바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴
search

ISSN : 1229-0718

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.2

Latent Profiles of Life-goals among Korean High School Students: Developmental Factors and Adjustment in University

Eunseok Kim (Department of psychology, Daegu university)
Keng-hie Song (Department of psychology, Ewha womans university)
The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology / The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, (P)1229-0718; (E)2671-6542
2019, v.32 no.2, pp.103-125
https://doi.org/10.35574/KJDP.2019.06.32.2.103
Kim, E., & Song, K. (2019). Latent Profiles of Life-goals among Korean High School Students: Developmental Factors and Adjustment in University. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 103-125, https://doi.org/10.35574/KJDP.2019.06.32.2.103

Abstract

This study aimed to classify life goals among South Korean 12th graders. Moreover, the roles of gender and developmental factors (parent-child relationships, a sense of community, and learning goal orientation) that contribute to life goal profiles were studied. Finally, adjustment at university according to life goal profiles was investigated. The Korean Educational Longitudinal Study data was analyzed, using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA). There were 2,828 participants (males: 1,275) who completed the second, third, sixth, and seventh surveys. The results indicated that the life goals of the 12th graders were classified into three types: pursuing life goals, intermediate, and low development. In addition, when students reported a high level of respect for parents, responsibility to participate in society, cooperative learning, the mastery approach, and performance avoidance, they were more likely to fall into the intermediate life goals profiles than the low development profiles. Moreover, a high level of achievement pressure, respect for parents, and concern for others contributed to increasing possibilities that students belong to the pursuing life goals profiles. In addition, compared to boys, girls tended to be more likely to be affiliated with pursuing life goals profiles than intermediate life goals profiles. Finally, pursuing a high level of diverse life goals in the 12th grade increased adjustment success at university. Theoretical and practical implications and limitations of the study are also discussed.

keywords
Submission Date
2019-04-15
Revised Date
2019-05-19
Accepted Date
2019-05-30

Reference

1.

강명숙, 방은령 (2014). 대학생의 자기주도성, 학습몰입, 진로결정효능감과 진로탐색행동 간의 관계 구조분석. 한국심리학회지:문화 및 사회문제, 20(4), 443-467.

2.

고성희, 임성택 (2010). 한국형 부모-자녀관계와 청소년의 학교생활 적응의 관계. 교육과학연구, 41(1), 45-64.

3.

고영남 (2017). 청소년의 생애목표와 삶의 만족의 관계: 의미추구와 의미발견의 매개효과. 한국교육학연구, 23(4), 161-182.

4.

공계순, 서인혜 (2016). 고등학생의 생애목표관련 요인 및 생애목표의 영향에 관한 연구. 복지상담연구, 5(2), 1-26.

5.

김민성, 조윤정 (2017). 일반계 고등학생의 학업성취목표와 생애목표와의 종단적 관계:자기결정성의 매개효과. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(14), 393-420.

6.

김선숙, 안재진 (2012). 청소년 자원봉사활동이공동체 의식에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감과 또래애착의 매개역할을 중심으로. 사회복지연구, 43(1), 339-363.

7.

김성수 (2014). 부모의 자율성 지지, 생애목표및 성취목표 간의 구조적 관계. 아시아교육연구, 15(3), 29-52.

8.

김연신, 최한나 (2009). Schwartz의 보편적 가치이론의 적용 타당성 연구: 한국대학생을대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(1), 1-16.

9.

김우리, 김정섭 (2016). 대학생이 지각한 부모의 자율성 지지가 심리적 안녕감에 미치는 영향: 생애목표의 매개효과. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(5), 671-690.

10.

김정실, 박영신 (2018). 청소년의 학업성취와효도. 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 155-155.

11.

김태한 (2017). 학교 및 지역사회에서의 사회적 관계가 청소년의 확장된 공동체에 대한 이타적 목표의식에 미치는 효과. 교육사회학 연구, 27(1), 31-53.

12.

박영신, 김의철, 한기예 (2003). 아동과 청소년의 부모에 대한 지각 - 토착심리학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 9(2), 127-164.

13.

박은정, 이유리, 이성훈 (2016). 남녀 고등학생의 생애목표 유형에 따른 자기조절학습과학업성취의 차이. 교육종합연구, 14(3), 1-27.

14.

박은희, 최은실 (2015). 성인애착과 대학생활적응의 관계에서 자아존중감과 대인관계능력의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28 (1), 57-79.

15.

손민정, 조인수, 최정은 (2018). 생애진로분기점별 진로정체성 혼돈에 따른 진로전략분석. 한국산학기술학회 논문지, 19(6), 299-323.

16.

신종호, 서은진, 이유경 (2011). 생애목표검사개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 25(2), 255- 276.

17.

신종호, 진성조 (2013). 생애목표유형이 학업적자기개념, 학업노력, 시험불안에 미치는영향: 성취수준에 따른 차이 검증. 교육심리연구, 27(1), 161-180.

18.

유순화 (2018). 여대생의 생애목표와 진로적응성 간의 관계. 여성학연구, 28(2), 283-310.

19.

윤선아 (2016). 청소년의 생애목표와 부모 양육태도, 정서문제 및 학교생활 적응과의관계. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(1). 909-932.

20.

이용진, 양현정, 조성희 (2017). 학사경고생의특성 변인과 교육적 개입 필요성에 대한탐색. 교육방법연구, 29(1), 161-184.

21.

이현주, 채유정 (2014). 청소년 체험활동 참여, 사회․정서, 생애목표의 수준 및 구조적관계에서의 성차. 한국청소년연구, 25(2), 173-207.

22.

인효연, 길혜지 (2017). 청소년들의 삶의 목표유형에 따른 진로 정체감, 공동체 의식및 삶의 만족도 차이. 미래청소년학회지, 14(1), 25-49.

23.

장휘숙 (2008). 인생과정 조망과 성인기 발달. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 21(3), 99-113.

24.

전보라, 정혜영, 윤소정 (2016). 전문대학생의생애목표와 성취목표가 학업지연행동에미치는 영향. 교육문화연구, 22(6), 313-334.

25.

정영숙, 김수빈 (2014). 대학신입생의 자기 존중감, 자기자비와 대처전략 및 대학생활적응의 관계, 한국심리학회지: 발달, 27(4), 117-138.

26.

정유지, 이은주 (2016). 대학생의 자기결정 동기유형과 생애목표의 잠재프로파일에 따른 진로성숙도, 대학생활적응, 및 학업성취도의 차이. 교육과학연구, 47(4), 187-208.

27.

정유지, 이은주 (2018). 청소년기 생애목표 프로파일의 종단적 변화 및 예측요인 검증. 교육심리연구, 32(1), 79-98.

28.

정은이 (2016). 대학생의 자기 주도성과 대학적응의 관계에서 다양성 수용도 및 진로역량의 매개효과. 교육방법연구, 28(4), 651-679.

29.

최용성 (2003). 도덕교육에 있어서 정의와 배려의 공동체에 관한 연구. 도덕윤리와교육, 42, 163-193.

30.

한국교육개발원 (2010). 한국교육종단연구 2005(Ⅵ). 서울: 범신사.

31.

한호종 (2015). 부모의 양육태도가 자녀의 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향과 생애목표의매개효과. 우석대학교 석사학위논문.

32.

Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structure, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.

33.

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329-341.

34.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2001). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Cervantes, J. M., & Arczynski, A. V. (2015). Children’s spirituality: Conceptual understanding of developmental transformation. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 2(4), 245-255.

36.

Chang, E. S., Chen, C., Greenberger, E., Dooley, D., & Heckhausen, J. (2006). What do they want in life?: The life goals of a multi-ethnic, multi-generational sample of high school seniors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 302-313.

37.

Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 171-200.

38.

Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.

39.

Emmons, R. A. (2005). Striving for the sacred:Personal goals, life meaning, and religion. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 731-745.

40.

Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Satisfaction of needs and determining life goals: A model of subjective well-being for adolescents in high school. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 1757-1764.

41.

Groep, S., Zanolie, K., & Crone, E. A. (2019). Giving to friends, classmates, and strangers in adolescence. Journal of Reasearch on Adolescence, 1-8. doi: 10.1111/jora.12491

42.

Heckhausen, J. (1997). Developmental regulation across adulthood: Primary and secondary control of age-related challenges. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 176-187.

43.

Ilardi, B. C., Leone, D., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(21), 1789-1805.

44.

Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280-287.

45.

Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In P. Schmuck & K. M. Sheldon (Eds), Life Goals and Well-being:Towards a Positive Psychology of Human Striving (pp. 116-131). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

46.

Keeton, K., Fenner, D. E., Johnson, T. R., & Hayward, R. A. (2007). Predictors of physician career satisfaction, work-life balance, and burnout. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(4), 949-955.

47.

Lee, J. Q., McInerney, D. M., Liem, G. A. D., & Ortiga, Y. P. (2010). The relationship between future goals and achievement goal orientations: An intrinsic–extrinsic motivation perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 264-279.

48.

Lűdrke, O., Trautwein, U., & Husemann, N. (2009). Goal and personality trait development in a transitional period: Assessing change and stability in personality development. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 428-441.

49.

McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.

50.

Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514-523.

51.

Milyavskaya, M., & Werner, K. (2018). Goal pursuit: Current state of affairs and directions for future research. Canadian Psychology, 59(2), 163-175.

52.

Noddings, N. (2002). 배려교육론 (추병완, 박병춘, 황인표 역). 서울: 다른우리. (원서출판1992).

53.

Nurmi, J. (2004). Socialization and self development: Channeling, Selection, adjustment, and reflection. In R. Learner &L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. New York: Wiley.

54.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

55.

Rijaveć, M., Brdar, I., & Miljković, D. (2011). Aspirations and well-being: Extrinsic vs. intrinsic life goals. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 20(3), 693-710.

56.

Rueter, M. A., & Conger, R. D. (1995). Interaction style, problem-solving behavior, and family problem-solving effectiveness. Child Development, 66(1), 98-115.

57.

Selman, R. L. (1980). The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding: Developmental and Clinical Analyses. New York: Academic Press.

58.

Skinner, E., Johnson, S., & Snyder, T. (2005). Six dimensions of parenting: A motivational model. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5(2), 175-235.

59.

Steinberg, L. (2017). Adolescence (11th ed., pp.247). New York: McGraw-Hill.

60.

Vansteenkiste, M. Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., Matos, L., & Lacante, M. (2004). Less is sometimes more: Goal contents matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 755-764.

61.

Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18(4), 450-469.

logo

e-Submission
OA Policy
KOREAN