바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Development of disfluency use in inferring speakers’ intention

Abstract

Disfluencies, such as filled pauses, signal listeners that the speaker is hesitant or is about to refer to a novel entity not mentioned in prior discourse. Prior research demonstrated that 3-year-olds can detect hesitation from a filled pause inserted in speech and infer speakers’-true state of mind using such disfluencies. The present study examined whether this ability emerges earlier than age 3, considering the early abilities of inferring referential intent observed among English 2-year-olds. We presented two animal puppets who responded differently to a toy offer by the experimenter: one answered with hesitation marker “uh” while the other answered fluently without hesitation. Then the children were asked to give the toy to one of the two animals. Overall results showed that 2-year-olds selected the animals who answered without hesitation as the recipient of the offered item. However, only the girls’ selection of the correct animal reached statistical significance, showing a similar pattern to the one reported with 3-year-olds. These results suggest that the ability to detect and use disfluency in inferring others’ state of mind begin to develop around two years of age.

keywords
Submission Date
2016-10-15
Revised Date
2016-11-19
Accepted Date
2016-11-29

Reference

1.

김영철 (2006). 국어 담화표지 ‘어’의 고찰. 국어문학, 41, 249-266.

2.

남길임 (2011). 담화 유형에 따른 한국어 비유창성 현상 연구. 담화와인지, 18(3), 115-138.

3.

전희정, 고도흥, 신문자 (2004). 유창성장애 아동과 정상 아동의 비유창성과 말속도에관한 비교 연구. 언어청각장애연구, 9(2), 102-115.

4.

전영옥 (2015). 감탄사 “어”와 “응”의 담화 기능 연구. 언어와 언어학, 69, 129-161.

5.

주나래, 최영은 (2015). 만 3세 아동의 비유창성 표현을 통한 화자의 마음 상태 추론. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28(4), 261-274.

6.

Arnold, J. E., Fagnano, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2003). Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 25-36.

7.

Arnold, J. E., Kam, C. L. H., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 914-930

8.

Arnold, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Disfluency effects in comprehension: How new information can become accessible. In E. Gibson & N. J. Pearlmutter (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (197-217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

9.

Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. J., & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new disfluency and reference resolution. Psychological Science, 15(9), 578-582.

10.

Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & Bian, L. (2016). Psychological reasoning in infancy. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 159-186.

11.

Banerjee, M. (1997). Hidden emotions:Preschoolers’ knowledge of appearance-reality and emotion display rules. Social Cognition, 15(2), 107-132.

12.

Berman, J. M., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2010). Preschoolers’ appreciation of speaker vocal affect as a cue to referential intent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(2), 87-99.

13.

Blasi, A., Mercure, E., Lloyd-Fox, S., Thomson, A., Brammer, M., Sauter, D., Deeley, Q., Barker, G. J., Renvall, V., Deoni, S., Gasston, D., Williams, S. C., Johnson, M. H., Simmons, A., & Murphy, D. G. (2011). Early specialization for voice and emotion processing in the infant brain. Current Biology, 21(14), 1220-1224.

14.

Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and speech, 44(2), 123-147.

15.

Bosacki, S. L., & Moore, C. (2004). Preschoolders’understanding of simple and complex emotions: Links with gender and language. Sex Roles, 50(9), 659-675.

16.

Bosker, H. R., Quené, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H. (2014). Native ‘um’s elicit prediction of low-frequency referents, but non-native ‘um’s do not. Journal of memory and language, 75, 104-116.

17.

Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of Another’ s Knowing: prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 383-398.

18.

Calero, C. I., Salles, A., Semelman, M., & Sigman, M. (2013). Age and gender depedent development of theory of mind in 6- to 8-years old children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7: 281.

19.

Cheng, Y., Lee, S. Y., Chen, H. Y., Wang, P. Y., & Decety, J. (2012). Voice and emotion processing in the human neonatal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1411-1419.

20.

Chevallier, C., Noveck, I., Happé, F., & Wilson, D. (2011). What’s in a voice? Prosody as a test case for the Theory of Mind account of autism. Neuropsychologia, 49(3), 507-517.

21.

Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73-111.

22.

Clements W. A., Perner J. (1994). Implicit understanding of belief. Cognitive Development, 9(4), 377-395.

23.

Eklund, R., & Shriberg, E. (1998). Crosslinguistic dis¯uency modeling: a comparative analysis of Swedish and American English human-human and human-machine dialogues. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, vol. 6, 2631-2634. Sydney:Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.

24.

Eriksson, M., Marschik, P. B., Tulviste, T., Almgren, M., Pérez Pereira, M., Wehberg, S., Marjanovič-Umek, L., Gayraud, F., Kovacevic, M., & Gallego, C. (2012). Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills:Evidence from 10 language communities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(2), 326-343.

25.

Fernald, A. (1993). Approval and disapproval:Infant responsiveness to vocal affect in familiar and unfamiliar languages. Child Development, 64(3), 657-674.

26.

Flom, R., & Bahrick, L. E. (2007). The development of infant discrimination of affect in multimodal and unimodal stimulation: The role of intersensory redundancy. Developmental Psychology, 43(1), 238-252.

27.

Friend, M. (2000). Developmental changes in sensitivity to vocal paralanguage. Developmental Science, 3(2), 148-162.

28.

Gil, S., Aguert, M., Le Bigot, L., Lacroix, A., & Laval, V. (2014). Children’s understanding of others’ emotional states: Inferences from extralinguistic or paralinguistic cues? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(6), 539-549.

29.

Grossmann, T., Striano, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Infants’ electric brain responses to emotional prosody. NeuroReport, 16(16), 1825-1828.

30.

Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 845-857.

31.

Kam, C. L. H., & Edwards, N. A. (2008). The use of uh and um by 3-and 4-year-old native English-speaking children: Not quite right but not completely wrong. First Language, 28(3), 313-327.

32.

Kidd, C., White, K. S., & Aslin, R. N. (2011). Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers’ referential intentions. Developmental Science, 14(4), 925-934.

33.

Morton, J. B., & Trehub, S. E. (2001). Children’s understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development, 72(3), 834-843.

34.

Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308(5719), 255-258.

35.

Orena, A. J., & White, K. S. (2015). I forget what that’s called! Children’s online processing of disfluencies depends on speaker knowledge. Child development, 86(6), 1701-1709.

36.

Quam, C., & Swingley, D. (2012). Development in children’s interpretation of pitch cues to emotions. Child Development, 83(1), 236-250.

37.

Owens, S. J., & Graham, S. A. (2016). Thee, uhh disfluency effect in preschoolers: A cue to discourse status. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 388-401.

38.

Repacholi, B. M., & Gopnik, A. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: evidence from 14-and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 12-21.

39.

Sakkalou, E., & Gattis, M. (2012). Infants infer intentions from prosody. Cognitive Development, 27(1), 1-16.

40.

Shriberg, E. (1996). Disfluencies in Switchboard. Proceedings, International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP ’96), Vol. Addendum, 11-14. Philadelphia. PA.

logo