바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

친밀한 이성관계에서 성격이 관계만족 및 개입에 미치는 영향

The effects of personality on relationship satisfaction and commitment among couples

초록

이 연구는 성격특성들이 상호이해, 관계만족 및 관계개입에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 알아보기 위해서 실시되었다. 연애 중인 58쌍의 연인들이 연구에 참여하였으며, 이들은 5개 성격특성(외향성, 호감성, 성실성, 정서적 안정성, 및 개방성)과 성역할 성향(남성성, 여성성, 전통적 성역할신념), 관계변인들(상호이해, 관계만족, 및 관계개입)을 측정하는 문항들에 응답하였다. 먼저 여러 가지 성격특성과 관계변인들의 관련성을 살펴본 결과, 연인들은 두 사람 모두 외향적일수록 그리고 호감성 수준이 높을수록 서로 대화를 많이 하고 서로를 이해한다고 생각하였으며, 전통적 성역할신념에서 서로 불일치할수록 관계에 더 불만족하였다. 다음으로 어떤 성격특성이 남성과 여성의 상호이해, 관계만족 및 관계개입 수준에 영향을 미치는지 살펴보기 위해서 중다회귀 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 남성들은 자신이 호감성 수준이 높고 남성적일수록 서로를 잘 이해한다고 지각하였으며 관계에 더 만족하였다. 반면에 여성들은 외향적일수록 서로를 잘 이해한다고 지각하였으며, 상대 남성이 정서적으로 안정적일수록 관계에 더 만족하고 관계에 더 개입하였다. 이외에 상대 남성의 여성성도 관계 개입에 영향을 미쳐서 여성들은 상대 남성이 여성적일수록 관계에 더 개입하였다.

keywords
성격특성, 성역할성향, 상호이해, 관계만족, 관계개입, 이성관계, personality characteristics, sex-role, mutual comprehension, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment, personality characteristics, sex-role, mutual comprehension, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of personality characteristics within couples on mutual comprehension, relationship satisfaction, and commitment. Participants were 58 dating couples. Each subject responded to the IPIP(extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness/ intelligence), sex-role(masculinity, femininity, gender eglitarianism scale), and relationship measures(mutual comprehension, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment). First, we examined the relationships between personality and similarity and relationship measures. It turned out that couples' extraversion and agreeableness were correlated with mutual comprehension, and couples' gender eglitarianism index were correlated with relationship satisfaction. We did further analyses on personality factors that appeared to influence mutual comprehension, relationship satisfaction, and relationship commitment. The results were as follows: in case of men, agreeableness and masculinity played significant roles in mutual comprehension and relationship satisfaction. In case of women, extraversion was crucial to mutual comprehension and the neuroticism of partner was also important to relationship satisfaction and commitment.

keywords
성격특성, 성역할성향, 상호이해, 관계만족, 관계개입, 이성관계, personality characteristics, sex-role, mutual comprehension, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment, personality characteristics, sex-role, mutual comprehension, relationship satisfaction, relationship commitment

참고문헌

1.

(2000) 한국형 남녀평등의식검사(Korean Gender Egalitarianism Scale) 개발. ,

2.

(2002) 본인과 배우자의 성격특성이 결혼의 질에 미치는 영향 남편과 부인의 비교 연구,

3.

(2000) 부부의 MBTI 성격유형의 유사성과 의사소통 및 결혼만족도의 관계, 카톨릭대학교

4.

(1988) 부부의 성역할태도에 따른 결혼만족도 연구,

5.

(1990) 한국 성역할 검사(KSRI). ,

6.

(1984) 부부의 성역할태도와 결혼만족도에 관한 연구,

7.

(2003) 결혼만족검사의 개발,

8.

(1993) Perceptions of conflict in the first year of marriage How important are similarity and understanding? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,

9.

(1984) and feelings understood as predictors of communicative satisfaction in marital dyads Journal of Marriage and the Family,

10.

(1978) Longitudinal study of marital success and failure,

11.

(1991) Conflict in married couples Personality predictors of anger and upset Journal of Personality,

12.

(1997) Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage,

13.

(1963) Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives,

14.

(19991901) The 16 Personality Factors and the relationship satisfaction of couples,

15.

(1991) Relationships between attitudinal similarity Australian Journal of psychology,

16.

(1974) On the nature of marital relationships:Measurable differences in spontaneous agreement,

17.

(1981) The search for universals in personality lexicons Review of personality and social psychology,

18.

(2000181-213) On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect., John Wiley & Sons Ltd

19.

(1994) What Predicts divorce? The relationship between marital process and marital outcomes,

20.

(1999) A factor analysis of the most frequently used Korean personality trait adjectives,

21.

(1996) Compatibility and the development of premarital relationships,

22.

(1993) and then break our relationship? Journal of Social Issues,

23.

(2001) A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences,

24.

(1987) A propective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

25.

(1979) A social exchange view on the dissolution of pair relationships Social exchange in developing relationships, Academic Press

26.

(1992199-206) Marital satisfaction in Australia Australian Journal of Sex,

27.

(1970) Stimulus-Value-Role:a theory of marital choice,

28.

(1963) Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes:Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings,

29.

(19991917) Marital satisfaction as it relates to similarity versus complementarity in personality dimensions,

30.

(1983) A longitudinal test of the investment model of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexsual investments Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology,

31.

(1980) Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations:A test of the investment model,

32.

(1993) Commitment processes in close relationships:An interdependence analysis,

33.

(1997) Cues to infidelity,

34.

(1996) Betrayal and the design of the mind, Erlbaum.

35.

(1987) The dissolution of romantic relationships Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology,

36.

(1959) The Social Psychology of Groups,

logo