바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The parental influence on social comparison in 5- to 6-year-old Korean children

Abstract

The current study investigated the social comparison of 5- to 6-year-old Korean children. Children chose one of two options in which distributions had already been made between participating children and anonymous children. In the disadvantageous inequality condition, the children had to choose the disadvantageous inequality option (2:3) or the equality option (1:1). In the advantageous inequality condition, the children had to choose the advantageous inequality option (1:0) or the equality option (2:2). We also measured the mothers’ face culture orientation, social comparison, Machiavellianism, and empathy. In the disadvantageous inequality condition, the children were more likely to choose the equality option when the magnitude of the difference between the distributions was large, than when the magnitude of the difference was small. In the advantageous inequality condition, the children were more likely to choose the advantageous inequality option than they were in the control condition. These results demonstrate that 5- to 6-year-old Korean children have social comparison concern. The social comparison orientation of the children was related to the psychological factors pertaining to their mother; a high level of face culture orientation, high desire for status and low level of personal distress. The current study provides experimental evidence with regard to the social comparison of Korean children as well as useful information about the caregiver as an influential factor in this process.

keywords
Submission Date
2016-01-15
Revised Date
2016-02-24
Accepted Date
2016-02-29

Reference

1.

박지숙, 박영신 (2013). 독재자 게임으로 살펴본 아동의 이타적 행동의 발달, 성차와조망수용의 역할. 사회과학 담론과 정책, 6(1), 167-186.

2.

설선혜, 이민우, 김학진 (2014). 이타적 강화학습과제를 이용한 이타성의 측정. 심리학회지: 일반, 33(2), 485-507.

3.

이종원 (2011). 개인-조직 부합도와 마키아벨리즘이 조직정치지각에 미치는 영향. 아주대학교대학원 석사학위 논문.

4.

Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2007). Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 168-175.

5.

Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K. (2011). “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120(2), 215-224.

6.

Blanton, H., Crocker, J., & Miller, D. T. (2000). The effects of in-group versus out-group social comparison on self-esteem in the context of a negative stereotype. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(5), 519-530.

7.

Callaghan, T., Moll, H., Rakoczy, H., Warneken, F., Liszkowski, U., & Behne, T., et al. (2011). Early social cognition in three cultural contexts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(2), 1-142.

8.

Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

9.

Chung, T., & Mallery, P. (1999). Social comparison, individualism-collectivism, and selfesteem in China and the United States. Current Psychology, 18(4), 340-352.

10.

Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of anew Machiavellianism scale. Journal of management, 35(2), 219-257.

11.

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.

12.

Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079-1083.

13.

Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: The development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 129-142.

14.

Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., Keller, M., Parsons, K., & Hummel, A. (2010). Preschoolers’allocations in the dictator game: The role of moral emotions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 25-34.

15.

Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8(2), 111-120.

16.

Kang, P., Lee, Y., Choi, I., & Kim, H. (2013). Neural evidence for individual and cultural variability in the social comparison effect. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(41), 16200-16208.

17.

Leung, A. K.-Y., & Cohen, D. (2011). Withinand between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507-526.

18.

Levine, J. M., & Green, S. M. (1973). Social comparison of grades: The influence of mode of comparison and machiavellianism. Journal of Social Psychology, 91(1), 67-72.

19.

LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J. S., & Haidt, J. (2009). When getting something good is bad: Even three-year-olds react to inequality. Social Development, 20(1), 154-170.

20.

McCrink, K., Bloom, P., & Santos, L. R. (2010). Children’s and adults’ judgments of equitable resource distributions. Developmental Science, 13(1), 37-45.

21.

Sheskin, M., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2014). Anti-equality: Social comparison in young children. Cognition, 130(2), 152-156.

22.

Steinbeis, N., & Singer, T. (2013). The effects of social comparison on social emotions and behavior during childhood: The ontogeny of envy and schadenfreude predicts developmental changes in equity-related decisions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 198-209.

23.

Wayment, H. A., Taylor, S. E., & Taylor, S. E. (1995). Self-evaluation processes: Motives, information use, and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 63(4), 729-757.

logo