바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

메뉴
search

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.14 No.1

Marital Quality according to Couple Type made pattern by Autonomy in Marriage: Mediation Effect of Conflict Management Strategy


The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083
2009, v.14 no.1, pp.133-151
https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2009.14.1.007
(2009). Marital Quality according to Couple Type made pattern by Autonomy in Marriage: Mediation Effect of Conflict Management Strategy. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 14(1), 133-151, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2009.14.1.007

Abstract

Autonomy in Marriage(AM; Chang, 2008) considers the compatibility state of 2 sub-factors(Autonomous Self, Respect for Spouse's Autonomy) as psychological autonomy in the context of marriage. This paper purposes to examine the effect of AM on marital quality and the mediation effect of conflict management strategy. Mail survey was conducted on 456 Japanese married men and women sampled by probability sampling method in ages between 35 and 75. Results indicated that (a) the participants were classified into 5 types of couple by the degree of AM with different demographic characteristics; (b) in the case of group where husband and wife had high degree of AM, the marital quality was highest; and also (c) the group with high AM used adaptive conflict management strategy. These results empirically corroborates that AM had significant positive effect on marital life. Furthermore, results suggested that the pursuit of autonomy was as important as the pursuit of connectedness in marriage and the importance of equivalent autonomy at the same time. Finally, the significance of this study, limitations were discussed.

keywords
부부관계 심리적 자립, 부부관계의 질, 갈등해결전략, Autonomy in Marriage, marital quality, conflict management strategy

Reference

1.

곽소영, 손은정 (2008). 이성 관계에서 심리적 욕구충족이 관계만족에 미치는 영향: 내재적 동기와 갈등해결 전략의 매개역할. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 13(2), 177-195.

2.

장수지 (2008). 부부관계 심리적 자립의 개념화 및 척도의 타당도 검토: 일본 중ㆍ노년기 여성을 대상으로 한 질적-양적 통합 연구, 한국가족관계학회지, 13(1), 75- 103.

3.

秋山弘子 (1997). ジェンダーと文化ー男性と女性の社会的ネットワーク. 柏木恵子, 北村忍, 東洋(編). 文化心理学: 理論と実証. 東京大学出版会.

4.

青木邦子 (1993). 高齡化社会における女性（文化的土壌と幸福感)-自立概念の整理と自立性尺度の作成-. 東京女子大学比較文化研究所紀要, 54, 79-122.

5.

東洋 (1994). 日本人にしつけと教育:発達の日米比較にもとづいて. 東京大学出版会.

6.

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago, IL: Rand McnNally.

7.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

8.

Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.

9.

Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Aronson.

10.

Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.

11.

大坊郁夫 (1987). 社会の中の家族,. 長田雅喜(編). 家族関係の社会心理学, 福村出版.

12.

Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Models of marital interaction. In H. Giles & W. P Robinson(Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology. London: Wiley.

13.

Fitzpatrick, M. A., Fey, J., Segrin, C., & Schiff, J. L. (1993). Internal working models of relationships and marital communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1, 2), 103-131.

14.

Helgeson, V. S. (1994a). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412-428.

15.

Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173-183.

16.

平山順子, 柏木恵子 (2001). 中年期夫婦のコミュニケーション態度. 発達心理学研究, 5, 72-83.

17.

久徳重盛 (1990). 新母原病. サンマーク出版.

18.

岩上真珠 (2003). ライフコースとジェンダーで読む家族. 有斐閣コンパクト.

19.

柏木恵子, 平山順子 (2003). 結婚の“現実”と夫婦関係満足度との関連性-妻はなぜ不満なのか. 心理学研究, 74(2), 122-130.

20.

藤森立男 (1989). 日常生活にみるストレスとしての対人葛藤の解決過程に関する研究. 社会心理学研究 4, 108-116.

21.

Kagan, J. W., & Moss, H. A. (1960). The stability of passive and dependent behavior from childhood through adulthood. Child Development, 31, 577-591.

22.

Kurdek, L. A (1995). Predicting change in marital satisfaction from husband's and wives' conflict resolution styles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 153-164.

23.

Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

24.

目黒依子 (1987). 個人化する家族. 勁草書房.

25.

Neff, K. D., & Harter,. S. (2002). The role of power and authenticity in relationship styles emphasizing autonomy, connectedness, or mutuality among adult couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(6), 835- 857.

26.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.

27.

Sillars, A. L. (1980). The equential and distributional structure of conflict interactions as a function of attributions concerning the locus of responsibility and stability of conflicts. In D.Nimmo(Ed.), Communication yearbook. Ⅳ. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

28.

Stinnett, N., & DeFrain, J. (1985). Secrets of storng families. Boston: Little, Brown.

29.

Watson, P. J., Sherbak, J., & Morris, R. J. (1998). Irrational beliefs, individualism-collectivism, and adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 173-179.

30.

Wesson, L. (1996). Relative income, power, perceived equity and marital satisfaction in dual-career families. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Science and Engineering, 57(1-B).

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

e-Submission
OA Policy
KOREAN