바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Good Student but not a Good Friend: Domain-Specific Self-Control in Middle School Students

Abstract

A year-long longitudinal study explored how self-control varies by domain in middle-school students. The current study confirms that self-control can be separated into schoolwork and interpersonal self-control domains and that each domain predicts theoretically relevant academic and social outcomes. At the beginning of the school year, teachers rated their students on behaviors that exemplified self-control in schoolwork and interpersonal contexts. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor domain-specific self-control model. Self-control in schoolwork predicted more active class engagement, which in turn increased academic achievement at the end of the school year. Interpersonal self-control predicted less anger, which thereby reduced peer conflict at the end of the school year. Collectively, the current findings empirically support the domain specificity of self-control and reveal its impact on affective, motivational, social, and academic outcomes. Implications for future self-control intervention studies are discussed.

keywords
Submission Date
2016-07-01
Revised Date
2016-08-20
Accepted Date
2016-08-30

Reference

1.

설경옥, 경예나, 지영진 (2015). 중학생의 성별, 수줍음, 자기조절의 상호작용이 또래 괴롭힘 피해에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28(4), 33-54.

2.

장혜인 (2010). 자기조절적 기질로서의 통제노력: 연구 현황과 과제. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 23(3), 117-138.

3.

장혜인, 박형인 (2015). 아동의 자기조절과 심리사회적 정응: 국내 연구의 메타분석적개관. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28(1), 1-32.

4.

Ayduk, O., Mendoza-Denton, R., Mischel, W., Downey, G., Peake, P. K., & Rodriguez, M. (2000). Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 776-792.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.776

5.

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

6.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

7.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252

8.

Berry, W. D., & Feldman, S. (1989). Multiple regression in practice. Sage series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

9.

Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C. T., Andersen, B. L., & Glaser, R. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 403-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.403

10.

Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65(2), 493-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624. 1994.tb00765.x

11.

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 22, (pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Converse, P. D., Piccone, K. A., & Tocci, M. C. (2014). Childhood self-control, adolescent behavior, and career success. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 65-70. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.007

13.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16

14.

de Ridder, D. T., de Boer, B. J., Lugtig, P., Bakker, A. B., & van Hooft, E. A. (2011). Not doing bad things is not equivalent to doing the right thing: Distinguishing between inhibitory and initiatory self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1006-1011. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.015

15.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y

16.

Duckworth, A. L. (2011). The significance of self-control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2639-2640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019725108

17.

Duckworth, A. L., Tsukayma, E., & Patrick, S. D. (April, 2014). A tripartite taxonomy of character. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association. Philadelphia, PA.

18.

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x

19.

Duckworth, A. L., & Steinberg, L. (2015). Unpacking self-control. Child Development Perspectives, 9(1), 32-37. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12107

20.

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Murphy, B. C., Guthrie, I. K., Jones, S., ..., & Maszk, P. (1997). Contemporaneous and longitudinal prediction of children's social functioning from regulation and emotionality. Child Development, 68(4), 642-664. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb04227.x

21.

Eisenberg, N., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. (1997). The development of empathic accuracy. In W. Jekes (Ed.), Empathic Accuracy (pp.73-116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

22.

Elias, M. J., & Haynes, N. M. (2008). Social competence, social support, and academic achievement in minority, low-income, urban elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 474-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.4.474

23.

Fleeson, W. (2007). Studying personality processes:Explaining change in between-persons longitudinal and within-person multilevel models. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 523-542). New York, NY: Guilford Press

24.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). Class engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059

25.

Galla, B. M., Plummer, B. D., White, R., Meketon, D., D'Mello, S. K., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). The Academic Diligence Task (ADT): Assessing individual differences in effort on tedious but important schoolwork. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 314-325. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.001

26.

Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

27.

Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multiple discriminant analysis. Multivariate data analysis, 178-256.

28.

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny:Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360

29.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY:Guilford Press.

30.

Jarvinen, D. W., & Nicholls, J. G. (1996). Adolescents' social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 435-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.435

31.

Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25(2), 334-339. doi: 10.1177/0956797613502676

32.

Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333-351. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1

33.

Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood:continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 220-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.220

34.

Laursen, B. (1995). Conflict and social interaction in adolescent relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(1), 55-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0501_3

35.

Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009). Age differences in personality: evidence from a nationally representative Australian sample. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1353-1363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013914

36.

Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness:Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70 (3), 175-191. doi: 10.2307/2673207

37.

Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2007). A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 869-874. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.022

38.

Mischel, W. (1969). Continuity and change in personality. American Psychologist, 24(11), 1012-1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037

39.

Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1-22. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902. 130709

40.

Mischel, W., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Shoda, Y. (2002). Situation-behavior profiles as a locus of consistency in personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(2), 50-54. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00166

41.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive affective system theory of personality:reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246

42.

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Peake, P. K. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 687-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.687

43.

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244(4907), 933-938. doi: 10.1126/science.2658056

44.

Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., ..., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693-2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108

45.

Murphy, B. C., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Young children's emotionality, regulation and social functioning and their responses when they are targets of a peer's anger. Social Development, 6(1), 18-36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997. tb00092.x

46.

Muthen, L. K., & Muthén, L. (1998). Mplus [computer software]. Los Angeles, CA:Muthén & Muthén.

47.

Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100(5) 443-471. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1002279

48.

Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 978-986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978

49.

Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22

50.

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.

51.

Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp.159-186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

52.

Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506. 2004.00263.x

53.

Tsukayama, E., Duckworth, A. L., & Kim, B. (2012). Resisting everything except temptation:Evidence and an explanation for domain specificity impulsivity. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 318-334. doi: 10.1002/per.841

54.

Tsukayama, E., Duckworth, A. L., & Kim, B. (2013). Domain-specific impulsivity in school-age children. Developmental Science, 16(6), 879-893. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.120

logo