바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

How the High-Stakes and College Entrance Exam Affects Students’ Perception: Implication on Management Policy in Higher Education

East Asian Journal of Business Economics / East Asian Journal of Business Economics, (E)2288-2766
2022, v.10 no.1, pp.83-97
https://doi.org/10.20498/eajbe.2022.10.1.83
Nguyen Van BAO (KDI School of Public Policy and Management)
Yoon C. Cho

Abstract

Purpose – Vietnam’s education system has undergone numerous changes. One of the significant reforms is the college admissions process which all high school seniors are obliged to go through the High School Graduation Examination (HSGE). Despite its significance, there is lack of research to examine the effects of high-stakes and nationally standardized exams on students’ learning experiences. By applying the concept of washback, the purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive qualitative analysis of students’ perceptions and learning experiences when preparing for and taking the HSGE. Research design, data, and methodology – 20 high school seniors were participated in this study. This study utilized a stratified sampling methods and randomly selected participants. Result – This study revealed that the washback effect of the HSGE strongly existed in students’ learning experiences. This study also found that there is a negative washback effect of the HSGE on students’ learning, particularly for those living in rural areas although Vietnamese schools and communities shared unequal educational and socioeconomic resources. Conclusion – The results of this study would be useful for policymakers to provide better assessment system to enhance students’ ability and reduce exam pressure. This study also makes suggestions in regard to bringing more formative types of assessment into the high-stakes and nationally standardized exam.

keywords
Higher Education, College Entrance Exam, Students’ Perception and Learning, Management Policy

Reference

1.

Alderson, J. C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13(3), 280- 297.

2.

Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.

3.

Allen, D. (2016). Japanese cram schools and entrance exam washback. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 54-67.

4.

Andrews, S., Fullilove, J., & Wong, Y. (2002). Targeting washback: A case study. System, 30(2), 207-223.

5.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

6.

Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279.

7.

Bailey, K. (1999). Washback in language testing. TOEFL Monograph Series. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

8.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

9.

Carini, R., Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (2000). Do teacher unions hinder educational performance?: Lessons learned from state SAT and ACT scores. Harvard Educational Review, 70(4), 437-467.

10.

Cheng, L. E., Watanabe, Y. E., & Curtis, A. E. (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

11.

Choi, S. H. J., & Nieminen, T. A. (2013). Factors influencing the higher education of international students from Confucian East Asia. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 161-173.

12.

Dao, M. T. N., & Thorpe, A. (2015). What factors influence Vietnamese students’ choice of university? International Journal of Educational Management, 29, 666-681.

13.

Green, A. (2007). Washback to learning outcomes: A comparative study of IELTS preparation and university pre‐sessional language courses. Assessment in Education, 14(1), 75-97.

14.

Gosa, C. M. C. (2004). Investigating washback: A case study using student diaries. (Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.422527.

15.

Fuhrman, S. H. (1993). Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

16.

Hughes, A. (1993). Washback and TOEFL 2000. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Reading, England, UK.

17.

Kellaghan, T., & Greaney, V. (2019). Public examinations examined. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1-331.

18.

Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: backwash from classroom to child. Language testing in Asia, 1(3), 1-10

19.

Maltese, A. V., Tai, R. H., & Fan, X. (2012). When is homework worth the time? Evaluating the association between homework and achievement in high school science and math. The High School Journal, 96(1), 52-72.

20.

McCabe, D. (2005). Cheating: Why students do It and how we can help them stop. American Educator, 25(4), 38-43.

21.

Minh, T. (2019). Involvers of exam cheating scandal in two Vietnam provinces punished. Ha Noi Times, 12(April), Hanoi, Vietnam. Retrieved from: http://hanoitimes.vn/involvers-of-exam-cheating-scandal-in-two-vietnam-provincespunished- 1188.html

22.

Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam (2014). Analysis of the national high school graduation examination in 2014. Vietnam. Retrieved from https://xahoi.com.vn/thi-tot-nghiepthpt-2014-bo-gddt-chinh-thuc-cong-bo-ty-le-do-totnghiep- 173278.html

23.

Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam. (2018). No place for cheating in education. Retrieved from https://vietnamnews.vn/opinion/519075/no-place-for-cheating-in-education.html.

24.

Muthanna, A., & Sang, G. (2015). Undergraduate Chinese students’ perspectives on Gaokao examination: Strengths, weaknesses, and implications. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 5(2), 3-12.

25.

Nga, M. (2019). Stressed out Vietnamese falling mentally ill in the millions. VN Express International News, 7 April, Hanoi, Vietnam. Retrieved from https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/stressed-out-vietnamese-falling-mentally-ill-in-the-millions- 3904714.html.

26.

Nguyen, C. (2020). Nationally standardized policy and locally interpreted implementation: How Vietnamese school leaders enact education reform. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(1), 1-30.

27.

Pham, H. (2015). Overhaul of university entrance exam is put to the test. University World News, 12 June, Vietnam. Retrieved from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20150612134930920.

28.

Pham, L. H., & Fry, G. (2004). Universities in Vietnam: Legacies, challenges and prospects. Asian Universities: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Challenges, 6(3), 191-230.

29.

Rigol, G. W. (2003). Admissions decision-making models: How US institutions of higher education select undergraduate students. NY: The College Board.

30.

Rosinger, K. O., Ford, K. S., & Choi, J. (2020). The role of selective college admissions criteria in interrupting or reproducing racial and economic inequities. The Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 1-26.

31.

Tran, A. T. M. (2014). Vietnam: Can one national exam test all? October, World Bank Blogs, Washington, D.C.

32.

Virkiru, L. I. (2011). From assessment to learning: The teaching of English beyond examinations. Educational Forum, 75(1), 129–142.

33.

Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroombased research. Language Testing, 13(3), 318-333.

34.

Xiao, Y., Sharpling, G., & Liu, H. (2011). Washback of national matriculation English test on students’ learning in the Chinese secondary school context. Asian EFL Journal, 13(3), 103-129.

35.

Zhu, R. (2014). A comparative study of the college entrance examinations (CEEs): SAT and ACT in the United States and Gaokao in the People’s Republic of China. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Akron). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_etd/send_file/send?accession=akron1418220493&disposition=inline

East Asian Journal of Business Economics