Gender Differences on the Dark Side of Personality related to Derailment Factors and Their Effect on College Life Effectiveness: An Application of the HDS (Hogan Development Survey)
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate gender differences pertaining to the dark side of personality, which is related to derailment factors and their effect on college-life effectiveness, based on the HDS (Hogan Development Survey), which comprises 11 dysfunctional personalities. Specifically, the study was focused on (1) gender differences on the 11 HDS scales (2) gender differences on scales for characteristics, such as excitable, skeptical, cautious, and reserved (i.e., the cluster of moving away from people); these scales were consistently, positively related to the dark sides or clinical factors of PAI and negatively related to the bright side of personality (HEXACO), contextual performance, basic occupational competencies required for college students, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction, and (3) gender differences in the relationships between the HDS scales and the various criteria of college-life effectiveness. A total of 237 college students who applied to a leadership program of A university participated in the survey. The results of the mean difference analysis demonstrated that gender differences were observed on the 6 HDS scales. To be specific, female students reported a higher level of the HDS scales than male students in terms of being excitable and cautious. On the other hand, the HDS scales for leisurely, bold, mischievous, and colorful were higher for males than females. The rest of the HDS scales (skeptical, reserved, imaginative, diligent, and dutiful) showed no significant differences between males and females. Regardless of gender, excitable, skeptical, cautious, and reserved scales were shown to be positively related to dark side of personality and clinical factors of PAI as well as to be negatively related to bright side of personality, which supports the previous study results. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that different scales of HDS were the significant predictors for college life effectiveness for males and females. Suggestions for future research and practical implications were provided based on the findings.
- keywords
- 남녀차이, 이탈, 어두운 성격요인, 대학생활 효과성, Gender differences, Derailment, Dark Side of Personality, Hogan Development Survey, College Life Effectiveness, Gender differences, Derailment, Dark Side of Personality, Hogan Development Survey, College Life Effectiveness
Reference
권영주, 박영신, 김의철 (2007). 한국 대학생의 행복에 대한 연구: 정서적 지원과 자기효능감이 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 논문집, 414-415.
강민우, 윤창영, 이순묵 (2005). 지시문과 채점방식에 따른 상황판단검사의 타당도 비교.. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 18(3), 547-565.
김명소, 김혜원, 차경호 (2001). 심리적 안녕감의 구성개념분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 19-39.
김범준, 이은진, 김영윤 (2009). 대학생의 정신병질에 대한 반사회성과 정서적 공감의 영향: 성차를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 14(2), 219-239.
김영환, 김지혜, 홍상황, 박은영 (2001). PAI의 임상적 해석. 학지사.
김용희 (2007). 공감능력과 관련된 성격특성 및 성차. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(3), 573-585.
신현균, 장재윤 (2003). 대학 4학년생의 성격특성과 성별에 따른 취업 스트레스 및 정신건강. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(4), 815- 827.
유태용, 이기범, Ashton, M. C. (2004). 한국판 HEXACO 성격검사의 구성타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(3), 61- 75.
장휘숙 (2001). 애착과 다섯가지(Big Five) 성격특성들의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 14(2), 105-119.
조명한, 차경호 (1998). 삶의 질에 대한 국가간 비교. 아산재단 연구총서 제 48집. 서울: 집문당.
조인철, 김명소 (2010). 이탈과 관련된 역기능적 성격요인의 구성타당화 및 대학생활 효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구: HDS(Hogan Development Survey)를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(3), 575-603.
진미석, 옥준필, 채창균, 최동선, 유한구, 이 성, 이수영 (2007). 대학생 직업기초능력 선정 및 문항개발연구. 한국직업능력개발원.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Benson, M. J. (2006). New explorations in the field of leadership research: A walk on the dark side of personality & implications for leadership effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Benson. M. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2007). To be, or not to be, linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 232-249.
Bentz, V. J. (1967). The Sears experience in the investigation, description, and prediction of executive behavior. In F. R. Wickert & D. E. McFarland (Eds.), Measuring Executive Effectiveness (pp.147-206). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Bentz, V. J. (1985a, August). A view from the top: A thirty-year perspective on research devoted to discovery, description, and prediction of executive behavior. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
Bentz, V. J. (1985b). Research findings from personality assessment of executives. In J. H. Bernardin & D. A. Bownas (Eds.), Personality Assessment in Organizations (pp. 82-144). New York: Praeger.
Bentz, V. J. (1990). Contextual issues in predicting high-level leadership performance. In K. E. Clark & M. B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of Leadership (pp.131-144). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions: Part IV: Social/personality issues (2nd ed., pp. 325-414). New York: Guilford Press.
Browne, K. (1998). Divided labours. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Perspectives on personality (Fourth Edition). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55–107.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
Decoster J. (2006). Applied linear regression note set 1. Retrieved from http://www.stat-help.com /notes.html
Diener, E., Emmons, R. S., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
Dotlich, D. L., & Cairo, P. C. (2003). Why CEOs fail. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Eichinger, R. W., & Lombardo, M. M. (2003). Knowledge summary series: 360-degree assessment. Human Resources Planning, 26, 34-44.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual difference: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. W. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp.141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581-592.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan Development Survey manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view of the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40-51.
Judge, T, A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A.(2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediation role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237-249.
Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In J. Langan-Fox, C.Cooper, & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp.332-355). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855-875
Kaiser, R. B., & Hogan, R. (2007). The dark side of discretion: Leader personality and organizational decline. In R. Hooijberg, J. Hunt, J. Antonakis, & K. Boal (Eds.), Being there even when you are not: Leading through strategy, systems and structures. Monographs in leadership and management (Vol. 4, pp.177-197). London: Elsevier Science.
Kring, A. M., & Gordon, A. H. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703.
Le, H., Oh, I.-S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2010). Too much of a good thing? The curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research.
Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lombardo, M. M., & McCauley, C. D. (1988). The dynamics of management derailment (Tech. Rep. No. 34). Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Lombardo, M. M., Ruderman, M. N., & McCauley, C. D. (1988). Explanations of success and derailment in upper-level management positions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 199-216.
Lynn, R., & Martin, T. (1997). Gender differences in extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism in 37 countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 369–373.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
McCall, M, W., & Hollenbeck, G, P. (2002). Developing global executives: The lessons of international experiences. Harvard Business School Cambridge.
McCall, M. W. Jr., & Lombardo, M. M. (1983). Off the track: Why and how successful executives get derailed. Technical Report No. 21. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp.105-125). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547-561.
Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356-362.
Paulhus. D. L., & Williams. K. M., (2002). The dark traid of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563
Rimm D. S. (2003). See Jane win for girls: A smart girls' guide to success. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
Rolland, J. P. and De Fruyt, F. (2003). The validity of FFM personality dimensions and maladaptive traits to predict negative affects at work: A 6 months prospective study in a military sample. European Journal of Personality, 17, 101-121.
Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549-559.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
Schmitt. D. P., Realo. A., Voracek. M., & Allik. J. (2008). Why Can’t a Man Be More Like a Woman? Sex Differences in Big Five Personality Traits Across 55 Cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168-182
Schmit, M. J., Kilm, J. A., & Robie, C. A. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53, 153-193.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
Staw, B, M., Bell, N, E., & Clausan J, A.(1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 56-77.
Van Velsor, E., & Leslie, J. B. (1995). Why executives derail: Perspectives across time and cultures. Academy of Management Review, 9, 62-72.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations