바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

만 14개월 한국 영아들의 합리적 모방 능력

Development of rational imitation in 14-month-old Korean infants

초록

본 연구는 한국 14개월 영아들이 타인의 행동을 모방할 때, 행동이 이루어지는 상황적인 제약을 고려하여 합리적인 모방을 할 수 있는지, 그리고 합리적 모방 수행의 개인 차이가 어떤 기질적 요소로 설명될 수 있는지를 알아보았다. 본 연구는 Gergely, Bekkering과 Király(2002)의 머리로 등 켜는 과제를 사용하여 한국 영아들의 합리적인 모방 수행을 측정하였다. 영아들은 시연자가 손을 사용할 수 있는 상황(손 가용 조건) 혹은 손을 사용할 수 없는 상황(손 불가용 조건)에서 머리로 등을 켜는 새로운 행동을 본 후에 시연자의 행동을 모방할 기회를 가졌다. 손 가용 조건의 영아들은 손 불가용 조건의 영아들보다 머리로 등을 켜는 재연 반응을 더 많이 보였다. 이러한 결과는 한국 14개월 영아들도 타인의 상황적 제약을 고려하여 행동 목표를 추론할 수 있음을 보여준다. 손 가용 조건에서 머리 반응이 실험 상황에서 얼마나 많이 나타나는가는 기질의 부정적 정서와 부적 상관이 있었으며, 얼마나 빨리 나타나는가는 기질의 주의 지속성 요소와 정적 상관이 있었다. 이는 합리적 모방 수행의 개인차가 부정적 정서와 주의 지속성 기질로 설명될 수 있음을 제안한다.

keywords
합리적 모방, 의도 이해, 기질, 목적론적 추론, rational imitation, intention understanding, temperament, teleological reasoning, rational imitation, intention understanding, temperament, teleological reasoning

Abstract

The current study investigated the development of rational imitation in 14-month-old Korean infants using Gergely et al. (2002)’s procedure. We also examined the relationship between infants’ rational imitation and their temperament. The infants watched an actor use her head to illuminate a light box while her hands were free (Hands-free condition) or while her hands were occupied by a blanket (Hands-occupied condition). The infants in the hands-free condition were more likely to imitate the actor’s head action than the infants in the hands-occupied condition. In the hands-free condition, the frequency of head reenactment negatively correlated with infants’ negative emotionality and the latency of head reenactments negatively correlated with the duration of orienting in infants. These results indicate that 14-month-old Korean infants can infer the goals of others’ actions by considering situational constraints and that individual differences in rational imitation can be related to differences in infants’ temperament.

keywords
투고일Submission Date
2011-04-15
수정일Revised Date
2011-05-15
게재확정일Accepted Date
2011-05-16

참고문헌

1.

위영희 (1994). 영·유아 기질측정 척도(IBQ)의 타당화에 관한 일 연구. 아동학회지. 15(1) 109-125.

2.

정윤경, 곽금주, 성현란, 심희옥, 장유경 (2005). 영아의 타인의 주의적 관계에 대한 이해와 협응적 공동 주의와의 관계: 선별적 응시 모방과제를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 18(3), 165-180.

3.

Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- to 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315-330.

4.

Csibra, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Gergely, G. (2003). One-year old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27, 111–133.

5.

Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (1998). The teleological origins of mentalistic action explanations: A developmental hypothesis. Developmental Science, 1, 255-259.

6.

Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). ‘Obsessed with goals’: Functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychologica, 124, 60-78.

7.

Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró , S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237–267.

8.

Dixon, J. W. E., Salley, B. J., & Clements, A. D. (2006). Temperament, distraction, and learning in toddlerhood. Infant Behavior and Development, 29(3), 342-357.

9.

Ferrari, P., Paukner, A., Ruggiero, A., Darcey, L., Unbehagen, S., & Suomi, S. J. (2009). Interindividual differences in neonatal imitation and the development of action chains in rhesus macaques. Child Development, 80, 1057-1068.

10.

Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kiraly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.

11.

Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (1997). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The infant’s naive theory of rational action. A reply to Premack and Premack. Cognition, 63, 227-233.

12.

Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning about actions: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287-292.

13.

Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Bı´ro´, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193.

14.

Heimann, M., Nelson, K, E., & Schaller, J. (1989). Neonatal imitation of tongue protrusion and mouth opening: Methodological aspects and evidence of early individual differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 30, 90-101.

15.

Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K., & Harris, P. (2011). Children’s selective trust in native accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14(1), 106-111.

16.

Kujawski, J. H. & Bower, T. G. R. (1993). Same-sex preferential looking during infancy as a function of abstract representation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 201-209.

17.

Meltzoff, A. N. (1988). Infant Imitation After a 1-Week Delay: Long-Term Memory for Novel Acts and Multiple Stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 470-476.

18.

Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 838-850.

19.

Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates. Science, 198, 75-78.

20.

Morales, M., Mundy, P., Delgado, C. E. F., Yale, M., Neal, R., & Schwartz, H. K. (2000). Gaze following, temperament, and language development in 6-month-olds: A replication and extension. Infant Behavior and Development, 23(2), 231-236.

21.

Oostenbroek, J., Virginia P. Slaughter, Nielsen, M., & Suddendorf, T. (2011, April). Newborn imitation and temperament. In M. Gattis (Chair), Individual differences in early imitation. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Canada.

22.

Rothbart, M. K. (1981). Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Development, 52, 569–578.

23.

Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 99–166). New York: Wiley.

24.

Sakkalou, E., Ellis-Davies, K., Fowler, E., Hilbrink, E., & Gattis, M. (2011, April). The king Louie effect on a noncausal task: Faithful imitation of simple actions and sounds is related to social traits. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Canada.

25.

Salley, B., & Dixon, W. (2007). Temperament and joint attention predictors of language development. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 53, 131-154.

26.

Schwier, C., van Maanen, C., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Rational Imitation in 12-Month-Old Infants. Infancy, 10(3), 303-311.

27.

Southgate, V. & Csibra, G. (2009). Inferring the outcome of an ongoing novel action at 13 months. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1794-1798.

28.

Todd, J. T., & Dixon Jr, W. E. (2010). Temperament moderates responsiveness to joint attention in 11-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 33(3), 297-308.

29.

Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

30.

Zmyj, N., Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M. J., & Daum, M. M. (2010). The reliability of a model influences 14-month-olds’ imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(4), 208-220.

31.

Zmyj, N., Daum, M. M., & Aschersleben, G. (2009). The development of rational imitation in 9- and 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 14(1), 131-141.

logo