Gender Difference in Creative Thinking Ability, Creative Disposition, Creative Product and Creative Self-efficacy of the Korean College Students

김혜숙

doi:10.18205/kpa.2011.16.4.010

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.16 No.4

Citation
Share

Gender Difference in Creative Thinking Ability, Creative Disposition, Creative Product and Creative Self-efficacy of the Korean College Students

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726;

2011, v.16 no.4, pp.595-611

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2011.16.4.010

(2011). Gender Difference in Creative Thinking Ability, Creative Disposition, Creative Product and Creative Self-efficacy of the Korean College Students. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 16(4), 595-611, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2011.16.4.010

copy

Abstract

This paper examines gender differences in creative thinking ability and creative disposition, creative products and creative self-efficacy. 234 subjects of college students performs target creative tests associated with the different types of creativity and analyzes the differences between the groups. Based on the analysis, the female group shows higher score than the male group in the aspect of flexibility that is a sub-dimension of creativity and cognitive abilities, but the male group has higher scores in the creativity affective characteristic and the creative self-efficacy. On the activity and knowledge test of the creative domain, the female group has higher scores in the area of the art but the male group shows higher scores in the area of the invention. Interestingly, the two groups do not show any significant difference in the real creative achievement related to the creative product assessments. Although the female group tends to score no less capacity than the male group in the divergent thinking ability and the actual product/performance related to the creative ability, in summary, the analysis indicates that the male group is significantly higher for creative disposition and creativity self-reported tests. The study performs a stepwise multiple linear regression on the creative efficacy to investigate the gender difference on the self-efficacy of creative performance and creative achievement for the students in South Korea. The result of multiple regression analyses demonstrates three common variables to predict creative self-efficacy: creative thinking style, interesting/observation, creative activities related to art. The analysis shows the gender differences, in that in addition to those three variables the male group considers the creative personality in but the female group considers the creative activities related to science and the creative product. In other words, the female group judges the creative ability on the basis of more elements and considers the actual result of the experience and knowledge rather than its personality characteristics. To develop creative talents and creativity, it is required to promote a variety of programs and educational efforts for both male and female students. In particular, it is necessary to extend the access opportunity of the science-related activities and experiences for enhancing the self-efficacy of female students.

keywords: Creative Thinking Ability, Creative Disposition, self-efficacy, Gender Difference, 창의적 사고력, 창의적 성향, 창의적 자기효능감, 남녀차이

Reference

금재호 (2011). 기업의 여성인적자원관리 실태조사, 한국노동연구원

김아영 (2010). 학업동기: 이론, 연구와 적용. 서울, 학지사

김왕동 (2011). 창의적 융합 인재양성을 위한 과제: 과학기술과 예술융합(STEAM), STEPI Insight, 과학기술정책연구원.

김왕동, 성지은 (2009). 창의적 인재육성의 근본적 한계와 당면과제, STEPI Insight, 과학기술정책연구원.

김혜숙 (1999). 창의성 진단 측정도구의 개발 및 타당화, 교육심리연구, 13(4), 269-303.

김혜숙 (2009). 대학생의 창의적 문제해결과제 수행에 영향을 미치는 성향, 과제관련지식, 창의적 자기효능감 및 지각된 환경변인의 효과, 교육심리연구, 23(1), 15-34.

이숙정 (2011). 대학생의 학습몰입과 자기효능감이 대학생활 적응과 학업성취에 미치는 영향, 교육심리연구, 25(2), 235-254.

한영석, 김명소 (2010). 셀프리더십의 성별차이 및 대학생활 효과성에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지: 여성, 15(2), 215-233.

홍영란 (2008). 국가인재육성정책의 개념과 발전방향, 창의적 인재정책의 방향과 과제, 2008한국교육평론, 한국교육개발원.

10.

Amabile, T. M. (1982). Personality processes and aindiviual Difference. Social psychology of Creativity: A Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Personality and Social psychology. 43(5), 997-1013.

11.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social psychology. 45, 357-376.

12.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy; The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

13.

Bear, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 25-31.

14.

Bear, J. (1998). Gender differecnes in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(2), 18-37.

15.

Bear, J. & Kaufman, J. (2008). Gender Differences in Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105.

16.

Christiaans, H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion, Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), 41-54.

17.

Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The Mediating role of psychological processes, Creativity Research Journal, 16, 2 & 3, 187-199.

18.

Conti, R., Collins, M., & Picariello, M. (2001). The impact of competition on intrinsic motivation and creativity: Considering gender, gender segregation, and gender-role identity. Personality and Individual differences, 31, 1273-1289.

19.

Deci, E., Cascio, W.F., & Krusell, J. (1975). Cognitive evaluation theory of some comments on the calder and Staw critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 81-85.

20.

Davis, G. A. (1977). How Do You Think? Form E. copyright, University of Wisconsin.

21.

Feldman, D. H. (1989). Creativity: Dreams, insights, and transformations. The nature of creativity. Cambridge University Press, 271-297.

22.

Finke, R. A. (1995). Creative Insight and Preinventive Forms. The nature of insight, (Ed). Sternberg and Davidson, A Bradford Book The MIT Press. 255-280.

23.

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and pplications. Cambridge: MIT Press.

24.

Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985). Cerebral liberalization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428-459.

25.

Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social psychology. 37(8), 1398-1405.

26.

Gough, H. G. & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The Adjective Checklist manual. Plao Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc..

27.

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A.(1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.

28.

Helson, R. (1990). Creativity in women: Outer and inner views over time. In Runco, M. A.. Albert, R. S., Theories of creativity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

29.

Hocevar, D. & Bachelor, P. (1989). A Taxonomy and Critique of Measurements Used in the Study of Creativity. Handbook of creativity. Plenum Press: New York and London, 53-76.

30.

Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 383-390.

31.

Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1989). Attributional focus of praise and children's intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 61-72.

32.

Kogan(1974). Creativity and sex differences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 8, 1-14.

33.

Pollick M. F. & Kumar, V. K. (1997). Creativity Styles of Supervising Managers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(4), 260-271.

34.

Ruth, J. E., & Birren, J. E. (1985). Creativity in adulthood and old age: Relations to intelligence, sex and mode of testing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8, 99-109.

35.

Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the Crowd. Cultivating Creativity in a culture of conformity. The Free Press.

36.

Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, July.

37.

Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms and Technical Manual. Bensenville, Illinois: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc..

38.

Vernon, P. E. (1989). The nature-nurture problem in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, E C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 93-110). New York: Plenum Press.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.16 No.4

Gender Difference in Creative Thinking Ability, Creative Disposition, Creative Product and Creative Self-efficacy of the Korean College Students

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology