Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.29)
- 2023 (Vol.28)
- 2022 (Vol.27)
- 2021 (Vol.26)
- 2020 (Vol.25)
- 2019 (Vol.24)
- 2018 (Vol.23)
- 2017 (Vol.22)
- 2016 (Vol.21)
- 2015 (Vol.20)
- 2014 (Vol.19)
- 2013 (Vol.18)
- 2012 (Vol.17)
- 2011 (Vol.16)
- 2010 (Vol.15)
- 2009 (Vol.14)
- 2008 (Vol.13)
- 2007 (Vol.12)
- 2006 (Vol.11)
- 2005 (Vol.10)
- 2004 (Vol.9)
- 2003 (Vol.8)
- 2002 (Vol.7)
- 2001 (Vol.6)
- 2000 (Vol.5)
- 1999 (Vol.4)
- 1998 (Vol.3)
- 1997 (Vol.2)
- 1996 (Vol.1)
Robberies against Female and Male Victims
Abstract
Female victimization is one of the areas in crime research that demands more attention. Despite the relatively high rates of robbery against female victims, very few studies have compared robberies perpetrated against female and male victims, and female victims of robbery have been under-researched. By adopting a comparative approach, we aim to investigate the differences in the characteristics of female and male victimization and contribute to developing better strategies for crime prevention and victim treatment. Based on 615 robbery cases against female victims and 720 robbery cases against male victims in South Korea, we performed detailed analyses of robbery victimization. We found notable differences between robberies against females and males in terms of offender’s age, criminal history, and occupation; victim’s age; victim-offender relationship; and offense location. Moreover, robbery victimization differed by the gender of the victim with respect to offense type, premeditation, violence use, and evidence left. Furthermore, we identified a number of factors that contributed to differentiating female victimization from male victimization. The present study has practical implications for preventing robbery and developing gender-specific treatment strategies for female victims.
- keywords
- 강도, 성차, 여성 피해자, 남성 피해자, 여성 대상 범죄, robbery, gender difference, female victims, male victims, crime against women
Reference
Bachman, R., Dillaway, H., & Lachs, M. S. (1998). Violence against the elderly A comparative analysis of robbery and assault across age and gender groups. Research on Aging, 20(2), 183-198.
Baumer, E., Horney, J., Felson, R., & Lauritsen, J. L. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage and the nature of violence. Criminology, 41(1), 39-72.
Bouhours, B., & Broadhurst, R. (2015). Violence against women in Hong Kong: Results of the International Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 21(11), 1311-1329.
Cohen, L. E., Cantor, D., & Kluegel, J. R. (1981). Robbery victimization in the U. S.: An analysis of a nonrandom event. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 644-657.
Cook, P. J. (1987). Robbery violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78(2), 357-376.
Felson, R. B., Baumer, E. P., & Messner, S. F. (2000). Acquaintance robbery. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 37, 284-305.
Gale, J., & Coupe, T. (2005). The behavioral, emotional and psychological effects of street robbery on victim. International Review of Victimology, 12, l-22.
Groff, E. R. (2007). Simulation for theory testing and experimentation: An example using routine activity theory and street robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(2), 75-103.
Hale, C. (1996). Fear of crime: A review of the literature. International Review of Victimology, 4, 79-150.
Kaysen, D., Morris, M. K., Rizvi, S. L., & Resick, P. A. (2005). Peritraumatic responses and their relationship to perceptions of threat in female crime victims. Violence Against Women, 11(12), 1515-1535.
Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L. (2000). Disparity based on sex: Is gender-specific treatment warranted? Justice Quarterly, 17(1), 89-128.
Kim, J. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2015). The study on the relation of the places that robberies were occurred and robbery methods. The Korean Association of Police Science Review, 17, 71-96.
Koss, M. P., Figueredo, A. J., & Prince, R. J. (2002). Cognitive mediation of rape’s mental, physical and social health impact: Tests of four models in cross-sectional data. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 70, 926-941.
Kruttschnitt, C., McLaughlin, B., Petrie, C. (2004). Advancing the federal research agenda on violence against women. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lauritsen J. L., & Heimer, K. (2008). The Gender Gap in Violent Victimization, 1973-2004. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 125-147.
McCluskey, J. D. (2013). A comparison of robbers'use of physical coercion in commercial and street robberies. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 419-442.
Norris, F. H. (1992). Epidemiology of trauma:Frequency and impact of different potentially traumatic events on different groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 409-418.
Ozer, E. J., Best, S. R., Lipsey, T. L., &Weiss, D. S. (2003). Predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 52-73.
Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (1992). Designing and conducting survey research. San Francisco:Jossey-Boss.
Smith, M. D. (1987). Changes in the victimization of women: Is there a “new female victim”? Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 24, 291-301.
Snyder, H. N. (1999). The overrepresentation of juvenile crime proportions in robbery clearance statistics. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(2), 151-161.
Supreme Prosecutor’s Office (2015). 2014 Analytic reports on crimes. Seoul: Supreme Prosecutor’s Office.
Tillyer, M. S., & Tillyer R. (2015). Maybe I Should Do This Alone: A comparison of solo and co-offending robbery outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 32, 1064-1088.
Ullman, S. E., & Filipas, H. H. (2001). Predictors of PTSD symptom severity and social reactions in sexual assault victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 369-389.
U.S. Department of Justice (2011). Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2008 -Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Zimring, F. E., & Zuehl, J. (1986). Victim injury and death in urban robbery: A Chicago study. Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1), 1-40.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations