바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

양보 행동 동기가 감정에 미치는 영향에 대한 한국 성인과 학령 전기 아동의 이해

Korean adults’ and preschoolers’ understanding of the relationship between the motivation of others’ sharing behaviors and others’ emotions

초록

본 연구는 친사회적 행동의 동기에 따라 감정이 달라질 수 있음을 이해하는 능력의 발달을 알아보고자 하였다. 한국 성인(실험 1)과 한국 아동 만 5, 6세(실험 2)에게 양보 행동을 하는 행위자의 바람이 충족 또는 비충족 되는지(공을 양보한 뒤 자신도 가지고 놀 수 있게 되는지 또는 상대방만 가지고 놀게 되는지)와 그러한 양보 행동의 동기가 내적 또는 외적인 동기에 의해 이루어지는지(자신 스스로 양보하는지와 엄마가 시켜서 양보하는지)에 따라 달라지는 여러 이야기를 들려준 후 행위자의 감정이 어떨지(좋은지, 나쁜지, 그저 그런지)에 대해 추론하게 하였다. 성인, 아동 모두 행위자의 바람이 충족되지 않았을 때보다 바람이 충족되었을 때 더 긍정적인 감정을 느낀다고 추론하였고, 타의로 양보하였을 때보다 자의로 양보하였을 때 더 긍정적인 정서를 보고하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 만 5, 6세 아동들도 자신의 바람 충족 여부뿐만이 아닌 친사회적 행동의 동기에 따라 정서가 영향을 받을 수 있음을 이해하고 있다는 것을 보여준다.

keywords
감정, 바람, 동기, 친사회적 행동, 양보 행동, emotions, desires, motivations, prosocial behavior, sharing behavior

Abstract

The present study examined whether adults and children can understand that the motivation (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) of prosocial behaviors can influence others’ emotions. Korean adults(Experiment 1) and 5- to 6-year-old children(Experiment 2) were asked to indicate the protagonist's emotions after listening to a series of stories. The stories varied on (1) whether or not the protagonist's desire was fulfilled after sharing his or her desired object and (2) whether his or her prosocial behavior had intrinsic or extrinsic motivation. Both adults and children reasoned that the protagonist would feel better when his/her desire was fulfilled than when his/her desire was not fulfilled. In addition, both adults and children reasoned that the protagonist would feel better when he or she shared the desired object with others voluntarily(intrinsic motivation) than involuntarily (extrinsic motivation). The results demonstrate children's understanding that others' emotions can be affected by the motivations of prosocial behaviors.

keywords
투고일Submission Date
2013-01-15
수정일Revised Date
2013-02-21
게재확정일Accepted Date
2013-02-22

참고문헌

1.

원정애, 송현주 (2009). 타인의 감정, 바람, 친사회적 행동에 대한 한국 아동의 이해. 한국심리학회지: 발달. 22(4), 57-71.

2.

이현진 (2009). 한국 아동에서 살펴본 바람, 의도, 정서, 사회적 규칙의 이해. 한국심리학회지: 발달. 22(1), 1-18.

3.

전명숙, 김혜리 (1999). 정서추론으로 살펴본 믿음과 바람에 대한 아동의 이해. 인간발달연구, 6(1), 102-121.

4.

Arsenio, W. F. (1988). Children's conceptions of the situational affective consequences of sociomoral events. Child Development, 59, 1611-1622.

5.

Arsenio, W. F., & Kramer, R. (1992). Victimizers and their victims: Children's conceptions of the mixed emotional consequences of moral transgressions. Child Development, 63, 915-927.

6.

Astington, J. W., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Developing understanding of desire and intention. In A Whiten(ED.), Natural theories of mind. Oxford, U. K.: Blackwell.

7.

Bar-Tal, D. (1982). Sequential development of helping behavior: A cognitive-learning approach. Developmental Review, 2, 101-124.

8.

Cialdini, R. B., Baumann, D. J., & Kenrick, D. T. (1981). Insights from sadness: A three-step model of the development of altruism as hedonism. Developmental Review, 1, 207-223.

9.

Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. A. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1998). Meta-analyses of age and sex differences in children's and adolescents' prosocial behavior. Working paper, Arizona State University.

11.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223-237.

13.

Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., Keller, M., Parsons, K., & Hummel, A. (2010). Preschoolers' allocations in the dictator game: The role of moral emotions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 25-34.

14.

Keller, M., Gummerum, M., Wang, X., & Lindsey, S. (2004). Understanding perspectives and emotions in contract violation: Development of deontic and moral reasoning. Child Development, 74, 614-635.

15.

Koehn, D. (1998). Rethinking feminist ethics: Care, trust, and empathy. London: Routledge.

16.

Kujala, J., & Pietilainen, T. (2004). Female managers' ethical decision-making: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 153-163.

17.

Lagattuta, K. H. (2005). When you shouldn't do what you want to do: Young children's understanding of desires, rules, and emotions. Child Development, 76(3), 716-733.

18.

Núñez, M., & Harris, P. L. (1998). Psychological and deontic concepts: Separate domains or intimate connection. Mind and Language, 13, 153-170.

19.

Nunner-Winkler, G., & Sodian, B. (1988). Children's understanding of moral emotions. Child Development, 59, 1323-1338.

20.

Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, P. (2002). Mindreading and moral awareness in popular and rejected preschoolers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 205-224.

21.

Power, T. G.. & Shanks, J. A. (1989). Parents as socializers: Maternal and paternal views. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 203-220.

22.

Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1785-1788.

23.

Wellman, H. M., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2000). Developing understanding of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed, pp. 21-49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Wellman, H. M., Phillips, A. T., & Rodriguez, T. (2001). Young children's understanding of perception, desire, and emotion. Child Development, 71(4), 895-912.

25.

Wellman, H. M., & Woolley, J. D. (1990). From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition, 35, 245-275.

logo