ISSN : 1229-0718
Youth become increasingly concerned with their social status during early adolescence, and their social status is predictive of their academic and social functioning. The current study examined the longitudinal associations between two forms of social status(perceived popularity and social preference) and academic-social behavioral profiles, and the role of academic norms in behavioral development among early adolescents. Participants(N=736, 52% girls at W1, N=677, 52% girls at W2) evaluated the academic norms of their peers, and nominated peers for various academic and social behaviors as well as social status. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the two-factor structure of the behavioral profile: aggressive-disruptive and prosocial-engaged. Controlling for behavioral stability from W1 to W2, structural equation modeling indicated that the aggressive-disruptive behavioral profile at W1 positively predicted perceived popularity at W2. In addition, perceived popularity at W2 was positively associated with both aggressive-disruptive and prosocial-engaged behavioral profiles at W2, whereas social preference was negatively associated with the aggressive-disruptive behavioral profile but positively associated with the prosocial-engaged behavioral profile. Furthermore, youths’ academic norms at W2 were associated with an increased prosocial-engaged behavioral profile at W2. The current study underscores the importance of social status and peer norms in explaining adolescents’ behavioral development.
김동현, 이규미 (2010). 초등학생의 또래지위와공격성과의 관계: 선호도, 인기도를 중심으로. 초등교육연구, 23(2), 175-194.
김은아, 이승연 (2011). 남녀 중학생의 또래괴롭힘 방어행동과 공감, 자기효능감, 학급규준에 대한 믿음의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 24(1), 59-77.
김진구, 박종효 (2015). 초등학생의 공격성이사회적 지위에 미치는 영향: 또래 공동체의식과 교사 친밀성의 조절효과. 열린교육연구, 23(4), 207-231.
김진구, 신희영 (2018) 초기 청소년기 또래거부의 사회화 과정: 초기 네트워크와 교사-학생 관계의 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 31(3), 163-182.
박종효, 김진구, 윤영 (2017). 초등학생의 지각된 인기가 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향-또래 연결망 구조의 조절효과. 아시아교육연구, 18(1), 25-49.
신희영 (2018c). 종단적 사회연결망 분석을 통해 살펴본 청소년의 관계 지배적 목표가공격 행동의 또래 상호 작용에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 15(3), 307-329.
심재량, 박종효 (2018). 초등학생의 또래거부와괴롭힘 피해 행동의 관련성-학급 갈등규범의 조절효과. 교육심리연구, 32(3), 549-569.
이승연 (2014). 중학생의 공감, 사회적 자기효능감, 지각된 규준과 또래괴롭힘 방어행동과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 27(3), 89-109.
이승연 (2011). 초등학생의 공격성과 사회적선호도, 지각된 인기도의 관계: 친사회적행동과 사회적 유능성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 8(2), 153-173.
홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지:임상, 19(1), 161-177.
Babcock, B., Marks, P. E., Crick, N. R., & Cillessen, A. H. (2014). Limited nomination reliability using single and multiple item measures. Social Development, 23(3), 518-536.
Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children's classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 1-13
Cairns, R. B., Leung, M. C., Gest, S. D., & Cairns, B. D. (1995). A brief method for assessing social development: Structure, reliability, stability, and developmental validity of the interpersonal competence scale. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 33(6), 725-736.
Cillessen,A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development in context: Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82-99). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: Aggressive peer norms and friendship dynamics modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 935-959.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102-105.
de Bruyn, E. H., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journalof Adolescent Research, 21(6), 607-627.
Dijkstra, J. K., Berger, C., & Lindenberg, S. (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents' friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive Behavior,37(5), 417-429.
Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 992-1004.
Garandeau,C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1699-1710.
Glifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235-284.
Gremmen, M. C., Berger, C., Ryan, A. M., Steglich, C. E. G., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2019). Adolescents’ friendships, academic achievement, and risk behaviors:Same-behavior and cross-behavior selection and influence processes. Child Development, 90(2), 192-211.
Faris, R. and Felmlee, D. (2011) Status Struggles Network Centrality and Gender Segregation in Same- and Cross- Gender Aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48-73.
Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5). 247-256.
Hair, J. F.,Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E. D., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall: London.
Hamm, J., V., Farmer, T. W., Lambert, K., & Gravelle, M. (2014). Enhancing peer cultures of academic effort and achievement in early adolescence: Promotive effects of the SEALS intervention. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 216-228.
Hamm, J. V., Schmid, L., Farmer, T. W., & Locke, B. (2011). Injunctive and descriptive peer group norms and the academic adjustment of rural early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 41-73.
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 279-309.
Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., Van Acker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59-81.
Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 127-155.
Issacs, J., Voeten, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Gender-specific or common classroom norms? Examining the contextual moderators of the risk for victimization. Review of Social Development, 22(3), 555-579.
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders’behaviors moderate the effects of risk factorson victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(3), 261-282.
Ladd, G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 333-359.
LaFontana, K, M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635-647.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., Ryan, A. M., Harakeh, Z., Shin, H., & Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2018). The moderating role of popular peers’goals in 5th and 6th graders’ achievement-related friendships: A social network analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 289-307.
Lease, A, M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11(1), 87-109.
McCoy, S. S., Dimler, L. M., Samuels, D. V., & Natsuaki, M. N. (2019). Adolescent susceptibility to deviant peer pressure: Does gender maatter? Adolescent Research Review, 4(1), 59-71.
McElhaney, K. B., Antonishak, J., & Allen, J. P. (2008). “They like me, they like menot”:Popularity and adolescents’ perceptions of acceptance predicting social functioning over time. Child Development, 79(3), 720-731.
McEvoy, A., & Welker, R. (2000). Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(3), 130-140.
Mercer, S. H., McMillen, J. S., & DeRosier, M. E. (2009). Predicting change in children’s aggression and victimization using classroom-level descriptive norms of aggression and pro-social behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 47(4), 267-289.
Merten, D. E. (1996). Visibility and vulnerability:Responses to rejection by nonaggressive junior high school boys. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(1), 5-26.
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course- persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674-701.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125-144.
Peets, K., Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salimivalli, C. (2015). Classroom norms of bullying alter the degree to which children defend in response to their affective empathy and power. Developmental Psychology, 51(7), 913-920.
Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83(6), 1917-1931.
Rambaran, J. A., Hopmeyer, A., Schwartz, D., Steglich, C., Badaly, D., & Veenstra, R. (2017). Academic functioning and peer influences: A short-term longitudinal study of network-behavior dynamics in middle adolescence. Child Development, 88(2), 523-543.
Rodkin, P. C.,Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popularboys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14-24.
Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. V. (2006). They’re cool:Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15(2), 175-204.
Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. APA: Educational Psychology Handbook: Vol.2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors, K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan. (Editors in Chief), 363-389.
Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139-1150.
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., &Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378-387
Rubin,K. H., Bukowski, W., &Parker, J. G. (2006). Peers interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. Lerner (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 571-645). New York, NY: Wiley.
Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics and teachers. In W. B. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.). Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships and Groups, 2nd Edition. (pp. 637-656). New York, NY:Guilford Press.
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258.
Salmivalli,C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystander matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668-676.
Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1126-1127.
Sentse, M., Scholte, R., Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2007). Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal child Psychology, 35(6), 1009-1019.
Shin, H. (2018a). The role of friends in help-seeking tendencies during early adolescence: Do classroom goal structures moderate selection and influence of friends? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 135-145.
Shin, H. (2017a). Friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression, pro-social behavior, and social status: the moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2305-2320.
Shin, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2017). Friend influence on early adolescent disruptive behavior in the classroom: Teacher emotional support matters. Developmental Psychology, 53(1), 114-125.
Stormshak, E. A., Bierman, K. L., Bruschi, C., Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Development, 70(1), 169-182.
Thomas, D. E., Bierman, K. L., Powers, C. J., &the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2011). The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive-disruptive behavior. Child Development, 82(3), 751-757.
Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Wanner, B. (2005). Patterns of affiliation with delinquent friends during late childhood and early adolescence:Correlates and consequences. Social Development, 14(1), 82-108.
Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. Elliot &C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279-296). New York, NY: Guilford Press.