Gender difference in self-leadership and its impact on the effectiveness of college life

한영석; 김명소

doi:10.18205/kpa.2010.15.2.003

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.15 No.2

Citation
Share

Gender difference in self-leadership and its impact on the effectiveness of college life

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726;

2010, v.15 no.2, pp.215-233

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2010.15.2.003

& (2010). Gender difference in self-leadership and its impact on the effectiveness of college life. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 15(2), 215-233, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2010.15.2.003

copy

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to (1) examine gender differences in self-leadership and (2) investigate the relationship between self leadership and the various criteria of college life effectiveness such as basic occupational competencies, college life satisfaction, grade, and leadership. The Korean version of the RSLQ(Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire) composed of 9 strategies as well as measures of college life effectiveness were administered to samples of 890 college students in Seoul, Kyungido, and Choongchungdo. The results of latent means of analysis indicated that there was no gender differences on the general level of self-leadership. However, female students showed higher level of self-leadership than male students on self-reward, self-punishment, self-cluing, and constructive thought pattern strategies, while the level of natural reward strategy was higher for male students than females. Self-leadership was significantly related to all of the college life effectiveness variables. In particular, self-leadership showed very high correlation(r=.53) with basic occupational competencies and college life satisfaction for female students. For males, general leadership was the criterion of college life effectiveness that showed the strongest relationship with self-leadership(r=.44). The results of multiple regression analyses demonstrated that different strategies of self-leadership were the significant predictors for college effectiveness variables for males and females. Finally, the limitations and future direction of the present study sere discussed.

keywords: self-leadership, gender difference, college life effectiveness, 셀프리더십, 남녀차이, 대학생활효과성, self-leadership, gender difference, college life effectiveness

Reference

강혜련 (1998). 리더십과 조직적응: 남녀관리자의 비교연구. 인사조직연구, 6(2), 81-123.

곽삼근 (2005). 한국평생교육의 사회철학적 과제. 서울: 집문당.

권혜진 (2007). 대학생의 대학환경풍토지각과 대학생활적응 및 학업성취도간의 관계연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

김민정 (2006). 대학생의 셀프 리더십 개발에 영향을 미치는 학습자 변인 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

김주환, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식모형으로 논문쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.

김지현 (2007). 대학 서비스 만족도가 대학생활에서의 삶의 질과 대학에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향: 대학생활 만족도와 대학생활 행복감 측정 통한 대학생 삶의 질 측정을 중심으로. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

박성민 (2002). Self-Leadership 프로그램 효과 분석: K기업 사례. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

박세희 (2000). 벤처 구성원의 셀프 리더십이 창의적 행위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국외국어대학교 석사학위논문.

박윤자 (2003). 동기, 자기감시, 자기효능감이 학업 지향성향과 영어 읽기, 쓰기 학습 성취동기에 미치는 영향. 전북대학교 석사학위논문.

10.

손은령, 손진희 (2005). 한국 대학생의 진로결정 및 준비행동-사회 인지적 진로이론을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지 상담 및 심리치료, 17(2), 399-417.

11.

신용국, 김명소, 한영석 (2009). 셀프리더십 척도(Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire) 타당화 연구: 우리나라 대학생을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 학교. 6(3). 313-340.

12.

신희선 (2005). 지식정보화사회에서 리더십능력 개발을 위한 대학생 교양교육의 사례 연구. 독서연구, 14, 287-314.

13.

정일재 (1995). 수퍼리더십. 서울: 21세기북스.

14.

조의제 (2002). 셀프리더십과 커뮤니케이션이 직무만족에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 경남대학교 경영대학원 석사학위논문.

15.

조지혜 (2007). 성취동기, 직업가치, 진로장벽이 대학생의 진로태도성숙 및 진로준비행동에 미치는 영향. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

16.

진미석, 임 언, 채창균, 유한구, 김소연, 박은미, 이현경, 정혜령, 이수영 (2009). 2009년도 대학생 직업기초능력 진단평가 체제 구축. 서울. 한국직업능력개발원.

17.

홍세희, 황매향, 이은설 (2005). 청소년용 여성진로장벽 척도의 잠재평균분석. 교육심리연구, 19(4), 1159-1177.

18.

Brass, D. J. (1985). Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal 28, 509-520.

19.

Eagly, A. H. & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style:: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 108, 233-256.

20.

Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.

21.

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex difference in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

22.

Gilles, A. E (1990). Genger influencees on interaction and task performance in triads. unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Ilinois

23.

Hong, S., Malik, M. L., & Lee, M. K. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using non-western sample. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 63, 636-654.

24.

Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691.

25.

Khan, M. A. (2000). Self-leadership: Factor influencing self-managing activities of professionals in for-profit organizations. Ph. D. diss., Graduate School of the American University.

26.

Lee, D. M. & Alvares, K. M. (1977). Effects of sex on descriptions and evaluations of supeervisory behavior in a simulated industrial setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 405-410.

27.

Lynn, R., & Martin, T. (1997). Gender difference in extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism in 37 countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 369-373.

28.

Manz, C. C. & Sims, H. P. Jr (1986). Leading self-managed groups: a conceptual analysis of a paradox. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 7, 141-165.

29.

Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-Leadership toward an expanded theory of self-influence process in organization. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585-600.

30.

Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1999). Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. 2rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

31.

Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (2004). Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. 3rd ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

32.

Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. Jr (2001). New Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA.

33.

Neck. C. P., Stewart, G. W. & Manz, C. C. (1995). Thought self-leadership as a framework for enhancing the performance of performance appraises. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(3).

34.

Petty, M. M., & Bruning, N. S. (1980). A comparison of the relationships between subordinates' perceptions of superwisory behavior and measures of subordinates' job satisfaction for male and female leaders. Academy of Management Journal 23, 717-725.

35.

Rosener, J. B. (1995). America's competitive secret: utilizing women as a management strategy. New York. Oxford University Press.

36.

Scherwitz, L., Perkins, L., Chesney, M., & Hughes, G. (1991). Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and subsets: Relationship to demographic and psychosocial characteristics in young adults in the CARDIA study. Psychomatic Medicine, 53, 36-49.

37.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Becoming a self-regulated learning: Which are the key subprocesses?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307-313.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.15 No.2

Gender difference in self-leadership and its impact on the effectiveness of college life

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology