바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology

메뉴

The relationships of between personality and marital satisfaction in married couples

Abstract

The purpose of this study was examined how the relationship between the personality and marital satisfaction. Level of personality maladjustment, personality differences of perception, personality traits were analyzed as the relationship between marital satisfaction. The result were found that there was the difference of marital satisfaction by character and the types of personality, and the degree of maladjustment of personality was negatively related to marital satisfaction. Obsessive-compulsive personality was related to the highest levels of marital satisfaction, and antisocial personality was related to the lowest levels of marital satisfaction. Also, neuroticism had a negatively strong association with marital satisfaction. In the correlations, the actor-effect has a stronger level of correlation with marital satisfaction than partner-reported personality does. Overall, the similarity of the couple appeared to be improving marital satisfaction. The set of personalities in which cluster C showed relatively high level of marital satisfaction, whereas set of cluster B showed the lowest level of marital satisfaction. Therefore, this study suggests that marital satisfaction is influenced by spouse's personality as well as the individual's personality.

keywords
marital satisfaction, similarity of personality, Diagnostic Test for Personality Disorders, set of personality, APIM, NEO-FFI, 결혼만족도, 성격유사성, 성격장애 진단검사, 성격의 조합, APIM, NEO-FF

Reference

1.

권정혜, 채규만 (1999). 한국판 결혼만족도 검사의 표준화 및 타당화연구. 한국임상심리학회지, 18, 123-139.

2.

서재삼, 황순택 (2006). 한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화. 한국임상심리학회지, 25, 273-288.

3.

이경임 (1995) 한국인의 NEO-PI-R 요인구조와 부적응 집단의 프로파일. 부산대학교 대학원 박사학위청구논문.

4.

황순택 (1995). 전형성 평정에 의한 성격장애 진단준거 개발. 연세대학교. 박사학위 청구논문.

5.

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition(DSM-IV). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

6.

Allen, A., & Thompson, T. (1984) Agreement, understanding, realization, and feeling understood as predictors of communicative satisfaction in marital dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 916-921.

7.

Barelds, D. P. H. (2005). Self and partner personality in intimate relationship. European Journal of Personality, 19, 501-518.

8.

Bauserman, S. A. K., Arias, I. & Craighead, W. E. (1995) Marital attributions in spouses of depressed patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 17, 231-249.

9.

Beach, S. R. H., & Jones, D. J. (2002). Marital and family therapy for depression in adults. In I. H. Gotlib & C. L. Hammen(Eds.), Handbook of Depression (pp. 422-440). New York: Guilford Press.

10.

Botwin, M., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preference : Five factors in mate selectiom and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107-136.

11.

Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as an intergrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 713-721.

12.

Burman, B., & Margolin, G. (1992). Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: An interactional perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 39-63.

13.

Coyne, J. C., Thompson, R., & Palmer, S. C. (2002). Marital quality, coping with conflict, marital complaints, and affection in couples with a depressed wife. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 26-37.

14.

Emery, R. E., and O’'Leary, K. D. (1982). Children’'s perceptions of marital discord and behavior problems of boys and girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 11-24.

15.

Epstein, E., & Guttman, R. (1985). Mate selection in man: evidence, theory, and outcome, Social Biology, 31, 243-278.

16.

Fincham, F. D. (2003). Marital conflict: Correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 23-27.

17.

Glicksohn, J. & Golan, H. (2001) Personality, cognitive style and assortative mating. Personality and individual Differences. 30, 1199-1209.

18.

Heyman, R. E. (2001). Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundation. Psychological Assessment, 13, 5-35.

19.

Jones, J. T. and Cunningham, J. D. (1996). Attachment styles and other predictors of relationship satisfaction in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 3. 387-399.

20.

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, I. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.

21.

Karney, B. R. and Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075–1092.

22.

Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Sullivan, K. T. (1994). The role of negative affectivity in the association between attributions and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 413-424.

23.

Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd(Eds.), Handbook of reserch methods in social and personality psychology(pp. 452-477). Cambridge University Press.

24.

Kelly, E. L., & Conley, J. J. (1987) Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital dissatisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27–.40.

25.

Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Malarkey, W. B., Chee, M., Newton, T., Cacioppo, J. T., Mao, H. Y., & Glaser, R. (1993). Negative behavior during marital conflict is associated with immunological down-regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 395-409.

26.

McCrae, R. R. (1994). The counterpoint of personality assessment : Self - reports and observer ratings. Assessment, 1, 159–172.

27.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.

28.

McGlashan, T. H., Grilo, C. M., Sanislow, C. A., Ralevski, E., Morey, L. C., & Gunderson, J. G. (2005). Two-year prevalence and stability of individual DSM-Ⅳ criteria for schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders: Toward a hybrid model of Axis Ⅱ disorders. American Journal of psychiatry, 162, 883-889.

29.

Murphy, C. M., & O'Farrell, T. J. (1994). Factors associated with marital aggression in male alcoholics. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 321-335.

30.

Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.

31.

Robins, W. R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners' personality trait shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of personality and Social psychology, 79, 251-259.

32.

Robins, W. R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). It's not just who you're with, it's who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 925-964.

33.

Snyder, D. K. (1979). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 813-823.

34.

South, S. C. (2006). Personality Pathology Assessed by Self-and Other Report: Implication for Marital Satisfaction and Conflict. University of Virginia.

35.

Tucker, J. S., & Anders, S. L. (1999). Attachment style, interpersonal perception accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 403-412.

36.

Van den Broucke, S., Vandereycken, W., & Norre, J. (1997). Eating disorders and marital relationships. London: Routledge.

37.

Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self-and partner-rating. Journal of Personality, 63, 413-449.

38.

Whisman, M. A., Uebelacker, L. A., & Weinstock, L. M. (2004). Psychopathology and marital satisfaction: The importance of evaluating both partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 830-838.

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology