본 논문에서는 성폭력 피해아동의 진술분석 도구로 지금까지 가장 널리 알려진 CBCA와 RM을 통해 성폭력 실제 피해아동과 상상 피해아동의 진술의 신빙성을 평가하였다. 그리고, CBCA와 RM을 이용하여 두 집단의 진술의 특성을 살펴보았다. 연구대상자는 실제 피해아동 35명(남=2명, 여=33명, M=10.11, SD=1.56)과 상상 피해아동 9명(여=9명, M=13)이다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 실제 피해집단이 상상 피해집단 보다 CBCA와 RM 모두에서 더 유의하게 높은 점수를 얻었다. 둘째, 실제 피해 집단의 진술은 CBCA에서 1번(논리적 구성), 3번(세부정보의 양), 6번(대화의 재현), 8번(일상적이지 않은 세부 정보), 11번(외적으로 관련된 사실과의 연합), 12번(주관적인 경험), 14번(자발적인 수정 혹은 첨가), 15번(기억 부족 시인) 등의 총8개 준거에서 더 유의미한 점수를 획득하였다. CBCA는 총19개 준거 중 8개 준거가 진실 진술과 상상 진술을 구분하였다. 셋째, RM에서는 모든 준거가 실제 피해 집단에서 유의미하게 높은 점수를 나타냈다. 넷째, 실제 피해아동의 진술이 상상 피해 아동의 진술보다 일관되고 생생한 진술이 가능하며, 사건에 대한 세부정보가 더 풍부하고, 사건 당시 가해자의 행위에 대한 구체적인 묘사와 재현이 가능했으며, 사건 당시 분노와 혐오, 슬픔, 두려움 등 피해아동의 정서와 감정이 더 많이 수반되었으며, 시각적․청각적인 감각적 정보가 더 많이 진술에 나타났다. 연구결과를 종합하면, 실제 피해아동 진술에서 CBCA와 RM의 준거가 더 많이 발견되었고, RM에서 CBCA보다 실제 진술과 상상 진술을 구분하는 개별 준거가 더 많이 나타났다.
The purpose of this thesis is to judge the credibility and the veracity of the sexually abused children's statements through Criteria-Based Content Analysis(CBCA) and Reality Monitoring(RM). This study experimented with the imagined statements to compare with the true statements. The true statements received significantly higher total CBCA and RM scores and eight individual CBCA criteria scores and all individual RM criteria scores than the imagined statements. Compare to the imagined statements, the true statements had more vivid and detailed information, descriptions of interactions, and reproduction of conversation with offender. The true statements have more children's emotion and feelings, such as rage, hatred, sadness, and fear than the imagined. Moreover, the true statements had more perceptual information. On the other hand, the imagined statements had spatial information and temporal information to understand the sexual abuse. However the imagined statements did not have perceptual informations based on the real experience.
고은영 (2008). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술녹화영상자료에 대한 준거기반 내용분석의 타당화를 위한 연구, 성신여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
안상수, 변화순, 문미경, 장미혜, 강은영 (2009). 여성․아동 안전지표체계 구축 및 개발, 여성부.
양미정 (2008). 진술자의 신분차이 및 이해득실 정도가 현실모니터링 척도 점수에 미치는 영향, 강원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
윤여훈 (2008). 아동들의 가해․피해 진술에 대한 준거기반 내용분석의 타당성 연구, 강원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
이미선 (2004). 성폭력 피해 아동진술에 대한 준거기반 내용분석의 타당화를 위한 연구. 한림대학교 석사학위논문.
이수정 (2009). 아동성폭력피해자 조사절차 예비 연구. 한국심리학회연차발표.
이수정, 김현정 (2008). 아동 성폭행 피해 조사시 고려해야 할 요인. 아동과 청소년 인권. 대한범죄학. 105-137.
이흥철, 장윤희 (1996). 정서와 기억. 인지과학. 7(3). 61-80.
채규만 (2001). 성 피해 심리치료. 학지사.
Boychuk, T. (1991). Criteria-Based Content Analysis of children's statements about sexual abuse: a field-based validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Az.
Browne, A. (1991). The victim's experience: pathways to disclosure. Psychotherapy, 28(1), 150-156.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). The suggestibility of the child witmess: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.
Christianson, S. A. & Loftus, E. F. (1991). Remembering emotional events: The fate of detailed information. Cognition and Emotion, 5(2), 81-108.
Craig, R. A. (1995). Effects of interview behavior on children's statements of sexual abuse. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Craig, R. A., Scheibe, R., Raskin, D. C. Kircher, J. C. & Dodd, D. H. (1999). Interviewer questions and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 77-85.
Esplin, P. W., Boychuk T., & Raskin, D. C. (1988). A field validity study of criteria-based content analysis of children's statements in sexual abuse case. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute Credibility assessment in Maaratea, Italy, June 1988.
Faller, K. C. (1993). Child Sexual Abuse: Intervention and Treatment Issue. 노충래(역). 2003. 아동 성학대의 치료. 학지사.
Frieze, I. H., Hymer, S., & Greenberg, M. S. (1987). Describing the crime victim: Psychological reactions to victimization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18 (4), 299-315.
Granhag, P. A. Strömwall, L. A., & Olsson, C. (2001). Fact or fiction? Adult' ability to assess children's veracity. Paper presented at the 11th European Conference on Psychology and Law, libson, Portugal.
Haugaard, J. J. (1988). Judical determination of children's competency to testify: Should it be abandoned?. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 19(1), 102-107.
Höfer, E., Akehurst, L., & Metzger, G. (1996). Reality monitoring: A Chance for further development of the CBCA?. Paper presented at the 6th European Conference on Psychology and Law, Sienna, Italy, August 1996.
Jaffe, P., Wilson, S. K., & Sas, L. (1987). Court testimony of child sexual abuse victims: emerging issues in clinical assessments. Canadian Psychology/ Psychologic Canadienne, 28(3). 291-295.
Johnson, M. K. & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review. 88(1), 67-85.
Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 371- 376.
Kapardis, A. (2002). Psychology and Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Köhnken, G. & Wegener, H. (1982). Credibility of witness statement: Experimental examination of selected reality criteria]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 29, 92-111.
Kovera, M. B. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or Influence juror decision making? a social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 178-191.
Lamb, M. E., Sternberg K., Esplin P. W., Jershkowitz I., Orbach Y., & Hovav M. (1997). Criterion-based content analysis: A field validation study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 255-264.
Lamber-Winkelman, F., Buffing, F., & Van der Zaden, A. P. (1992). Statement validity analysis in child sexual abuse cases: A field study. Poster session Oxford, England.
Landry, K., & Brigham, J. C. (1992). The effect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 663-675.
McDaniel, M. A., Lyle, K. B., Butler, K. M., & Dornburg, C. C. (2008). Age-related deficits in reality monitoring of action memories. Psychology and Aging. 23(3), 646-656.
McNally, R. J., Clancy S. A., Barret, H. M., & Parker H. A. (2005). Reality monitoring in adults reporting repressed, recovered, or continuous memories of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 114(1), 147-152.
Morgan, P. S. & Craig A. A. (1987). When reality monitoring fails: the role of imagination in stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 653- 662.
Pezdek, K. (2004). Detecting deception in children: Event familiarity affects criterion-based content analysis ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(1), 119-126.
Ratican, K. (1992). Sexual abuse survivors: Identifying symptoms and special treatment considerations. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71, 33-71.
Rogers, M. L. & Brodie, L. (2004). Detecting deception in children: event family affects criterion-based content analysis ratings, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 120.
Ruby, C. L. & Brigham, J. C. (1997). The usefulness of the criteria-based content analysis technique in distinguishing between truthful and fabricated allegations. Psychology, Public, Policy, and Law, 3(4), 705-737.
Schuller, R. A. (1992). The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 597- 620.
Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.
Steller, M. (1988). The development of statement reality analysis. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on credibility assessment in Maratea, Italy, June 1988.
Steller, M. & Köhnken, G. (1989). criteria based content analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence. New York, NJ: Springer-Verlag.
Strömwall, L. A., Bengtsson, L., Leander, L., & Granhag, P. A.(2004). Assessing children's statements: The impact of a repeated experience on CBCA and RM ratings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 653-668.
Suengas, A. G. & Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of experimental Psychology: General. 117 (4), 377-389.
Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell(ed.), Reconstructing the past: The Role of Psychologists in Criminal Trials. Stockholm: P. A. Norsted and Sons.
Undeutsch, U. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51-67.
Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on credibility assessment in Maratea, Italy, June 1988.
Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 113-153.
Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2002). Will the thruth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skill on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 261-283.
Vrij, A. (2004). Let me inform you how to tell a convincing story: CBCA and reality monitoring scores as a function of age, coaching, and deception. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 36(2), 113-126.
Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A Qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1). 3-41.
Warren, A. R. (2002). The believability of children and their interviewers' hearsay testimony: When less is more. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(5), 846-857.
Winkel, F. W., Vrij, A., Koppelaar, L., & Van der Steen, J. (1991). Reducing secondary victimization risks and skilled police intervention: Enhancing the equality of police rape victim encounters through training programmes. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 7, 2-11.
Yuille, J. C. (1988). The systematic assessment of children's testimony. Canadian psychology/ Psychologie Canadienne, 29(3), 247-263.
Yurchesyn, K. A., Keith, A., & Renner, E. (1992). Contrasting perspectives on the nature of sexual assault provided by a service for sexual assault victims and by the law courts. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 24(1), 71-85.
