Exploration of Faking on Measures of Dark Side of Personality in terms of Gender, Response Situation, Type of Measures
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of response situation(honest /faking), type of personality measures(Normative/Ipsative), and gender(male/female) on the dark side of personality related to derailment factors. The normative form of dark side of personality measures consists of 120 items, while the ipsative is composed of 40 sets of items with 3 alternatives. 414 college students completed both normative and ipsative version of the personality inventory related to derailment factors either honestly or in a fake-good condition. The results of three-way ANOVA with hybrid design demonstrated the significant main effect for response situation and gender. In the case of the interaction, the significant two-way interaction of response situation and type of personality measures was supported. However, there was no significant three-way interaction of response situation, types of personality measures and gender, indicating the two-way interaction of response situation and type of personality measures was consistent across gender. This shows the ipsative type can reduce the faking behavior in the context of personnel selection compared to the normative in males as well as females. Suggestions for future research and practical implications were provided based on the findings.
- keywords
- Gender differences, Dark Side of Personality, Faking, Normative, Ipsative, 남녀차이, 어두운 성격요인, 응답왜곡
Reference
고재홍, 조기영 (2003). 청소년의 긍정적 착각과 심리적 안녕감간의 관계. 청소년상담연구, 11(1), 166-181.
강지연 (2011). 한국경제 기업 80% “신입들, 스펙갖고 고생하지마. 문제는 인성이야!”
김명소, 이헌주 (2006). 성격검사 형식이 응답왜곡(faking)에 미치는 효과: Normative 형식과 Ipsative 형식의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직심리, 19(3), 371-393.
김미정 (2007). MMPI 성격특성과 자아방어기제간의 관계. 건양대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
김시나 (2010). 이탈과 관련된 어두운 성격요인의 Ipsative 검사개발과 응답왜곡(Faking) 연구: Normative 형식과의 비교. 호서대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
박지훈 (2007). 부분적 Ipsative 형식을 이용한 역량검사의 타당화. 대구대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
이종구, 한영석 (2008). 텔레마케터 선발용 역량검사의 구성형식별 신뢰도와 타당도: Ipsative와 Normative 측정간 비교. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 21(3), 411-428.
이은정, 박동건 (2003). 성격 검사의 응답왜곡 탐지: 직무 바람직성의 개념화 및 선발 결정에의 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 16(2), 121-151.
조인철, 김명소 (2010) 이탈과 관련된 역기능적 성격요인의 구성 타당화 및 대학생활 효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구: HDS(Hogan Development Survey)를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(3), 575-603.
한상엽 (2008). 온보딩 프로그램, 신임 리더의 실패 줄인다. LG경제연구원.
Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self- evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630.
Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 49-56.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1996). Effect of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 262-272.
Bartram, D. (1996). The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 25-39.
Becker, T. E., & Colquitt, A. L. (1992). Potential versus actual faking of a biodata form: An analysis along several dimensions of item type. Personnel Psychology, 45, 389-406.
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003), More than one way to make an impression; Exploring profiles of impression management. Journal of Management, 29(2), 141-160.
Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., Johnston, N. G., & Rothstein, M. G. (1994). Correcting the 16PF for faking: Effects on criterion-related validity and individual hiring decisions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 847-860.
Cornwell, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Savillc & Willson (1991). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 89-100.
Dunnette, M. D., McCarney, J., Carlson, H. C., & Kirchner, W. K. (1962). A study of faking behavior on a forced-choice self-description checklist. Personnel Psychology, 15, 13-24.
Dwight, S. A. & Donovan, J. J. (2003). Do Warnings not to Fake Reduce Faking? Human Performance, 16, 1-23.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ellingson, J. E., Sackett, P. R., & Hough, L. M. (1999). Social desirability corrections in personality measurement: Issues of applicant comparison and construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 155-166.
Flynn, F. J., & Ames, D. R. (2006). What’s good for the goose may not be good for the gander: The benefits of self-monitoring for men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 272-281.
Hicks, L. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 167-184.
Hogan, R, Hogan, J, & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions. American Psychologist, 51, 469-477.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan Development Survey Manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view of the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40-51.
Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11, 209-244.
Hough, L., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., & McCloy, R. A. (1990). Criterion-related validity of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581-595.
Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced-choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13(4), 371-388.
John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206-219.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855-875.
Kaiser, R. B., & Hogan, R. (2007). The dark side of discretion. In J. Hunt(Series Ed.) & R. Hooijberg, J. Hunt, J. Antonakis, K. Boal, & N. Lane(Vol. Eds), Monographs in leadership and management: Vol. 4, Being there even when you are not: Leading through strategy, Systems and structure (pp.173-193). Oxford, England: JAI Press.
Kamp, J. D. (1996). Personal communication, May 30, 1996.
Levine, S., & Feldman, R. (2002). Women’s and men’s nonverbal behavior and self-monitoring in a job interview setting. Applied HRM Research, 7(1), 1-14.
Lombardo, M., & McCauley, C. (1988). The dynamics of management derailment. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Martin, B. A., Bowen, C. C., & Hunt, S. T. (2002). How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 247-256.
Merritt SL., & Marshall JC. (1984). Reliability and construct validity of alternate forms of the CLS Inventory. Advances in Nursing Science. 7: 78-85.
McFarland, L. A. & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in Faking Across Noncognitive Measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.
Mueller-Hanson, R., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton, G. C. (2006), Individual differences in impression management: An exploration of the psychological processes underlying faking. Psychology Science, 48(3), 288-312.
Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. F. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356-362.
Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Reiss, A. D. (1996). Role of Social Desirability in Personality Testing for Personnel Selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-409.
Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1991). Faking job profiles. Paper presented at the meeting of the America Psychological Association. San Francisco, CA.
Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self- enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208.
Rolland, J.-P., & De Fruyt, F. (2003). The validity of FFM personality dimensions and maladaptive traits to predict negative affects at work: A 6 months prospective study in a military sample. European Journal of Personality, 17, 101-121.
Ross, J. G., Strcher, M. D., Miller, J. L., & Levin, R. A. (1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 634-644.
Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2006). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? Human Resource Management Review, 16. 155- 180.
Saville, P. & Willson, E. (1991). The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 64, 219-238.
Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The Big Five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 966-974.
Schmit, M. J., Kilm, J. A., & Robie, C. A. (2000). Development of a global measure of personality. Personnel Psychology, 53, 153-193.
Singh, V., Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2002), Gender and impression management: Playing the promotion game. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 77-89.
Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S (1999). Meta- analysis of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurements. Educational Psychological Measurement, 59, 197- 210.
Weybrew, H. M. S. (1970). Epidemiological investigations in Polaris submarines. Pages 9-53, in I. H. Silver, Ed. Aerobiology, proceedings of the third international Symposium. Academic Press, New York.
Zickar MJ, Rosse JG, Levin RA, Hulin CL. (1996, April). Modeling the effects of faking on personality tests. Paper presented at the 11th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations