바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation on New Product Performance of Korean Exporting SMEs: The Moderating Role of Technological Uncertainty

The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation on New Product Performance of Korean Exporting SMEs: The Moderating Role of Technological Uncertainty

동아시아경상학회지 / East Asian Journal of Business Economics, (E)2288-2766
2022, v.10 no.3, pp.17-26
https://doi.org/10.20498/eajbe.2022.10.3.17
이영우 (충남대학교)
조영삼 (경상국립대학교)

Abstract

Purpose – In this paper, we aim to analyze to what extent entrepreneurial orientation (EO) can help overcome Korean SMEs’ liabilities of foreignness in overseas markets. In this end, we examined three sub-dimensions of EO (proactiveness, innovativeness, risk-taking) and examine their individual effects on NPD performance of exporting SMEs. Research design, data, and methodology – We collected survey questionnaires from Korean exporting SMEs that are certified with Inno-biz by the Korean Ministry of SMEs and Startups. The collected data was analyzed using SPSS 26 and AMOS to create an integrated model. Result – As a result of the analysis, we found that proactiveness and innovativeness dimension of EO have positive effect on new product performance of exporting SMEs. Furthermore, technological uncertainty has negative moderating effect between innovativeness and new product performance of SMEs. Conclusion – While proactive attitude and innovativeness of EO positively affected the performance of new products of SMEs, the tendency to take risks and pursue opportunities with bold behaviors did not have a positive effect on NPD performance in foreign nations.

keywords
Entrepreneurial Orientation, New Product Development, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

참고문헌

1.

Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12(Jan-Feb), 54-74.

2.

Brouthers, K. D., Nakos, G., & Dimitratos, P. (2015). SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances.15 Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1161-1187.

3.

Cho, H. (2021). Market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and new product performance: The moderating role of external coordination, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 32(11), 2071-2091.

4.

Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms, Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 1197-218.

5.

Cooper, R. G. (1983). The new product process: An empirically-based classification scheme, R&D Management, 13(1), 1-13.

6.

Cooper, R. G. (1979). The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure, Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 93- 103.

7.

Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments, Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.

8.

Dean, T. J., & Meyer, G. D. (1996). Industry environments and new venture formations in US manufacturing: A conceptual and empirical analysis of demand determinants. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(2), 107-132.

9.

Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

10.

Hong, J. H., Choi, I. H., Park, C. H. (2010). Market orientation, entrepreneurship orientation and new product performance in SMEs, Asia Pacific Journal of Small Business, 32(1), 107-131.

11.

Jeong, I., Pae, J. H., & Zhou, D. S. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: The case of Chinese manufacturers, Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 348–358.

12.

Keh, H. T., Foo, M. D., & Lim, B. C. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive process of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 125-148.

13.

Kim, B. (2020). The determinants of e-Trade Utilization and its impact on exporter performance in Korean SMEs. East Asian Journal of Business Economics, 8(1), 41-55.

14.

Kim, E. (2019). The effect of market orientation on speed-to-market in international markets. East Asian Journal of Business Economics, 7(1), 39-49.

15.

Kim, J. (2018). The review on the theory of internationalization of multinational firms and SMEs. East Asian Journal of Business Economics, 6(2), 49-57.

16.

Kim, J. (2021). The effect of SMEs’ slack resource on internationalization: Focusing on SMEs’ subcontracting relationship. East Asian Journal of Business Economics, 9(1), 17-26.

17.

Knight, G. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12-32.

18.

Knight, G. A. (2001), Entrepreneurship and strategy in the international SME, Journal of International Management, 7(2), 255-273.

19.

Kuivalainen, O., Sundqvist, S., & Servais, P. (2007). Firms’ degree of born-globalness, international entrepreneurial orientation and export performance. Journal of world business, 42(3), 253-267.

20.

Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. (2001). Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study of technology bases ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 615-640.

21.

Li, Y., Yi. L., & Zhao, Y. (2006). The role of market and entrepreneurship orientation and internal control in the new product development activities of Chinese Firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 336-347.

22.

Li, C. R., Chu, C. P., & Lin, C. J. (2010). The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1186–1197.

23.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135-172.

24.

Morris, M. H., & Paul, G. W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 247-259.

25.

Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791.

26.

Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic management journal, 3(1), 1-25.

27.

Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and metaanalysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 397-417.

28.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

29.

Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 635-657.

30.

Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71-91.

31.

Yoon, J. H., & Seo, M. K. (2015). An empirical study on the roles of entrepreneurial orientation, technology orientation, and market orientation in the rapid internationalization: Based on international new ventures, Journal of Business Research, 30(1), 231-255.

32.

Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientation on technology and market-based breakthrough innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42-60.

동아시아경상학회지