바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The development of Korean children’s abilities to use structural cues for sentence comprehension

Abstract

The present study used a preferential looking paradigm to examine the types of structural cues used by 24- and 21-months-old Korean children when processing the meaning of sentences with a novel verb in Korean. In the first two of the three experiments, participants were shown two videos positioned adjacent to each other, depicting independent or causative behaviors, and were made to listen to sentences with a nominative or accusative case marker. It was found that in Experiment 1, the 24-month-old infants looked at causative rather than independent behaviors for longer in the accusative condition, but not in the nominative condition. In Experiment 2, the 21-month old infants looked at independent behaviors for longer durations regardless of the sentence type. In Experiment 3, one- and two-noun sentences were used without any case markers. The 21-month old infants looked at causative behaviors for longer when hearing two-noun rather than one-noun sentences. These results suggest that by the age of 24 months, Korean children use morphological cues when understanding the meaning of a novel verb, while younger children might exploit the number of noun cues rather than case markers.

keywords
Submission Date
2013-10-15
Revised Date
2013-12-04
Accepted Date
2013-12-04

Reference

1.

송현주, 최유정, 김민영 (2008). 한국어에서 담화 정보가 학령 전 아동의 문장 이해에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 21(3), 81-97.

2.

이우열, 송현주 (2009). 형태론적 단서가 만 2세 아동의 새로운 동사학습에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 22(4), 111-123.

3.

이윤하, 송현주 (2010a). 한국 아동의 조사를 이용한 새로운 명사 학습. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 23(1), 103-117.

4.

이윤하, 송현주 (2010b). 한국 아동과 성인의 처소격 조사를 활용한 공간 명사의 의미 이해. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 23(4), 17-31.

5.

최영은 (2010). 한국어 복합 동사 습득 기제 연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 23(3), 125- 139.

6.

Choi, S. (2000). Caregiver input in English and Korean: use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27(1), 69-96.

7.

Clancy, P. (2009). The acquisition of argument structure and transitivity in Korean: A discourse-functional approach. In P. Li (ed.), Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, part Ⅲ: Korean Psycholinguistics, C. Lee, Y. Kim, and G. Simpson (eds.). London: Cambridge University Press.

8.

Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., Nubila, J. A., & Voulumanos, A. (2006). From semantics to syntax and back again: Argument structure in the third year of life. Cognition 100, B10-B20.

9.

Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in children's interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 41-81.

10.

Fisher, C., Gertner, Y., Scott, R. M., & Yuan, S. (2010). Syntactic bootstrapping. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 143-149.

11.

Fisher, C., Klingler, S. L., Song, H. (2006). What does syntax say about space? 2-year-olds use sentence structure to learn new prepositions. Cognition, 101(1), B19-B29.

12.

Gleitman, L., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1(1), 23-64.

13.

Göksun, T., Küntay, A. C., & Naigles, L. (2008). Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 35, 291-323.

14.

Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (1996). The origins of grammar: Evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

15.

Imai, M., Li, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., & Shigematsu, J. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children. Child Development, 79, 979-1000.

16.

Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. (1985). Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

17.

Lee, J. N., & Naigles, L. R. (2008). Mandarin learners use syntactic bootstrapping in verb acquisition. Cognition, 106(2), 1028-1037.

18.

Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (2003). Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar. Cognition, 87(3), 151-178.

19.

Matsuo, A., Kita, S., Shinya, Y., Wood, G. C., & Naigles, L. (2012). Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 637-663.

20.

Naigles, L. R. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17, 357-374.

21.

Naigles, L. G., & Kako, E. T. (1993). First Contact in Verb Acquisition: Defining a Role for Syntax. Child Development, 64(6), 1665- 1687.

22.

Song, H. & Fisher, C. (2005). Who's “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers' comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 29-57.

23.

Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse promience effects on 2.5-year-old children's interpretation of pronouns. Lingua, 117, 1959- 1987.

24.

Yuan, S., & Fisher, C. (2009). “Really? She blicked the baby?”: Two-year-olds learn combinatorial facts about verbs by listening. Psychological Science, 20(5), 619-626.

25.

Yuan, S., Fisher, C., & Snedeker, J. (2012). Counting the nouns: Simple structural cues to verb meaning. Child Development, 83(4), 1382- 1399.

logo