A Narrativitized and Discursive Maum of Socialized Beauty and Body in Korea

김기범; 김양하; 차영란

doi:10.18205/kpa.2007.12.3.008

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.12 No.3

Citation
Share

A Narrativitized and Discursive Maum of Socialized Beauty and Body in Korea

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083

2007, v.12 no.3, pp.377-393

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2007.12.3.008

& (2007). A Narrativitized and Discursive Maum of Socialized Beauty and Body in Korea. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 12(3), 377-393, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2007.12.3.008

copy

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the psychological process of internalization of social value about plastic surgery by the analysis of social discourse and personal narrative through FGI and interview. A total of 10 university students was participated at FGI and 46 students was interviewed. The results indicated that there was the social representation of plastic surgery in the Maum of students. In case of having plastic surgery, they reported that even though there was social stereotype of plastic surgery, they'd like to have that by means of psycho-social function of that. For example, they were conscious of social approval and benefit for job opportunity in terms of plasitc surgery. It was implied that plastic syndrome was the product of social interaction. University students, especially female students, were more likely to pursue the socialized beauty and body in comparison with male students.

keywords: 성형, 담론, 내러티브, 사회적 표상, 사회화최근 한국 사회는 ‘성형열풍 ‘끝없는 욕망’ 무조건 젊게, 예쁘게...개성 죽이는 사회’(경향신문, 2007년 2월 21일자), ‘성형공화국’, ‘성형을 권하는 사회’, ‘지역과 소득을 넘어 성형이 일반화된 것’ 등으로 묘사되고 있고 진단되고 있다. 자세한 내용을 보면, ‘더 젊고 예뻐지려는 욕망은 자연스러운 일이다...성형 열풍의 뿌리는 전사회적인 외모지상주의 현상이다...몸의 상품화, 자본화라는, Plastic Surgery, Discourse, Narrative, Social Representation, Socialization, Plastic Surgery, Discourse, Narrative, Social Representation, Socialization

Reference

김기범, 차영란 (2006). 여성의 화장을 통한 미(美)와 자기개념의 사회문화적 의미분석. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 11(1), 107-123.

김기범, 차영란, 김미희 (2006). 여풍담론의 심리학: 언론보도내용 분석을 중심으로. 한국여성심리학회 동계학술대회, 24-29.

김기범, 최상진 (2002). 정 마음 이야기 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 16(2), 29-50.

김양하, 김기범, 차영란 (2007). 화장의 자의식적 특성분석과 화장마음의 사회인지모형 검증. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 12(2), 83-105.

김지영, 김기범 (2005). 한국여성에게 적용되는 사회문화적 규범의 형성과 심리적 기능에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 10(2), 157-171.

경향신문, 2007년 2월 21일자, ‘성형열풍 ‘끝없는 욕망’ 무조건 젊게, 예쁘게...개성 죽이는 사회’.

손은정 (2007). 공적 자기의식, 사회문화적 가치의 내면화 및 신체상에 대한 태도가 성형의도 에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 12(1),

유창조, 정혜은 (2002). 소비자의 아름다움 추구행위에 관한 탐색적 연구: 남성의 치장과 여성의 치장, 성형 및 피트니스를 중심으로. 소비자학연구, 13(1), 211-232.

임인숙 (2002). 한국사회의 몸 프로젝트: 미용성형 산업의 팽창을 중심으로. 한국사회학, 36(3), 183-204.

10.

전경란, 이명희 (2002). 여성의 욕구, 자아존중감과 성형태도에 관한 연구. 복식, 52(6), 71-83.

11.

정태연, 김기범, Michele J. Gelfand (2005). 문화의 새로운 차원 경직성과 유연성(Tightness-Looseness). 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(3), 101-116.

12.

차영란, 김기범 (2006). 여성의 화장에 대한 태도와 성형 의도에 대한 자기존중감과 신체존중감의 역할 분석. 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 논문집, 580-581.

13.

Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1992). You look “mahvelous”: The pursuit of beauty and the marketing concept. Psychology & Marketing, 9(1), 3-15.

14.

Burr, V. (2002). The person in social psychology. Psychology Focus.

15.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.

16.

Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: Doubleday.

17.

Gabrenya, W. K., Jr. (1999). Psychological anthropology and the “levels of analysis” problem：We married the wrong cousin. In J. C. Lasry, J. Adair, & K. Dion(Eds.), Latest contributions to cross-cultural psychology(pp. 333-351). Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage.

18.

Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275.

19.

Gergen, K. J., & Thatchenkery, T. J. (1996). Developing dialogue for discerning differences. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(4), 428-433.

20.

Gergen, M. (2001). Feminist reconstructions in psychology: Narrative. gender, and performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

21.

Harre, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

22.

Harre, R., & Stearns, P. (1995). Discursive psychology in practice. London: Sage Publications.

23.

Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson, & N. S. Endler(Eds.), Personality at the crossroads：Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum.

24.

New York Times, May 22, 2007, This is your life(and how you tell it).

25.

Price, R. H., & Boufford, D. (1974). Behavioral appro priateness and situational constraint as dimension of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 579-586.

26.

Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (2003). Social psychology. NJ: Prentice Hall.

27.

Thomson, C. J., & Hirschman, E. C. (1995). Understanding the socialized body: A poststructuralist analysis of consumers' self-conceptions, body images, and self-care practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 139-153.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.12 No.3

A Narrativitized and Discursive Maum of Socialized Beauty and Body in Korea

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology