바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Effects of Effort - VS. Trait-based Success Expectation on Children’s Task Performance

Abstract

Upon experiencing failure, others’ expectation for success can backfire and hurt an individual’s performance when stated explicitly. The current study examined the effects of different types of success expectations (trait- vs. effort-based) that influence children’s performance. Across two experiments, 131 five- and six-year-old children completed a novel and challenging drawing task. After experiencing failure, children in the trait-based expectation condition performed worse than did those in the effort-based and no feedback conditions. These findings suggest that the effects of success expectations vary largely depending on the attribution of the expectations. Theoretically, the current study expands research on theory of intelligence by demonstrating that detrimental effects of trait feedback apply to the domain of success expectations. Practically, the current investigation provides an effective way to encourage children after experiencing failure.

keywords
Submission Date
2016-10-08
Revised Date
2016-11-20
Accepted Date
2016-11-29

Reference

1.

김억곤, 최경숙 (2008). 작업기억과 수학학습수행과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 21(1), 15-30.

2.

이명은, 서은란, 성형란 (2014). 성공상황에서칭찬유형이 성취목표 지향성에 미치는 영향. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 14(2), 383-401.

3.

이인선 (2013). 표현적 글쓰기가 작업기억에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 27(1), 221-240.

4.

정윤경 (2012). 아동의 목표 지향성에 따른 능력 칭찬과 노력 칭찬이 성취관련 태도에미치는 영향. 인간발달연구, 19(4), 81-98.

5.

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113-125.

6.

Baumeister, R. F., Hamilton, J. C., & Tice, D. M. (1985). Public versus private expectancy of success: Confidence booster or performance pressure?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1447.

7.

Beilock, S. L. (2008). Math performance in stressful situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(5), 339-343.

8.

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263.

9.

Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11(5), 399-402.

10.

Cimpian, A., Arce, H. M. C., Markman, E. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Subtle linguistic cues affect children's motivation. Psychological Science, 18(4), 314-316.

11.

Dweck, C. S. (September 22, 2015). Carol Dweck revisits the ‘growth mindset’. Education Week. Retrived from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/09/23/carol-dweck-revisits-the-gr owth-mindset.html

12.

Dweck, C. S. (2002). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

13.

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.

14.

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645-662.

15.

Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin‐Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1‐to 3‐year‐olds predicts children's motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84(5), 1526-1541.

16.

Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835-847.

17.

Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 75-86.

18.

Mendoza-Denton, R., Kahn, K., & Chan, W. (2008). Can fixed views of ability boost performance in the context of favorable stereotypes?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1187-1193.

19.

Miele, D. B., Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). Children's naive theories of intelligence influence their metacognitive judgments. Child Development, 84(6), 1879-1886.

20.

Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33-52.

21.

Park, D., Schaeffer, M. W., Nolla, K. M., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (in press). How do generic statements impact performance? Evidence for entity beliefs. Developmental Science.

22.

Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187-202.

23.

Rhodes, M., & Brickman, D. (2008). Preschoolers'responses to social comparisons involving relative failure. Psychological Science, 19(10), 968-972.

24.

Rochat, P. (2003). Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 717-731.

25.

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The Urban Review, 3, 16-20.

26.

Seta, C. E., & Seta, J. J. (1995). When audience presence is enjoyable: The influence of audience awareness of prior success on performance and task interest. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16(1-2), 95-108.

27.

Smith, A. E., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1999). Do self-fulfilling prophecies accumulate, dissipate, or remain stable over time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 548-565.

logo