The effect of couples' similarities and agreement level on their communication and marriage satisfaction

김은지; 박재호

doi:10.18205/kpa.2010.15.3.005

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.15 No.3

Citation
Share

The effect of couples' similarities and agreement level on their communication and marriage satisfaction

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726;

2010, v.15 no.3, pp.403-423

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2010.15.3.005

& (2010). The effect of couples' similarities and agreement level on their communication and marriage satisfaction. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 15(3), 403-423, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2010.15.3.005

copy

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to execute a research in depth about the relationship between couple’s similarities, image agreement level of the self and spouse and the couple’s communication as well as general satisfaction in their marriage life. Randomly selected 231 married couples living in four different areas participated in this research. In terms of couples' similarities, the participants were divided into four groups by feature combination of Positive-Negative and Forward-Backward. And about image agreement level, the result was drawn by self perceptional difference between Current image and Wish image of the self and of their spouse. The outcomes show as follows: firstly, the couple’s communication competence is high when they share the same Forward direction. Secondly, the more similarities the couples have, the higer level of marriage satisfaction they have. As a noticeable result, even though they are different, husband's higher level of task directional tendency over the wife lead to higher satisfaction level in their marrage. Thirdly, when the gap between couples' wish images and current images is smaller, the level of their marriage satisfaction and communication competence show higher. Above results suggest clearer expection in gender role and accurate understanding of spouse’s wish image as well as couples' similarities play a critical role in quality of marriage.

keywords: 부부유사성, 자기상일치도, 배우자상일치도, 결혼만족, 커뮤니케이션, couples’ similarities, self-image agreement level, spouse image agreement level, marriage satisfaction, couple communication, couples’ similarities, self-image agreement level, spouse image agreement level, marriage satisfaction, couple communication

Reference

고재홍, 전명진 (2003). 부부의 유사성과 결혼만족도간의 관계: 프로파일 유사성 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(3), 1-16.

김미경, 고재홍 (2008). 프로파일 일치도로 본 부부간 유사성과 배우자 이해가 주관적 안녕감에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 13(2), 103-123.

김향련, 고재홍 (2007). 부부간 상호지각의 일치도와 결혼만족도간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(2), 89-105.

김혜주, 전종국 (2005). 정서역량과 부부관계에 관한 연구. 상담학연구, 6(2), 633-644.

박영화, 고재홍 (2005). 부부의 자존감, 의사소통 방식, 및 갈등대처행동과 결혼만족도간의 관계: 자기효과와 상대방 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 65-83.

박재호 (1984). 소집단 연구의 방법론: Bales의 SYMLOG 상호교섭 측정법. 영남대학교 인문연구, 5, 509-531.

박재호 (1988). 新場理論 SYMLOG: 이론적 측면과 응용적 측면. 인문연구, 10, 181-214.

석말숙 (1989). 문제행동 청소년과 일반행동 청소년 가정의 가족 역동 비교. 이화여자학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

손현주 (2004). 부인의 취업여부와 부부의정서역량이 부부상호지각에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 영남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

10.

오선주 (2002). 본인과 배우자의 성격특성이 결혼의 질에 미치는 영향: 남편과 부인의 비교 연구. 대한가정학회지, 40(10), 201- 215.

11.

이민식, 김중술 (1995). 부부관계 적응척도(Dyadic Adjustment Scake)의 표준화 예비연구. 한국심리학회 ‘95연차대회 학술발표논문집, 291-299.

12.

이선희 (2000). 부부의 MBTI 성격유형의 유사성과 의사소통 및 결혼만족도의 관계. 카톨릭대학교 석사학위논문.

13.

이정은, 이영호 (2000). 개인특성, 스트레스 및 부부간 의사소통과 결혼만족도의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(3), 531-548.

14.

장춘미 (1998). 스트레스와 결혼만족간의 관계에 대한 부부의 지지행동 및 갈등해결행동의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 14 (1), 153-171.

15.

전종국 (1987). SYMLOG형용사척도의 타당성 검증: 가족 상호작용과정을 중심으로. 영남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

16.

진명옥 (1995). 가족구성원의 상호지각과 집단역동에 관한 연구. 영남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

17.

Acitelli, L. K., Douvan, E., Veroff, J. (1993). Perception of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 10, 5-19.

18.

Bales, R. F. & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A System for the Multiple Level Observation of Groups, New York: Free Press.

19.

Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1990). International Preferences in selection mate A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross cultural Psychology, 1-25.

20.

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary Perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.

21.

Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., Elder, Jr., G. H., Lorenz, F. O., Simons, R. L., &, Whitbeck, L. B. (1992). A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 63. 526-541.

22.

Craddock, A. E. (1991). Relationships between attitudinal similarity, couple structure, and couple satisfaction, within married and defacto couples. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 11-16.

23.

Cristensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication pattern questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Califonia, Los Angeles.

24.

Dawson, D. A. (1991). Family structure and children's health and well-being: Data from the 1988 National Health Interview Study on Child Health. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 573-584.

25.

Gonzaga, G. C., Campo, B., Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 34-48.

26.

Gottman, J. M. (1993). The Roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6-15.

27.

Higgins, E. T. (1989). Self-discrepancy: A theory: What patterns of Self-beliefs cause people to suffer? In berko witz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social Psychology(vol. 22, pp. 93-136). New York: Academic Press.

28.

Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1979). Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principles. New York: Brunner/ Mazel.

29.

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2000). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.

30.

Kenny, D. A., & Acitelli, L. K. (1994). Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 417-431.

31.

Kenny, D. A., & Nasby, W. (1980). Splitting the reciprocity correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Family Psychology, 38, 249-256.

32.

Kline, M., Johnston, J. R., & Tschann, J. M. (1991). The long shadow of marital conflict: A model of children's postdivorce adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 297- 309.

33.

Margolin, G., & B. E. Wampold. (1981). Sequential Analysis of conflict and Accord in Distressed and Nondistressed Marital Partners, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554-567.

34.

Meyer, J. P., & Pepper, S. (1977). Need compatibility and marital adjustment in young married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 331-342.

35.

Sillars, A. L., Scott, M. D. (1983). Interpersonal perception between intimates: An intergrative review. Human Communication Research, 10, 153-176.

36.

Simpson, J. A., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Campbell, L. (2000). The Structure and functions of ideal standards in Close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher M. Clark(Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes(pp. 86-106). Oxford, England Blackwell.

37.

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.

38.

Thibaut, J. W. & Kelly, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

39.

Tracey, T. J., Ryan, J. M., & Jaschik-Herman, B. (2001). Complimentarity of interpersonal circumplex traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 786-797.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.15 No.3

The effect of couples' similarities and agreement level on their communication and marriage satisfaction

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology