open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0718
This study purposed to examine the role of mutual exclusivity constraint versus pragmatic intention in inferring the meaning of Korean words. Three experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 addressed the issue by using the pictures of artifacts. Forty eight children whose age ranges from 3;0 to 3;11(M=3;7) were equally allocated to three conditions, i. e., an unintended condition, an explicitly intended condition, and an implicitly intended condition. The results showed that the mutual exclusivity of object labels were preserved in the unintended condition, while being overridden by the pragmatic intention in the explicitly intended condition. The procedure of experiment 2 was the same as that of experiment 1, except using the pictures of animals. Forty eight children whose age ranges from 2;11 to 4;0 (M=3;7) participated. The results replicated the findings of experiment 1 with respect to the role of mutual exclusivity vs. intention in word learning. In addition, children showed the tendency of understanding the novel words as category names in the explicitly intended condition. The procedure of experiment 3 was the same as that of the previous experiments, except using the pictures of human beings. Forty eight children whose age ranges from 3;0 to 4;1 (M=3;8) participated. The results in general replicated the previous findings with respect to the role of mutual exclusivity vs. intention in word learning. In addition, children showed the tendency of understanding the novel word as a proper name in the explicitly intended condition. Summing up, the mutual exclusivity constraint could play a role in Korean word learning, but it could be overcome when being faced with the conflicted pragmatic intention. Moreover, children might treat a novel word as a proper name so as to override the mutual exclusivity of objects when they were attributed to intentionality.
(2000) 한국어 단어의미 추론에서 존재론적 개념 형태복잡성의 역할,
(1996) Twenty-four month old children learn words for absent objects and actions British Journal of Developmental Psychology,
(1990) The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning To honor or not to honor? Child Development,
(1996) Infants' reliance on a social criterion for establishing word-object relations,
(2000) How Children Learn the Meanings of Words, MIT Press
(1998) Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations,
(1978) The child as word learner, MIT Press
(1987) The principle of contrast A constraint on language acquisition Mechanism of language acquisition,
(2001) Children's Avoidance of Lexical Overlap: A Pragmatic Account. ,
(1998) Shape and representational status in children's early naming,
(1984) How two-year- old children interpret proper and common names for unfamiliar objects,
(1994) Semantic constraints on word learning,
(2000) an emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 65,
(2001) Learning proper and common names in inferential versus ostensive contexts,
(1974) What's in a name; A study of how children learn common and proper names,
(1988) The Importance of Shape in Early Lexical Learning,
(1994) Sixteen- and 24-month-olds' use of mutual exclusivity as a default assumption in second- label learning,
(1991) and mutual exclusivity assumption as intial constraints on word meanings Perspectives in language and thought Interrelation in Development, Cambridge University Press
(1994) Constraints of word meaning in early language acquisition, MIT Press
(2003) Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners,
(1988) Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words,
Construing young children's word mappings in indirect label learning A lexical or pragmatic choice? Manuscript in preparation,
(2001) Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life, Blackwell Publishers
(1994) Learning words in non-ostensive contexts,
(1997) Handbook of child psychology,