moschis, G. P. (1985). The role of family communication in consumer socialization of children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 898-913.

50.

Moschis, G. P., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1978). Consumer socialization: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(4), 599-609.

51.

Moschis, G. P., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). An analysis of the adolescent consumer. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 40-48.

52.

Moschis, G. P., & Moore, R. L. (1979). Decision making among the young: A socialization perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(2), 101-112.

53.

Moschis, G. P., Moore, R. L., & Smith, R. B. (1984). The impact of family communication on adolescent consumer socialization. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.) NA - Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 11, 314-319). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

54.

Muehling, D. D. (1987). An investigation of factors underlying attitude-toward-advertising- in-general. Journal of Advertising, 16(1), 32-40.

55.

Mukhopadhyay, A., & Yeung, C. W. (2010). Building character: Effects of lay theories of self-control on the selection of products for children. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 240-250.

56.

Muralidharan, S., & Men, L. R. (2015). How peer communication and engagement motivations influence social media shopping behavior: Evidence from China and the United States. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(10), 595-601.

57.

Pollay, R. W., & Mittal, B. (1993). Here’s the beef: Factors, determinants, and segments in consumer criticism of advertising. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 99-114.

58.

Ruiz-Mafe, C., Marti-Parreno, J., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2014). Key drivers of consumer loyalty to Facebook fanpages. Online Information Review, 13(3), 362-380.

59.

Shim, S. (1996). Adolescent consumer decision‐making styles: The consumer socialization perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 13(6), 547-569.

60.

Singh, N., Chao, M. C., & Kwon, I. W. G. (2006). A multivariate statistical approach to socialization and consumer activities of young adults: A cross-cultural study of ethnic groups in America. Marketing Management Journal, 16(2), 67-80.

61.

Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005). Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust, and choice in virtual markets. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 15-37.

62.

Sun, S., Rubin, A. M., & Haridakis, P. M. (2008). The role of motivation and media involvement in explaining internet dependency. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 408-431.

63.

Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131.

64.

Steffes, E. M., & Burgee, L. E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research, 19(1), 42-59.

65.

Sweetser, K. D., Ahn, S. J., Golan, G.J., & Hochman, A. (2016). Native advertising as a new public relations tactic. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(12), 1442-1457.

66.

Tan, S. J., & Chia, L. (2007). Are we measuring the same attitude? Understanding media effects on attitude towards advertising. Marketing Theory, 7(4), 353-377.

67.

Taylor, D. G., Lewin, J. E., & Strutton, D. (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks?: How gender and age shape receptivity. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 258-275.

68.

Tsang, A. S., & Prendergast, G. (2009). Is a “star” worth a thousand words?: The interplay between product-review texts and rating valences. European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12), 1269-1280.

69.

Tsai, W. H. S., & Men, L. R. (2013). Motivations and antecedents of consumer engagement with brand pages on social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 13(2), 76-87.

70.

Tutaj, K., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Effects of online advertising format and persuasion knowledge on audience reactions. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 5-18.

71.

van Reijmersdal, E., Neijens, P., & Smit, E. (2005). Readers’ reactions to mixtures of advertising and editorial content in magazines. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 27(2), 39-53.

72.

Vega, T. (2013). Ad-sponsor ededitorial content draws regulator’s notice. New York Times, October 23, retrieved from http://www.nytimes. com/2013/10/24/business/media/ad-sponsored-editorial-content-draws-regulators notice.html.

73.

Wang, X., Yu, C., & Wei, Y. (2012). Social media peer communication and impacts on purchase intentions: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 198-208.

74.

Wangenheim, F. V., & Bayón, T. (2004). The effect of word of mouth on services switching: Measurement and moderating variables. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10), 1173-1185.

75.

Ward, S. (1974). Consumer socialization. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 1-14.

76.

Ward, S. (1978). Contributions of socialization theory to consumer behavior research. American Behavioral Scientist, 21(4), 501-514.

77.

Ward, S., Wackman, D. B., & Wartella, E. (1977). How children learn to buy: The development of consumer information-processing skills. Oxford, England: Sage Publications, Inc.

78.

Wojdynski, B. W., & Evans, N. J.(2016). Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 157-168.

79.

Wolin, L. D., Korgaonkar, P., & Lund, D. (2002). Beliefs, attitudes and behaviour towards Web advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 21(1), 87-113.

80.

Yeh, Y. H., & Choi, S. M. (2011). MINI-lovers, maxi-mouths: An investigation of antecedents to eWOM intention among brand community members. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(3), 145-162.

81.

Zhang, K. Z., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers’ online shopping decision. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 89-98.

logo