바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Dimensions of learning amotivation in middle school: Effects of parental attitudes, teachers’ attitudes and previous academic achievement, mediated by perceived competence and autonomy

Abstract

This study aimed to predict students’ learning amotivation with the following predictors: parental attitudes, teachers’ attitudes, and previous academic achievement. Learning amotivation had four dimensions: task characteristics, lack of task value, absence of belief in personal abilities, and absence of belief in personal effort. The data analysis incorporated the students’ perceived competence and perceived autonomy as mediating variables. To ascertain the associations within and between the variables, path analysis was applied to questionnaire data on 331 middle school students. The results found complex interrelationships: Previous academic achievement, perceived competence, and parental neglect predicted absence of belief in personal abilities; teachers’ attitudes, parental neglect, and perceived competence predicted lack of task value. Teachers’ attitudes, parental over-control, and perceived competence significantly influenced task characteristics. Previous academic achievement, parental neglect, perceived competence, perceived autonomy, and teachers’ attitudes predicted absence of belief in personal effort. Perceived competence and perceived autonomy differently mediated the effects of parental neglect and previous academic achievement on learning amotivation depending on its dimensions. In sum, the results confirmed that learning amotivation is a multidimensional construct.

keywords
Submission Date
2018-07-04
Revised Date
2018-08-16
Accepted Date
2018-08-28

Reference

1.

강상진, 김아영, 박광배, 반재천, 이규민 (2006). 중학생용 적성검사 개발 보고서. 한국중앙고용정보원 자료.

2.

김덕진, 양명한 (2009). 체육교사의 교수행동이 고등학생들의 내재적 동기와 수업태도에 미치는 영향. 체육과학연구, 15, 15-29.

3.

김성수, 윤미선 (2012). 자기결정성이론의 연구동향 및 학업성취와의 관계에 대한 메타분석. 교육학연구, 50(4), 77-106.

4.

김아영 (2008). 한국 청소년의 학업동기 발달. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 111-134.

5.

김아영 (2010). 학업동기: 이론, 연구와 적용. 서울: 학지사.

6.

김아영, 신영희 (2005). 중학교 영재학생과 일반학생의 학업적 자기조절 동기유형과 실패내성 및 자아존중감 간의 관계. 교육과학연구, 35(3), 65-79.

7.

김혜온, 유계환 (2017). 초․중․고 학생들이 지각한 부모의 비지지적 양육태도와 자녀의 유능감, 자율성이 학습무동기에 미치는 영향: 학교급간 및 성별 차이 분석을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 30(3), 45-65.

8.

김혜온, 정정숙 (2014). 중․고등학교 가출청소년의 가정복귀요인: 개인, 가정, 학교요인의 분석. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 27(3), 21-41.

9.

문은식, 배정희 (2010) 학습사 및 사회적, 동기적 변인과 학습된 무기력의 관계: 남고생과 여고생의 비교. 교육심리연구, 24(1), 183-205.

10.

봉미미, 김혜연, 신지연, 이수현, 이화숙 (2008). 한국 청소년의 학습동기에 영향을 미치는사회문화적 요인 탐색. 한국심리학회지:사회문제, 14(1), 319-348.

11.

서지혜, 이종숙 (2014). 아동이 지각한 모의 양육태도와 자기결정성 학습동기의 관계:학업적 실패내성의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 11(2), 429-454.

12.

손원숙, 배주현(2014). 여고생이 지각한 어머니와 교사의 자율성지지와 학업성취도 간의관계. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 19(3), 253-272.

13.

심우엽 (2001). 연령에 따른 학습동기의 변화. 초등교육연구, 14(3). 19-44.

14.

유계환 (2017). 부모의 비지지적 양육태도와 자녀의 자율성이 학습무동기에 미치는 영향. 목포대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

15.

이명희, 김아영(2008). 자기결정성이론에 근거한 한국형 기본 심리 욕구 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(4), 157-174.

16.

이은주 (2015). 무동기의 발달양상에 따른 잠재계층 분류 및 영향요인 검증. 교육학연구, 53(1), 111-135.

17.

이정옥, 최해연 (2016). 모의 통제양식과 모의적응 및 자녀의 적응. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 29(2), 1-19.

18.

이창현, 이은주 (2016). 무동기 학생들은 모두같은가? 기대-가치에 따른 무동기 잠재집단 분류 및 예측요인 검증. 교육학연구, 54(1), 53-76.

19.

조은문, 이종연 (2012). 학습무동기 신념이 높은 중학생을 위한 동기조절 프로그램 개발과 효과. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 9(1), 85-110.

20.

최효식(2012). 학업성취 수준에 따른 시험 효과연구. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

21.

허묘연 (1999). 청소년이 지각한 부모양육행동척도 개발 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원박사학위논문.

22.

Amado, D., Sanchez-Oliva, D., GonzalezPonce, I., Pulido-Gonzalez, J.J., & Sanchez-Miguel, P.A. (2015). Incidence of Parental support and pressure on their children’s motivational processes towards support practice regarding gender. PLOS ONE, Doi: 10.1371/ journal. pone.0128015.

23.

Anderman. E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287-309.

24.

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., &Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413.

25.

Baker, S.R. (2004). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Current Psychology, 23(3), 189-202.

26.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

27.

Chen, F. M., & Luster, T. (2002). Factors related to parenting practices in Taiwan. Early Child Development and Care, 172(5), 413-430.

28.

Cheung, C. & McBride-Chang, C. (2008). Relations of perceived maternal parenting style, practices, and learning motivation to academic competence in Chinese children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(1), 1-22.

29.

Chouinard, R. (2001). Annual changes in motivation for mathematics in high school according to age and gender. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 25-37.

30.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

31.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

32.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what”and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

33.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

34.

Hamm, D. (2002). Teachers as resources and obstacles to students’ intrinsic motivation. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.

35.

Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-179.

36.

Hofer, M., Fries, S., Helmke, A., Kilian, B., Kuhnle, C., Zivkovic, I., Goellner, R., &Helmke, T. (2010). Value orientations and motivational interference in school-leisure conflict: The case of Vietnam. Learning &Instruction, 20, 239-249.

37.

Hoy, W. (2012). School characteristics that make a difference for the achievement of all students:A 40-year odyssey. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 76-97.

38.

Hue, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

39.

Jang, H. & Reeve, J. (2006). Engaging students in learning activities: It’s not autonomy support structure but autonomous support and structure. Paper presented at the 115 annual convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, August, 2006.

40.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009) Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644-661.

41.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(2nd ed.). New York:Guilford Press.

42.

Legault, L., Green-Demers, I. & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582.

43.

Lepper, M. R, Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2). 184-196.

44.

Leroy, N., & Bressoux, P. (2016). Does amotivation matter more than motivation in predicting mathematics learning gains? A longitudinal study of sixth-grade students in France. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 41-53.

45.

Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424-436.

46.

Ntoumanis, N., Pensgaard, A., Martin, C., & Pipe, K. (2004). An idiographic analysis of amotivation in compulsory school physical education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 197-214.

47.

Nussbaum, A. D., & Steele, C. M. (2007). Situational disengagement and persistence in the face of adversity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 127-134.

48.

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.

49.

Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J., Larose, S., & Senecal, C. (2007). Autonomous, Controlled, and Amotivated Types of Academic Motivation: A Person-Oriented Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734-746.

50.

Reeve, J., Vansteenkist, M., Assor, A., Ahmade, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., Kaplan, H., Moss, J. D., Olaussen, B. S., & Wang, C. K. J.(2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93-110.

51.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

52.

Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., & Martin, J. (2008). The influence of domain specificity on motivation in physical education: Between and within domain relations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 333-343.

53.

Shen, B., Wingert, R.K., Li, W., Sun, H., &Rukavina, P.B. (2010). An Amotivation Model in Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 72-84.

54.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L.(2013). 학습동기. 서울대학교 창의센터역. 서울: 학지사.

55.

Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P.A. Alexander & P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd Edition) (pp. .349-367). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

56.

Soenens, B. & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of selfdetermination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589-604.

57.

Stephan, Y., Caudroit, J., Boiche, J., &Sarrazin, P. (2011). Predictors of situational disengagement in the academic setting: The contribution of grades, perceiverd competence, and academic motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 441-455.

58.

Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G.A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time:the unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 342-358.

59.

Tougas, F., Rinfret, N., Beaton, A. M., & De la Sablonni`ere, R. (2005). Policewomen acting in self-defense: Can psychological disengagement protect self-esteem from the negative outcomes of relative deprivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 790-800.

60.

Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.

logo