Gender Social Identity, Relative Deprivation and Collective Action of Korean Women

김금미; 한영석

doi:10.18205/kpa.2008.13.4.004

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.13 No.4

Citation
Share

Gender Social Identity, Relative Deprivation and Collective Action of Korean Women

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083

2008, v.13 no.4, pp.453-477

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.4.004

& (2008). Gender Social Identity, Relative Deprivation and Collective Action of Korean Women. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 13(4), 453-477, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.4.004

copy

Abstract

This study assessed the ability of the theory of social identity and relative deprivation to account for the effects of group status, legitimacy, and stability of women on gender social identity, group relative deprivation and collective action. A sample of Korean women(N=637) was surveyed with questionnaire constructed to measure group status, legitimacy, and stability of women on gender social identity, relative deprivation and social identity management strategy. The Results showed the addition of relative deprivation led to the significant increments(higher level recategorization 2.8%, change of comparison dimension 6.3%, collective action 16.1%) in amount of explained variance in social identity management strategy. This result shows usability of social identity theory and group relative deprivation in male-female inter-group relationship. The significance, implications, and limitations of these findings were discussed and topics to be investigated in the future study were mentioned.

keywords: 사회정체성이론, 상대적 박탈이론, 상위범주화, 비교차원변경, 집단행동, 지위, 합법성, 안정성, 양성평등, social identity theory, relative deprivation theory, social identity management strategy, status, legitimacy, stability, gender equality

Reference

김금미․한덕웅 (2001). 여성의 성별사회정체성과 남녀간 경쟁전략의 관계, 한국심리학회지: 여성, 6(2), 15-38.

김금미․한덕웅 (2002). 남녀집단의 지위, 성별정체성 및 지위관련성이 집단간 분배에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회 연차대회 학술발표논문집, 288-293.

김금미․한덕웅․한영석 (2003). 남성의 성별관계 인식과 성별사회정체성이 양성평등 행동의도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(1). 31-47.

김금미․한영석 (2002). 여성의 합법성, 안정성 및 성별사회정체성이 양성평등신념과 행동에 미치는 영향-여대생을 중심으로-. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 7(3), 1-20.

박군석․한덕웅 (2002). 영호남인의 상대박탈에서 사회구조 요인과 사회정체성의 영향. 한국심리학회 연차대회 학술발표논문집, 401-402.

한덕웅 (1995). 집단 행동 이론의 비판적 개관(Ⅱ): 집단간 관계 이론을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 10(1), 39-84.

한덕웅 (2002). 집단 행동이론. 시그마프레스. 서울.

한덕웅 (2003). 한국사회에서 사회정체성이론에 의한 소수집단의 심리와 행동에 관한 연구의 전망. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, 397-398.

Abeles, R. P. (1976). Relative deprivation, rising expectations and black militancy. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 119-137.

10.

Bernstein, M., & Crosby, F .(1980). An empirical examination of relative deprivation theory, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 442-456.

11.

Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: a taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697-729.

12.

Cameron, R. E., & Lalonde, R. N. (2001). Social identification and gender-related ideology in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 59-77.

13.

Crosby, F., Muhrer, P., & Loewenstein, G. (1986). Relative deprivation and explanation: Models and concepts. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman & M. P. Zanna(Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 4, pp.17-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

14.

Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio- structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stoebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp.27-57). Chichester: Wiley.

15.

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617-626.

16.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. New York: Wiley.

17.

Folger, R. (1986). A referent cognition theory of relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman & M. P. Zanna(Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 4, pp.33-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

18.

Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith(Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation(pp.183-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

19.

Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1990). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. Routledge. London and New York.

20.

Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., Harnish, R., & Hodge, C. N. (1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 241-254.

21.

Lalonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 78-85.

22.

Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229-245.

23.

Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., Wenzel, M., & Kanning, U. P. (1996). Social identity of East Germans: The process of unification between East and West Germany as a challenge to cope with ‘negative social identity’. In G. Breakwell & E. Lyons(Eds), Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Change (pp.405-428). Oxford; Butterworth-Heinemann.

24.

Rey, C., & Raju, P. (1996). Group relative deprivation: Cognitive versus affective components and protest orientation among indian South Africans. Journal of Social Psychology, 136(5), 579-588.

25.

Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.

26.

Tajfel, H. (1982). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.

27.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (2nd ed., pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

28.

Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1987). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. New York: Praeger.

29.

Vanneman, R. D. & Pettigrew, T. F. (1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461-486.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.13 No.4

Gender Social Identity, Relative Deprivation and Collective Action of Korean Women

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology