open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0718
The current research examined whether Korean adults and children use a locative case marker to learn the meaning of novel nouns. During familiarization, participants watched the videos of spatial relations between 2 objects(ex: a teddy bear in a basket) and heard sentences including a novel noun following a locative case marker ‘ey’(ex: wubby-ey issta). During test, participants saw either a scene about a novel spatial relation between the same objects(object match: the teddy bear in front of the basket) or a scene about the same spatial relation between new objects(location match: a puppy in a bag). They were asked to choose an event including the referent of the novel noun. In Experiment 1, adults chose the location match, suggesting that they interpreted the novel nouns followed by ‘ey’ as locative terms. In Experiment 2, 5-year-olds but not 3-year-olds, showed the same pattern as the adults in Experiment 1. These results add to the evidence on the development of ability to use morphological cues when learning the meaning of spatial terms.
권도하, 정분선 (2000). 2～5세 아동의 조사 발달연구. 언어치료연구, 9, 139-163.
배소영 (2002). MCDI-K 유아용. 한국영아발달연구센터.
배소영 (2006). 한국어 발달특성과 학령전기 문법 형태소. 한국어학, 31(0), 31-45.
배소영, 곽금주, 김미배, 이현숙, 정경희 (2008). M-B CDI-Korean 축약판 개발. 음성과학, 15(2), 119-129.
서상규 (1998). 말뭉치 분석에 기반을 둔 낱말 빈도의 조사와 그 응용-‘연세 말뭉치’를 중심으로. 한글, 242, 225-270.
유현경 (2007). 조사 ‘에를’의 범주와 의미. 언어, 32, 105-123.
이숙 (2007). 한국어에 나타나는 이동의 어휘화 형식. 이중언어학, 33, 169-188.
이순형 (2000). 한국아동이 초기에 획득한 문법적 형태소의 종류 및 획득 시기. 아동학회지, 21(4), 51-68.
이우열, 송현주 (2009). 형태론적 단서가 만 2세 아동의 새로운 동사학습에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지 : 발달, 22(4), 111-123.
이윤하, 송현주 (2010). 한국 아동의 조사를 이용한 새로운 명사 학습. 한국심리학회지 : 발달, 23(1), 103-117.
이인섭 (1976). 유아어휘. 서울여대 논문집, 5, 17-45.
이인섭 (1986). 한국 아동의 언어 발달 연구. 박사학위논문. 고려대학교 대학원.
장유경 (2004). 한국 영아의 초기 어휘발달: 18개월∼36개월. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 17, 91-105.
최은희 (2000). 한국 아동의 어휘 발달 연구: 13-30개월 아동을 대상으로. 석사학위논문. 연세대학교 대학원.
Adams, A., & Gathercole, S. E. (2000). Limitatins in working memory: Implications for language development. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 95–116.
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. Mechanisms of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 157-93.
Bowerman, M. & Choi, S. (2003). Space under construction: Language specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the study of Language and Cognition (pp. 387-428). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Casasola, M., Cohen, L.B., & Chiarello, E. (2003). Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Development, 74, 1-15.
Choi, S. (1993). Development of locative case markers in Korean. In P. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics Vol. 2 (pp. 205-222). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Choi, S. (1997). Language-specific input and early semantic development: Evidence from children learning Korean. In D. Slobin (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 5: Expanding Contexts. (pp. 41-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fisher, C., Klingler, S., & Song, H. (2006). What does syntax say about space? 2-year-olds use sentence structure to learn new prepositions. Cognition, 101, B19-B29.
Gentner, D., & Loewenstein, J. (2002). Relational language and relational thought. In J. Byrnes & E. Amsel (Eds.), Language, Literacy, and Cognitive Development (pp. 87-120). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Goksun, T., Kuntay, A. C., & Naigles, L. (2008). Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 35, 291-323.
Levinson, C. S. (2003). Space in language and cognition. London: Cambridge University Press.
Quinn, P. C. (2005). Developmental constraints on the representation of spatial relation information: Evidence from verbal infants. In L.A. Carlson & E. van der Zee (Eds.), Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorization, and development. New York: Oxford University Press.