바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Difference in the information considered in a political choice situation between Korean elderly and college students

Abstract

According to socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen, 1995), older people focus more on emotional information than on factual information because emotionally meaningful goals become more important than the knowledge-related goals as the perceived remaining time to live diminishes with age. This study was performed to test whether the types (emotional vs. factual) of information one considered in a political choice-making situation differed according to age. After reading the candidate's speech, each elderly adult and college student was asked whether s/he was going to choose the candidate and to justify her/his decision. The rate of factual decisions (decisions based on factual information) was higher in both male and female college students and in elderly men, and the rate of emotional decisions was higher in elderly women. When a word-recognition test was administered after 20 minutes, college students showed better recognition of factual words than emotional words regardless of the type of information they considered in decision-making. In contrast, the elderly adults showed better recognition of words consistent with the type of information they considered in decision-making. The present results partially support socioemotional selectivity theory.

keywords
Submission Date
2015-04-15
Revised Date
2015-06-02
Accepted Date
2015-06-09

Reference

1.

고선규, 강효신, 이태호 (2009). 정서 얼굴에대한 노인의 선택적 주의 과정 특성. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28(1), 81-96.

2.

곽삼근, 조혜선, 윤혜경 (2005). 생애주기별 성역할 발달 및 갈등. 한국여성학, 21(2), 147-179.

3.

박재간, 이인수 (2001). 우리나라 노인의 정치참여의 과제-사회활동에 관한 국내외 고찰과 미래를 위한 제안. 한국사회복지학회학술대회 자료집, 173-197.

4.

백지은 (2008). 한국노인의 전통적 가치관에따른 성공적 노화 인식 차이. 한국노년학, 28(2), 227-249.

5.

백혜정 (2004). 우리나라 성인들의 실생활 갈등상황 해결에서의 도덕지향에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 12(2), 123-140

6.

안정신, 정영숙, 정여진, 서수균 (2011). 성공적노화 연구의 비판적 고찰. 한국심리학회지:발달, 24(3), 35-54.

7.

유 경, 민경환 (2005). 연령 증가에 따른 정서복잡성의 변화가 장노년기 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향. 한국노년학, 25(4), 189-203.

8.

이신숙 (1997). 노인의 성역할 태도와 부부적응에 관한 연구. 한국노년학, 17(2), 70-85.

9.

이우경, 방희정 (2008). 성인기 여성의 스트레스, 마음챙김, 자기-자애(慈愛), 심리적 안녕감 및 심리 증상 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 21(4), 127-146.

10.

최희철, 정민선, 장지영, 김지현 (2011). 남성성역할 갈등과 우울의 관계에 대한 기본욕구 충족의 매개효과 검증: 남자 고등학생을 대상으로. 상담학연구, 12(2), 559-576.

11.

Ågren, M. (1998). Life at 85 and 92: A qualitative longitudinal study of how the oldest old experience and adjust to the increasing uncertainty of existence. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47(2), 105-117.

12.

Carstensen, L. L. (1993). Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 40. 209-254.

13.

Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 151-156.

14.

Carstensen, L. L., & Turk-Charles, S. (1994). The salience of emotion across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 9(2), 259-264.

15.

Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T.(2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103-123.

16.

Denburg, N. L., Buchanan, T. W., Tranel, D., &Adolphs, R. (2003). Evidence for preserved emotional memory in normal older persons. Emotion, 3(3), 239-253.

17.

Drolet, A., Williams, P., & Lau-Gesk, L. (2007). Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products. Marketing Letters, 18(4), 211-221.

18.

Fung, H. H., & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Sending memorable messages to the old: age differences in preferences and memory for advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 163-178.

19.

Geary, D. C., Frensch, P. A., & Wiley, J. G.(1993). Simple and complex mental subtraction: Strategy choice and speed-ofprocessing differences in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 242-256.

20.

Gould, O. N., & Dixon, R. A. (1993). How we spent our vacation: Collaborative storytelling by young and old adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(1), 10-17.

21.

Hess, T. M., Beale, K. S., & Miles, A. (2010). The impact of experienced emotion on evaluative judgments: The effects of age and emotion regulation style. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(6), 648-672.

22.

Hess, T. M., Leclerc, C. M., Swaim, E., &Weatherbee, S. R. (2009). Aging and everyday judgments: the impact of motivational and processing resource factors. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 735-740.

23.

Löckenhoff, C. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2004). Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: The increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1395-1424.

24.

Löckenhoff, C. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2008). Decision strategies in health care choices for self and others: Older but not younger adults make adjustments for the age of the decision target. The Journals of Gerontology Series B:Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(2), 106-109.

25.

May, C. P., Rahhal, T., Berry, E. M., & Leighton,E. A. (2005). Aging, source memory, and emotion. Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 571-578.

26.

Mikels, J. A., Löckenhoff, C. E., Maglio, S. J., Carstensen, L. L., Goldstein, M. K., &Garber, A. (2010). Following your heart or your head: focusing on emotions versus information differentially influences the decisions of younger and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(1), 87-95.

27.

Mikels, J. A., Maglio, S. J., Reed, A. E., &Kaplowitz, L. J. (2011). Should I go with my gut? Investigating the benefits of emotionfocused decision making. Emotion , 11(4), 743-753.

28.

Reed, A. E., Mikels, J. A., & Simon, K. I. (2008). Older adults prefer less choice than young adults. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 671-675.

29.

Yoon, C., Cole, C. A., & Lee, M. P. (2009). Consumer decision making and aging: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(1), 2-16.

logo