Factors to Affect Battered Women's Decisions Going Back to the Abused Relationship: Focused on the Learned Helplessness, Social Support, and the Risk of Domestic Violence

홍정현; 권현정; 윤성인; 이수정

doi:10.18205/kpa.2017.22.1.001

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.22 No.1

Citation
Share

Factors to Affect Battered Women's Decisions Going Back to the Abused Relationship: Focused on the Learned Helplessness, Social Support, and the Risk of Domestic Violence

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726;

2017, v.22 no.1, pp.1-22

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2017.22.1.001

& (2017). Factors to Affect Battered Women's Decisions Going Back to the Abused Relationship: Focused on the Learned Helplessness, Social Support, and the Risk of Domestic Violence. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 22(1), 1-22, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2017.22.1.001

copy

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore factors to affect the battered women's decision going back to the abused relationship. There must be more factors, but three factors were examined in this study, such as learned helplessness, social support, and violence risk. The respondents were 65 female battered women who visited shelters to avoid domestic violence. The results of this study were as follows. First, it was found that the more the learned helplessness was, the greater the risk of domestic violence became. Also, the more severe the domestic violence was, the less likely the battered women could escape from the abused relationship. However, the effect by social support was not so significant. In conclusion, this study attempted to confirm the relations among learned helplessness, social support, domestic violence level and a decision to terminate the abused relationship. This study can help to understand why battered women who experience severe domestic violence might stay home in spite of danger of their lives.

keywords: 가정폭력, 가정복귀, 학습된 무기력, 사회적지지, 가정폭력위험성평가도구(SARA), domestic violence, stay in abused relationship, learned helplessness, 　social support, 　the Spousal Assault Risk Appraisal Guide（SARA）

Reference

가정폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 (1997). 법률 제5436호.

김운회. (2003). 가정폭력범죄에 대한 경찰대응의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 전북대학교 대학원, 1.

김익기, 심영희, 박선미, & 김혜선. (1991). 가정폭력의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구-서울시의 남편의 아내폭력 현황을 중심으로. 연구총서, 1991(5), 1-217.

김재엽. (1998). 한국 가정폭력 실태와 사회계층 변인과의 관계 연구. 한국사회복지학, 35, 133-155.

류경숙 (2004). 가정폭력 피해자의 심리적 특성에 관한 연구 : 구타 당하는 아내 를 중심으로. pp. 56-58.

박미은. (1998). 매맞는 아내들의 학습된 무기력에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.

박애경 (2005). 가정폭력의 실태와 극복방안에 관한 연구-아내에 대한 폭력 중심으로. 명지대학교 사회복지대학원 석사학위논문.

박지원. (1985). 사회적 지지척도 개발을 위한 일 연구. 연세대학교 박사학위논문, 20-35, 110-115.

박종관 (2015). 재범예측에 관한 연구 : 교정시설 재복역자를 중심으로. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

10.

신기명. (1990). 학습된 무력감 진단척도의 개발에 관한 연구. 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

11.

신기명. (1992). 학습무기력. 서울: 배영사.

12.

신경수 (2007). 가정폭력의 실태와 대응방안에 관한 연구 : 남편에 의한 아내 학대를 중심으로. 경남대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

13.

신은주 (1995). 아내학대에 대한 페미니스트 접근에 관한 사회사업적 분석, 서울대학교 박사학위논문.

14.

심혜숙, 손연주. (1997). 구타당하는 여성들의 심리적 특성 연구. 여성학연구, 7(1), 65-89.

15.

이상규 (2001). 가정폭력피해여성의 스트레스에 관한 연구. 대구대학교 사회복지개발대학원 석사학위논문.

16.

이수정, 이혜선, 이수경, 김현정. (2008). 아내학대 위험성 평가도구 개발연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(1), 79-98.

17.

이영숙 (1986). 한국 도시가족 부부간의 지위관계와 부인학대에 관한 연구. pp. 46-56.

18.

여성가족부 (2004). 한국가정폭력실태조사.

19.

여성가족부 (2013). 2013년 가정폭력실태조사.

20.

채규만 (1999). 피해자를 위한 심리치료적 접근방법. 가정폭력 상담을 위한 워 크샾. 한국 여성상담센터.

21.

한국형사정책연구원 (1992). “가정폭력의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구”, 한국형사정책연구원.

22.

한국여성의전화, “전화상담조사통계”, 1983.

23.

한국여성의 전화 엮음(1995), 「여성상담과 여성복지」, pp. 151-73.

24.

한국여성의전화 (2015). 2015년도 9월 총 상담 통계.

25.

한국여성개발원 (1993). 「가정폭력의 예방 및 대책에 관한 연구」 pp. 43-75

26.

Aneshensel, C. S., & Stone, J. D. (1982). Stress and depression: A test of the buffering model of social support. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39(12), 1392-1396.

27.

Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49.

28.

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310-317.

29.

Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H. M. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13(2), 99-125..

30.

Dweck, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 109-128.

31.

Finn, J. (1985). The stresses and coping behavior of battered women. Social Casework.

32.

Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence. Simon & Schuster.

33.

Gelles, R. J. (1976). Abused wives: Why do they stay. Journal of Marriage and the Family.

34.

House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support.

35.

Hoff, L. A. (1990). Battered Women as Survivors, London : Routledge.

36.

Hoff, L. A. (2016). Battered women as survivors. Routledge.

37.

Kessler, R. C., Price, R. H., & Wortman, C. B. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36(1), 531-572.

38.

Martin, D. (1976). Battered Wives. New York: Pocket Book.

39.

Martin, G. (1987). Counseling for family violence and abuse (Vol. 6). W Publishing Group.

40.

McAuslan, P. (1992). The discovery and disclosure of wife abuse, and battered women's perceptions of support. University of Guelph.

41.

Overmier, J. B., & Seligman, M. E. (1967). Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63(1), 28.

42.

Rosenbaum, A., & O'leary, K. D. (1981). Marital violence: Characteristics of abusive couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(1), 63-88.

43.

Snyder, D. K., & Fruchtman, L. A. (1981). Differential patterns of wife abuse: A data-based typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(6), 878-899.

44.

Stark, E., & Flitcraft, A. (1988). Violence among intimates. In Handbook of family violence (pp. 293-317). Springer US.

45.

Strube, M. J., & Barbour, L. S. (1983). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Economic dependence and psychological commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 785-793.

46.

Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1985). Is family violence increasing? A comparison of the 1975 and 1985 National Survey Rates. American Society of Criminology, San Diego, California.

47.

Seligman, M. E. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

48.

Silver, R. L., & Wortman, C. B. (1980). Coping with undesirable life events. Human helplessness: Theory and applications, 279-375.

49.

Walker, L. E.(1984). The battered woman syndrome study. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, &M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families (pp. 31–48 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

50.

Walker, L. E. (2016). The battered woman syndrome. Springer publishing company.

51.

Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper &Row.

52.

Warren, J., & Lanning, W. (1992). Sex role beliefs, control, and social isolation of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 7(1), 1-8.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.22 No.1

Factors to Affect Battered Women's Decisions Going Back to the Abused Relationship: Focused on the Learned Helplessness, Social Support, and the Risk of Domestic Violence

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology