바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Re-examination of the Role of Executive Function in Sentence Processing Development: Inhibition versus Cognitive Flexibility

Abstract

Cognitive control hypothesis proposed that 4-5-year-old children’s immature inhibitory control leads children to commit unique interpretation errors in processing a temporary ambiguous sentence. However recent findings showed a tendency of association between cognitive flexibility and children’s sentence processing ability rather than inhibitory control. The present study examined which component of executive function between inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility, directly relates to 4-5-year-old children’s sentence processing ability. Using flanker task, children’s cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control were measured. A sentence act-out task was also administered to measure children’s sentence processing abilities. The results showed that cognitive flexibility indexed by sequential congruency effect significantly and uniquely contributed to children’s sentence interpretation errors, after controlling age, working memory, and abilities processing unambiguous sentences. By contrast, inhibitory control was not related to sentence processing. These results demonstrate that cognitive flexibility plays a more crucial role than inhibition in the development of child sentence processing ability, suggesting further that active goal/cue monitoring may be an important aspect of sentence processing abilities.

keywords
Submission Date
2016-07-15
Revised Date
2016-08-21
Accepted Date
2016-08-30

Reference

1.

박현진, 김초복, 박영신 (2015). 갈등적응효과로 살펴본 인지적 통제의 연령차. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28(3), 171-187.

2.

손현주, 최영은 (2011). 학령전기 아동의 문장처리 능력과 실행 기능의 관련성 연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 24(3), 87-104.

3.

주나래, 최영은, 조증열 (2015). 초기 한글 읽기 발달에서 실행 기능의 역할: 억제 능력 및 인지적 유연성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28(2), 125-146.

4.

최영은 (2009). 문장 의미 처리에서 학령전기아동의 운율 정보 이용. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 14, 442-455.

5.

최영은 (2011). 문장처리 발달 양상의 보편성검토. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 23(1), 91-122.

6.

Ambrosi, S., Lemaire, P., & Blaye, A. (2016). Do Young Children Modulate Their Cognitive Control?. Experimental psychology, 63(2), 117-126.

7.

Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current biology, 20(4), R136-R140.

8.

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation, 8, 47-89.

9.

Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R. A., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., ..., & Shah, C. (2000). Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional ‘set’: evidence from fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(1), 1-9.

10.

Barker, J. E., & Munakatka, Y. (2015). Time isn’t the essence: Activating goals rather than delays improves inhibitory control in children. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1898-1908.

11.

Bialystok, E. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 117-121.

12.

Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Blaye, A., & Poulin- Dubois, D. (2010). Word mapping and executive functioning in young monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(4), 485-508.

13.

Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647-663.

14.

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological review, 108(3), 624.

15.

Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76-106). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

16.

Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child development, 72(4), 1032-1053.

17.

Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., & Munakata, Y. (2009). Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Acad-emy of Sciences, USA, 106(14), 5529-5533.

18.

Chevalier, N., Chatham, C. H., & Munakata, Y. (2014). The practice of going helps children to stop: The importance of context monitoring in inhibitory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 959-965.

19.

Choi, Y., & Trueswell, J. C. (2010). Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 41-61.

20.

de Abreu, P. M. E., Cruz-Santos, A., Tourinho, C. J., Martin, R., &Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingualism enriches the poor enhanced cognitive control in low-income minority children. Psychological science, 23(11), 1364-1371.

21.

Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. Penguin.

22.

Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool Program Improves Cognitive Control. Science, 318(5855), 1387-1388.

23.

Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964.

24.

Eakin, L., Minde, K., Hechtman, L., Ochs, E., Krane, E., Bouffard, R., Greenfield, B., & Looper, K. (2004). The marital and family functioning of adults with ADHD and their spouses. Journal of Attention Disorders, 8(1), 1-10.

25.

Egner, T. (2007). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 12(10), 374-380.

26.

Egner, T., Ely, S., & Grinband, J. (2010). Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Frontiers in psychology, 1, 154.

27.

Fernald, A., Swingley, D., & Pinto, J. P. (2001). When half a word is enough: Infants can recognize spoken words using partial phonetic information. Child development, 72(4), 1003-1015.

28.

Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). The structure of oral language and reading and their relation to comprehension in Kindergarten through Grade 2. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 655-681.

29.

Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480.

30.

Grundy, J. G., & Bialystok, E. (2015). It’s not that simple: Sequential congruency effects reveal a bilingual disengagement advantage. In Poster presented at the Workshop on Bilingualism and Executive Function: An Interdisciplinary Approach, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY.

31.

Hala, S., McKay, L., Brown, A. M. B., & San Huan, V. (2016). Source monitoring and executive function in 2.5- to 3-year-olds. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1-17.

32.

Hsu, N., & Novick, J. M. (2016). Dynamic engagement of cognitive control modulates recovery from misinterpretation during realtime language processing. Psychological Science, 27(4), 572-582.

33.

Hughes, C. (1998). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 233-253.

34.

January, D., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Co-localization of Stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca's area:Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(12), 2434-2444.

35.

Larson, M. J., Clawson, A., Clayson, P. E., & South, M. (2012). Cognitive control and conflict adaptation similarities in children and adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37(4), 343-357.

36.

Mazuka, R., Jincho, N., & Oishi, H. (2009). Development of executive control and language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 59-89.

37.

Milham, M. P., Banich, M. T., Webb, A., Barad, V., Cohen, N. J., Wszalek, T., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Cognitive Brain Research, 12(3), 467-473.

38.

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis.Cognitive psychology, 41(1), 49-100.

39.

Munakata, Y., Snyder, H. R., & Chatham, C. H. (2012). Developing Cognitive Control: Three Key Transitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2) 71-77.

40.

Novick, J. M., Kan, I. P., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). A case for conflict across multiple domains: memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(6), 527-567.

41.

Novick, J. M., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2008). Putting lexical constraints in context into the visual-world paradigm. Cognition, 107(3), 850-903.

42.

Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson- Schill, S. L. (2005). Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263-281.

43.

Oishi, H., Jincho, N., & Mazuka, R. (2010). Sentence processing under the control of executive control?: Contribution of inhibition function to garden-path recovery, Paper presented at CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY, U.S.A, March 2010.

44.

Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C. (2014). No fear of commitment:Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development, 10(3), 206-233.

45.

Prince, M., Patel, V., Saxena, S., Maj, M., Maselko, J., Phillips, M. R., & Rahman, A. (2007). No health without mental health. The Lancet, 370(9590), 859-877.

46.

Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42(8), 1029-1040.

47.

Trueswell, J. C., Papafragou, A., & Choi, Y. (2011). Referential and syntactic processes:what develops?. The Processing and Acquisition of Reference, 65-108.

48.

Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89-134.

49.

Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2011). The development of future-oriented control: An electrophysiological investigation. NeuroImage, 56(3), 1648-1654.

50.

Weighall, A. R. (2008). The kindergarten path effect revisited: Children’s use of context in processing structural ambiguities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99(2), 75-95.

51.

Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 40(5), 2022-2037.

52.

Woodard, K., Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2016). Taking your own path: Individual differences in executive function and language processing skills in child learners. Journal of experimental child psychology, 141, 187-209.

53.

Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. (2009). Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence. Neuroimage, 48(1), 280-290.

logo