바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Infants’ social evaluations of helping behaviors

Abstract

The current study examined whether 12- to 17-month-olds are sensitive to the positivity of helping behaviors in their social evaluations. In a violation-of-expectation (VOE) task, they were first familiarized with helping and neutral events. In the helping event, an agent helped a circle, whereas the circle had no interaction with another agent in the neutral event. The test phase consisted of four trials in which the circle approached either the helper or the neutral agent. In a choice task, the infants were asked to choose either the helper or the neutral agent. In the VOE task, the infants looked reliably longer at the neutral agent-approach than at the helper-approach event in the second pair of test trials, suggesting that they expected the circle to approach the helper. However, such a difference in looking times in the two test events was not observed in the first pair of test trials. In the choice task, they preferred the helper over the neutral agent. The current findings demonstrate that 12- to 17-month-olds distinguish helpers from neutral agents when they infer others’ preferences as well as when they generate their own preferences.

keywords
Submission Date
2019-04-12
Revised Date
2019-05-19
Accepted Date
2019-05-30

Reference

1.

Buon, M., Jacob, P., Margules, S., Brunet, I., Dutat, M., Cabrol, D., & Dupoux, E. (2014). Friend or foe? Early social evaluation of human interactions. PloS one, 9(2), e88612.

2.

Carstensen, L. L., & DeLiema, M. (2018). The positivity effect: A negativity bias in youth fades with age. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 7-12.

3.

Chae, J. J. K., & Song, H. J. (2018). Negativity bias in infants’ expectations about agents’dispositions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 620-633.

4.

Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo‐Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, 3, 1-47.

5.

Fawcett, C., & Liszkowski, U. (2012). Infants anticipate others’ social preferences. Infant and Child Development, 21(3), 239-249.

6.

Hamlin, J. K. (2015). The case for social evaluation in preverbal infants: Gazing toward one’s goal drives infants’ preferences for helpers over hinderers in the hill paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1563, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01563

7.

Hamlin, J. K., & Baron, A. S. (2014). Agency attribution in infancy: Evidence for a negativity bias. PloS one, 9(5), e96112.

8.

Hamlin, J. K., & Van de Vondervoort, J. W. (2018). Infants’ and young children’s preferences for prosocial over antisocial others. Human Development, 61(4-5), 214-231.

9.

Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26(1), 30-39.

10.

Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559.

11.

Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2010). Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13(6), 923-929.

12.

Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14(5), 402-408.

13.

Lee, Y. E., Yun, J. E. E., Kim, E. Y., & Song, H. J. (2015). The development of infants’sensitivity to behavioral intentions when inferring others’ social preferences. PloS one, 10(9), e0135588.

14.

Margoni, F., & Surian, L. (2018). Infants’evaluation of prosocial and antisocial agents:A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1445-1455.

15.

Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (1997). Infants attribute value±to the goal-directed actions of self-propelled objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 848-856.

16.

Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296-320.

17.

Salvadori, E., Blazsekova, T., Volein, A., Karap, Z., Tatone, D., Mascaro, O., & Csibra, G. (2015). Probing the strength of infants’ preference for helpers over hinderers: Two replication attempts of Hamlin and Wynn (2011). PloS one, 10(11), e0140570.

18.

Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children selectively avoid helping people with harmful intentions. Child Development, 81(6), 1661-1669.

19.

Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal:The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 383-403.

20.

Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Hamlin, J. K. (2016). Evidence for intuitive morality:Preverbal infants make sociomoral evaluations. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 143-148.

21.

Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Hamlin, J. K. (2018). The early emergence of sociomoral evaluation: Infants prefer prosocial others. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 77-81.

22.

Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311(5765), 1301-1303.

23.

Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy, 11(3), 271-294.

24.

Wood, S., & Kisley, M. A. (2006). The negativity bias is eliminated in older adults: Age-related reduction in event-related brain potentials associated with evaluative categorization. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 815-820.

logo