- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Analysis and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in seafood from oil contaminated bay
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2010, v.23 no.2, pp.187-195
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2010.23.2.187
&
(2010). Analysis and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in seafood from oil contaminated bay. Analytical Science and Technology, 23(2), 187-195, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2010.23.2.187
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
To assess health risk for the intake among residents after the Hebei Spirit oil spill, 16 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in seafood samples from oil contaminated bay were determined by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MSD) and samples were personally collected and purchased by residents. Samples were hydrolyzed with KOH and extracted with methylene chloride. The extracted solution were cleaned up using silica/florisil column and 16 PAHs were eluted by methylene chloride : n-hexane (1:9)mixture and determined by GC-MSD in Selected Ion Monitoring (SIM) mode. The mean recoveries for 16PAHs ranged from 79% to 85%. The 16 PAHs levels in 126 samples ranged from 0.17 to 6.04 μg/kg and the TEQBaP (Toxic EQuivalents) levels in 126 samples were calculated using benzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factor for individual 16 PAHs and ranged from 0 to 0.91 μgTEQ/kg. The average Benzo(a)pyrene dietary exposure of residents was 5.5×10−8 mg/kg bw/day and the average PAHs chronic dietary exposure was 1.3×10−5mg TEQ/kg bw/day. The margin of exposure (MOE) and the excess cancer risk and were 1.8×106 and 9.8×10−8,respectively. Therefore, the assessment result was considered as low concern for health risk.
- keywords
- PAHs, oil spill, seafood, <TEX>$TEQ_{BaP}$</TEX>, MOE
Reference
1
1. 국토해양부, 해양오염영향조사 및 생태계 복원연구, 2008.
2
2. M. Bolger, S. H. Henry and C. D. Carrington, American Fisheries Society Symposium, 18, 837-843(1996).
3
3. H. H. Yang and C. M. Chen, Chemosphere, 56, 879- 887(2004).
4
4. R. Dabestani and I. N. Ivanov, Photochemical. Photobiology., 41, 10-17(1999).
5
5. C. Liu, Z. Niu, D. V. Niekerk, J. Xue and L. Zheng, Re. Environ Contam Toxicol, 192, 1-28(2008).
6
6. WHO, ‘Air Quality Guidelines’, 2nd Ed., Chap 5.9, 1- 24, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000.
7
7. O. Pelkonene and D. W. Nebert, Pharmacol Rev., 43, 189-222(1982).
8
8. Y. C. M. Staal, M. H. M. van Herwijnen, D. S. Pushparajah, M. Umachandran, C. Ioannides, F. J. Schooten and J. H. M. van Delft, Mutagenesis, 22(1), 55-62(2007).
9
9. IARC, Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 92, 2006.
10
10. 허수정, 우건조, 최동미, 분석과학, 20(2), 170-175(2007).
11
11. J. S. Douglass and D. R. Tennant, ‘Food Chemical Risk Analysis’, Chapman & Hall, 1997.
12
12. T. Petry, P. Schmid and C. Schlatter, Chemosphere, 32, 639-648(1996).
13
13. 이효민, 윤은경, 박경아, 김윤희, 정소영, 권기성, 김명철, 송인상, 이철호, 양지선, 양기화, J. Fd Hyg. Safety, 19(1), 1-8(2004).
14
14. Bolger, M. and C. Carrington, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 195-204(1999).
15
15. 산업복지부 기술표준원, 제 5차 한국인 인체치수조사 사업 보고서, 2004.
16
16. 심재영, 황진희, 염태경, 오우용, 성수경, 장동덕, 이효민, 식품의약품안전청연구보고서, 11, 873-889(2007).
17
17. Technical Report Series (TRS) 930-JECFA 64/61, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, 2005.
18
18. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Provisional guidance for quantitative risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. EPA/600/R-93/089. Cincinnati: Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 20, 1993.
19
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Intergrated Risk Information System (IRIS), CASRN 50- 32-8, 2001.
20
20. 허수정, 박성국, 진선희, 최동미, 분석과학, 22(1), 109- 117(2009).
21
21. Susan Luscutoff, California Department of Health Services, 18 December. 5 pp. 1997.
22
22. Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry : Health Consultation. M/V Kuroshima Oil Spill, Alaska. 1999.
Other articles from this issue
- Single crystal growth of ZnWO4 by the Czochralski method and characterization
- Comparison of TVOCs emission characterization of paint and putty according to the amendment of test specimen preparation method
- Simultaneous analysis of β-lactam antibiotics in surface water
- Analytical method of New POPs in environmental samples
- Evaluation of TVOC regulation level of sealant products in accordance with simultaneous revision of testing method and regulation value in the law of indoor air quality management
- Characteristics of tamiflu occurrence in surface water using LC/MS/MS
- Determination of bromate in bottled mineral water in Korea
- Tritium concentration in rain with seasonal variation
- A glucose biosensor based on deposition of glucose oxidase onto Au nanoparticles poly(maleic anhydride)-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotube electrode
- Study on the immobilization of plant glutathione S-transferase for development of herbicide detection kit
- Determination of ibuprofen and its metabolites in human urine by GC-MS
- Analysis and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in seafood from oil contaminated bay
- Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in processed foods
- A study on the measurement of hangul signature by SHWI
- A study on surface modification of Ag powder for developing latent fingerprints
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.