open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0718
Understanding of symbolic function of replica objects was examined with 24- and 30-month-old children. In Experiment 1, understanding of objects was compared with understanding of words, photographs, and gestures. 24- and 30-month-old children understand objects as well as words, photographs, and gestures. However, they understand objects worse than words and photographs. Understandings of photographs, gestures, and objects were related to each other significantly, especially at 30 month. In Experiment 1a, understanding of objects was compared again with understanding of words, pictures, and gestures in a sample of children from similar socio-economic and educational backgrounds. Unlike in Experiment 1, 30-month-old children understand all symbols whereas 24-month-old children understand only words and gestures. 24-month-old children understand objects worse than words and gestures whereas 30-month-old children understand objects worse than other symbols. Understanding of gestures and objects showed significant positive correlations at both 24- and 30-months. In addition, understanding of words and pictures showed a significant positive correlation at 30-month. These results from experiment 1 and 1a showed that DeLoache's dual representation hypothesis can explain early understanding of symbolic function of replica objects. In Experiment 3, the effect of iconicity of replica objects was examined. 24- and 30-month-old children understand objects better when an object and a referent are physically similar to each other than when they are not.
Callaghan, T.C. (1999). Early understanding and production of graphic symbols. Child Development, 70, 1314-1324.
Callaghan, T.C. (2000). Factors affecting children's graphic symbol use in the third year : Language, similarity, and iconicity. Cognitive Development, 15, 185-214.
Callaghan, T.C., & Rankin, M.P. (2002). Emergence of graphic symbol functioning and the question of domain specificity. Child Development, 73, 359-376.
DeLoache, J.S., (1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of young children. Science, 238, 1556-1557.
DeLoache, J.S. (1989). Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cognitive Development, 4, 121-139.
DeLoache, J.S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of picture and models. Child Development, 62, 736-752.
DeLoache, J.S. (2000). Dual representation and young children's use of scale models. Child Development, 71, 329-338.
DeLoache, J.S. (2002a). Early development of the understanding and use of symbolic artifacts. In U. Goswami(Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
DeLoache, J.S. (2002b). The symbol-mindedness of young children. In W. Hartup., & R. Weinberg (Eds.), The Minnesota symposium on child psychology, Vol.32. Manwah, NJ.: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
DeLoache, J.S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trend in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 66-70.
DeLoache, J.S., & Burns, N.M. (1993). Symbolic development in young children: Understanding models and pictures. In C. Pratt., & A.F. Garton (Eds.), Systems of representation in children: Development and use. Baffins Lane, Chichester : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DeLoache, J.S., & Burns, N.M. (1994). Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition, 52, 83-110.
DeLoache, J.S., de Mendoza, O.A.P., & Anderson, K.N.(1999). Multiple factors in early symbol use: The effect of instructions, similarity, and age. Cognitive Development, 14, 299-312.
DeLoache, J.S., Kolstad, V., & Anderson, K.N. (1991). Physical similarity and young children's understanding of scale models. Child Development, 62, 111-126.
DeLoache, J.S., Miller, K.F., & Rosengren, K. S. (1997). The credible shrinking room: Very young children's performance with symbolic and nonsymbolic relations. Psychological Science, 8, 308-313.
DeLoache, J.S., Pierroutsakos, S.L., & Uttal, D.H. (2003). The origins of pictorial competence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 114-118.
DeLoache, J.S., Pierroutsakos, S.L., & Uttal, D.H. , Rosengren, K.S., & Gottlieb, A. (1998). Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychological Science, 9, 205-210.
Dow, G. A., & Pick, H.L. (1992). Young children's use of models and photograph as spatial representation. Cognitive Development, 7, 351-363.
Harris, P.L., Kavanaugh, R.D., & Dowson, L. (1997). The depiction of imaginary transformation: Early comprehension of a symbolic function. Cognitive Development, 12, 1-19.
Johnson, K.E., Younger, B.A., & Cuellar, E.A. (2005). Toddlers' understanding of iconic models: Cross-task comparison of selection and looking responses. Infancy, 8, 189-200.
Marzolf, D.P., & DeLoache, J.S. (1994). Transfer in young children's understanding of spatial representation. Child Development, 64, 1-15.
Namy, L.L., Campbell, A.L., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 37-57.
Peirce, C.S. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peralta de Mendoza, O.A., & Salsa, A.M. (2003). Instruction in early competence and use of a symbol-referent relation. Cognitive Development, 18, 269-284.
Pierroutsakos, S. L., & DeLoache, J.S. (2003). Infant's manual exploration of pictorial objects varying in realism. Infancy, 4, 141-156.
Pierroutsakos, S. L., & Troseth, G.L. (2003). Video Verite: Infants' manual investigation of objects on video. Infant Behavior and Development, 26, 183-199.
Preissler, M.A., & Carey, S. (2004). Do both picture and words function as symbols for 18 and 24-month-old children? Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 185-212.
Striano, T., Rochat, P., & Legerstee, M. (2003). The role of modeling and request type on symbolic comprehension of objects and gestures in young children. Journal of Child Language, 30, 27-45.
Striano, T., Tomasello, M., & Rochat, P. (2001). Social and object support for early symbolic play. Developmental Science, 4, 442-455.
Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. Dunham(Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Gluckman, A. (1997). Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Development, 68, 991-1222.
Tomasello, M., Striano, T., & Rochat, P. (1999). Do young children use objects as symbols? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 563-584.
Younger, B.A., & Johnson, K.E. (2004). Infant's comprehension of toy replicas as symbols for real objects. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 207-242.
Younger, B.A., & Johnson, K.E. (2006). Infants' developing appreciation of similarities between model objects and their real-world referents. Child Development, 77, 1680-1697.