Sex Differences of Gender Category Representation in Implicit Association Test

이재호

doi:10.18205/kpa.2007.12.1.001

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.12 No.1

Citation
Share

Sex Differences of Gender Category Representation in Implicit Association Test

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726;

2007, v.12 no.1, pp.1-20

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2007.12.1.001

(2007). Sex Differences of Gender Category Representation in Implicit Association Test. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 12(1), 1-20, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2007.12.1.001

copy

Abstract

This study conducted two experiments using implicit association test (IAT) to explore the sex difference of implicit representation for gender category. In Experiment 1, the manipulated variable was the attribute preference of gender category. The difference of IAT score for the attribute preference was obtained between female participants and male participants. The IAT score of female participants was larger than for male participants. In Experiment 2, the manipulated variable was the attribute typicality of gender category. The difference of IAT score for attribute typicality revealed no sex difference. These results were discussed from a point of view of dynamic representation of gender category in implicit level.

keywords: social cognition, gender category, sex difference, IAT, social cognition, gender category, sex difference, IAT, 사회 인지, 성별 범주, 성차, 암묵연합검사 사람들은 기억에 많은 정보를 지니고 있으며 범주(category)라는 정신적 구조로 표상되어 있다. 범주는 복잡한 정보들을 분류하는 체계를 제공하기 때문에 수많은 정보가 효율적으로 기억에 저장되고 처리될 수 있게 한다(이재호와 이정모, 2000, Medin, Lynch, & Solomon, 2000, Murphy & Lassaline, 1997). 범주는 범주를 구성하는 구성원이 있으며 그 구성원이

Reference

이재호 (2006). 성별 고정관념의 암묵적 표상과 자동적 점화. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 11, 41-61.

이재호, 김성일 (1998). 언어 이해과정의 연구 방법. 이정모, 이재호 (편), 인지심리학의 제 문제 II: 언어와 인지 (155-182쪽). 서울: 학지사.

이재호, 방희정 (2003). 성별 고정관념의 암묵적 표상: 성별의 속성 전형성과 집단 일치성의 점화효과. 인지과학, 14, 37-48.

이재호, 방희정, 최상진 (2004). 한국인의 성별 지식의 암묵적 표상: 남녀 범주의 비대칭성. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 9, 83-102.

이재호, 이정모 (2000). 개념 지식의 유형에 따른 표상 차이: 범주와 각본의 위계성과 전형성 비교. 인지과학, 11, 73-81.

이재호, 오경기, 김미라, 조긍호 (2000). 성별 선호도의 긍정-부정성이 자동적 평가에 미치는 효과. 2000년도 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 발표논문집, 224-225.

이재호, 조긍호, 오경기, 김미라 (2001). 사회적 범주의 암묵적 표상 구조: 성별 고정관념의 비대칭적 점화효과. 인지과학, 12, 43-54.

이재호, 조혜자, 방희정 (2001). 성별 고정관념의 암묵적 표상구조: 성별단서, 범주전형성 및 성별 선호도의 상호작용. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 6, 49-67.

조혜자, 방희정 (2006). 암묵적인 자기 범주화의 성차. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 11, 245-265.

10.

Aidman, V. A., & Carroll, S. M. (2003). Implicit individual differences: Relationships between implicit self-esteem, gender identity, gender attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 17, 19-37.

11.

Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.

12.

Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.

13.

Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.

14.

Banaji, M., & Hardin, C. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.

15.

Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142-1163.

16.

Carpenter, S. J. (2000). Implicit gender attitudes. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University, CT.

17.

De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., & Spruyt, A. (2001). Affective priming of pronunciation reponses: Effects of target degradation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 85-91.

18.

Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991- 1004.

19.

Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.

20.

Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., & Araya, T. (2003). Gender differences in implicit prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences. 34, 1509-1523.

21.

Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu. D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50. 229-238.

22.

Fiske, S. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th Ed.) (pp. 357-411). NY: McGrawHill.

23.

Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.

24.

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitude, self- esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.

25.

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). An unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self- concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.

26.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

27.

Klauer, K. C., Rossnagel, C., & Musch, J. (1997). List-context effects in evaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 246-255.

28.

Kunda, Z. (2000). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

29.

Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. L. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193-217.

30.

Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology. 51, 93-120.

31.

McGarty, C. (1999). Categorization in social psychology. London: SAGE Publications.

32.

Medin, D. L., Lynch, E. B., & Solomon, K. O. (2000). Are there kinds of concepts? Annual Review of Psychology. 51, 121-147.

33.

Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

34.

Murphy, G. L., & Lassaline, M. E. (1997). Hierarchical structure in concepts and the basic level of categorization. In K. Lamberts & D. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts, and categories (pp. 93-132). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

35.

Rothbart, M., Sriram, N., & Davis-Stitt, C. (1996). The retrieval of typical and atypical category members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1-29.

36.

Rudman, L. A., & Goowin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do woman like woman more than man like man? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 494-509.

37.

Rudman, L. Greenwald, A., & McGhee, D. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164-1178.

38.

Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

39.

Vonk, R. (2002). Effects of stereotypes on attitude inference: Out-groups are black and white, in-groups are shaded. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 157-167.

40.

Wittenbrink, W., Judd, C., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262-274.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.12 No.1

Sex Differences of Gender Category Representation in Implicit Association Test

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology