바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Study on the Measurement of Management Performance based on BSC: Examining Japanese Food Manufacturers

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2012, v.10 no.11, pp.11-20
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.10.11.201211.11
Park, Chul-Ju
Jeong, Tae-Seok
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose - This study attempts to measure the management performance of a food manufacturer using the BSC as one of the main business management techniques used to achieve the vision of a corporation. Research design, data, methodology - The measurement of business performance of a Japanese food manufacturer was conducted from four perspectives of BSC. Matsui (2005) developed the 'Cross-analysis chart'. Results - First, there were many cases where a minor wastage of raw materials was related to increasing costs. Second, the food manufacturer should try to recover the investment cost through significantly increasing the rate of the facility's operations. Third, reducing personnel expenses could be an important issue in labor-intensive manufacturing. Fourth, customer management was very important in the food manufacturing business. Finally, the food manufacturer should actively consider proposals influencing the food culture to secure high profits in the future. Conclusions - There were many limitations in applying these results to Korean food manufacturers, as this study applied to and analyzed the results in the context of the Japanese food manufacturer.

keywords
Balanced Scorecard (BSC), Measurement of Management Performance, Food Manufacturer, SWOT Analysis

Reference

1.

BSC Research Group (2006), Korean Style BSC Success Case, Seoul, Korea, Samsung Economic Research Institute.

2.

Choi, D. D., Jung, H. & Jung J. T. (2006), New BSC, Seoul, Korea, KOMIT.

3.

Collins, J. C. & Lazier, W. C. (1995), Beyond Entrepreneurship : Turning Your Business into an Enduring Great Company, NJ: Prentice Hall Press.

4.

Druker, P. (1998), Measuring Corporate Performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

5.

Eccles, R. G. (1991), “The Performance Measurement Manifesto”, Harvard Business Review, Jan./Feb., 131-137.

6.

Financial Supervisory Service (2011), “Data Analysis Retrieval and Transfer System”.

7.

Ittner, C. D. & Larcker, D. F. (1998), “Innovations in Performance Measurement : Trends and Research Implication”, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205-238.

8.

James, A. B. (1997), Activity Accounting : An Activity-Based Costing Approach, New York: Wiley.

9.

James, D. L. (2003), Marketing ROI : The Path to Campaign, Customer, and Corporate Profitability, Irwin: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Javad, D., Rosnah, M. Y. & Javad, J. (2011), “The Best Selection of Strategic Plans in Balanced Scorecard Using Multi-Objective Decision Making Mode”, African Journal of Business Management, 5 (3), 681-686.

11.

Kaplan. R. S. (2009), “Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard”, Harvard Business School, Working Paper, 10-74.

12.

Kaplan. R. S. (2010), “Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard”, Boston, Harvard Business School. 10-74.

13.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992), “The Balanced Scorecard : Measures that Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, Jan./Feb., 71-79.

14.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P.(1993), “Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work”, Harvard Business Review, Sept./Oct., 134-147.

15.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996a), “Using The Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System”, Harvard Business Review, Jan./Feb., 75-85.

16.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996b), The Balanced Scorecard : Translating Strategy into Action, Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

17.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2000), The Strategy-Focused Organization : How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Competitive Environment, Boston: Harvard Business Press.

18.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2004), Strategy Maps : Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes, Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

19.

Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2008), The Execution Premium : Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage, Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

20.

Kim, J. S. (2009), Present and Future of Agrifood Industry, Seoul, Korea: Baek-San Publishing Co.

21.

Kittiya, Y. & James, G. (2009), “Balance Scorecard Practices amongst Thai Companies : Performance Effects, Pacific Accounting Review, 21(2), 132-149.

22.

Kotler, P. & Keller, K. L. (2009), Marketing Management, NJ: Prentice Hall.

23.

Lokanandha, R. I. (2007), “Performance Measurement Using Balance Score Card”, KKC Institute of Technology and Engineering for Women, 1-8.

24.

Matsui, K. (2005), Sales Strategy by BSC, Tokyo, Japan: Nikkan,142-155.

25.

Mohan, N. (1999), Activity-Based Information: An Executive’s Guide to Implementation, NY: Wiley & Son.

26.

Palepu, K. G. & Healy, P. M. (2007), Business Analysis and Valuation : Using Financial Statements, Text and Cases, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Publishing.

27.

Paul R. N. (2005), Balanced Scorecard Diagnostics : Maintaining, Maximum, Performance, NY: Wiley & Son.

28.

Paul, W. F., Neil, T. Bendle, P. & Phillip, E. P. & David, J. R.(2010), Marketing Metrics : The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

29.

Porter. M. (1998), Competitive Strategy : Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press.

30.

Shin, H. J. & Lee, S. Y. (2010), “Study on Influence of Standardization of Agricultural Product Packages on Cost in Hypermarkets”, Journal of Distribution Science, 8(4), 35-41.

31.

Shin, I. S. (2009), Agrifood Industry, Seoul, Korea: Cheong Mok Publication, 314-318.

The Journal of Distribution Science