바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The development of children's abilities to flexibly use mutual exclusivity in word learning

Abstract

Young children readily exploit the mutual exclusivity assumption that each object has one category label, when inferring the referent of a novel word. However, one should suspend this assumption when interpreting a word from a foreign language, which does not share the same knowledge of words with one’s native language. The present study investigated 2- to 3-year-olds’ ability to suspend the mutual exclusivity assumption toward a foreign word. In the native language test trials, a Korean-speaking experimenter presented the children with one familiar object and one novel object, and asked the child to pick a referent of a novel Korean word, “muppi”. In the foreign language trials, on the other hand, a Spanish-speaking experimenter presented the child with one familiar and one novel object, and asked the child to pick a referent of a novel Spanish word, “Pefo”. In the native language test trials, children chose the novel object more often than predicted by chance and there was no significant age difference. In the foreign language test trials, 2-year-olds again selected the novel object more often than predicted by chance, whereas 3-year-olds’ performance was not significantly different from chance. These results suggest that the ability to suspend mutual exclusivity in interpreting a foreign word develops between 2 and 3 years of age.

keywords
Submission Date
2017-01-15
Revised Date
2017-02-20
Accepted Date
2017-02-24

Reference

1.

이윤미, 송현주 (2016). 조기 외국어 노출이 영아기 언어의 관습성 이해 발달에 미치는영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 29(3), 215-229.

2.

이현아, 김은영, 송현주 (2016). 단일 언어 사용 2-3세 아동의 외국어 단어에 대한 이해. 아동학회지, 37(4), 159-168.

3.

Au, T. K., & Glusman, M. (1990). The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: To honor or not to honor? Child Development, 61(5), 1474-1490.

4.

Byers-Heinlein, K., Chen, K. H., & Xu, F. (2014). Surmounting the Tower of Babel: Monolingual and bilingual 2-year-olds’ understanding of the nature of foreign language words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 87-100.

5.

Carlson, S. M., & Wang, T. S. (2007). Inhibitory control and emotion regulation in preschool children. Cognitive Development, 22, 489-510.

6.

Fan, S. P., Liberman, Z., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D. (2015). The exposure advantage: Early exposure to a multilingual environment promotes effective communication. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1090-1097.

7.

Halberda, J. (2003). The development of a word-learning strategy. Cognition, 87, B23-B34.

8.

Haryu, E. (1998). Effects of knowledge about cross-language equivalents on children’s use of mutual exclusivity in interpreting novel labels. Japanese Psychological Research, 40(2), 82-1.

9.

Henderson, A. M. E., & Scott, J. C. (2015). Shec alled that thing a mido, but should you call it a mido too? Linguistic experience influences infants' expectations of conventionality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 332.

10.

Howard, L. H., Carrazza, C., & Woodward, A. L. (2014). Neighborhood linguistic diversity predicts infants’ social learning. Cognition, 133(2), 474-479.

11.

Markman, E. M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14, 57-77.

12.

Markman, E. M., Wasow, J. L., & Hansen, M. B. (2003). Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners. Cognitive Psychology, 47(3), 241-275.

13.

Mather, E., & Plunkett, K. (2010). Novel labels support 10-month-olds’ attention to novel objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 232-242.

14.

Merriman, W. E., & Bowman, L. L. (1989). The mutual exclusivity bias in children’'s word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 54(3-4), 1-129.

logo