본 연구는 성폭력 통념수용, 대인폭력수용과 성역할 관련 태도가 공격적 성행동에 미치는 영향을 확인하고자 하였다. 일차적으로 성폭력 통념에 대한 남녀 간의 시각차를 확인하고, 이어서 남학생들을 대상으로 성적 공격집단과 비공격집단 간에 성폭력 통념, 대인폭력수용 및 성역할 관련 태도 상의 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 360명의 학생(남자 171명, 여자 189명)들을 대상으로 수집된 자료를 분석(t-검증, 상관관계)하였다. 그 결과 성폭력 통념 중 강간통념에서는 가해자의 욕망요인을 제외한 나머지 4개 요인에서 남학생들이 높은 수용도를 보였으며, 성희롱 통념에 대해서는 피해과소평가 요인만 차이가 없었고 나머지 요인에서 남학생들이 유의미하게 높은 수용도를 보였다. 한편 주 연구목적인 성적 공격집단과 비공격집단 간에 성폭력 통념, 대인폭력수용 및 성역할 관련 태도 상에서 차이가 있는지를 확인한 결과 대인폭력수용과 반여성주의 태도에서 유의미한 차이를 보여주었다. 연구 결과 학내 성폭력 예방을 위한 교육에서는 개인의 폭력성을 완화하고, 성평등의식을 강화하며 성적 공격행동의 정당성 혹은 합리화를 부추기는 그릇된 사회적 통념을 바로잡는 내용들이 강조되어야 할 것으로 본다.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of acceptance of sexual violence myths, interpersonal violence acceptance and sex role related attitudes on aggressive sexual behavior. The participants were 360 students (171 males, 189 females). T-test, correlation analysis were used for the analysis of data collected from the participants. According to the results, male students generally showed higher degree of acceptance in myths on rape and sexual harassment. The main purpose of this study is to identify that there are diffrences about the attitudes on sexual violence myths (rape, sexual harassment), interpersonal violence acceptance, and sex role related between sexually aggressive group and non-agressive group. In this study, there is a significant correlation between myths on sexual violence, interpersonal violence acceptance and sex role related attitudes. Sexually aggressive group and non-aggressive group showed a significant difference in the acceptance of interpersonal violence and anti-feminism attitude. Proposals for sexual violence prevention and related education through the result obtained are as follow; First of all, focus on alleviating the individual’s violent act and strengthening the gender equality awareness is needed. Also, contents regarding the reforming of common notions that encourage the legitimacy or rationalization of aggressive sexual behavior should be included.
강희순, 이은숙 (2010). 대학생의 데이트 성폭력 가해경험과 관련 요인. 보건교육 건강증진학회지, 27(3). 한국보건교육 건강증진학회.
김양희 (2013). 젠더기반폭력 무엇이, 왜 문제 인가?. The Asian. 2013.
김현정 (1998). 직장내 성적 괴롭힘에 관한 심리학적 일 연구: 동기와 고정관념을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.
김정인, 손영미, 김효창 (2006). 성별 및 성희롱 경험에 따른 성희롱 통념과 성역할관련 태도들간의 관계. 한국심리학회지(여성), 11(4), 377-397.
남원경 (2008). 미혼남성의 데이트 성폭력 가해경험과 그 영향요인에 관한 연구: 부산지역을중심으로. 신라대학교 대학원. 석사학위논문.
대검찰청 범죄분석(2014). 범죄분석(2003).
박경 (2008). 과잉남성성과 성적 공격성간의관계: 공감 및 강간통념의 중재 및 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 20(2), 519-536.
박지선 (2011). 경찰대 학생들의 강간통념 수용도: 일반대 학생들과의 비교를 중심으로. 경찰대학논문집, 제 31집, 237-267.
서경현, 이경순 (2002). 대학생들의 데이트폭력과 예측변인. 대한여성간호학회지, 2, 75-98.
이석재 (1999). 강간통념척도의 개발과 타당도검증. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 2, 131-148.
이석재, 최상진 (2001). 강간통념수용도에 따른 성행동, 성폭력 및 성폭행사건 지각, 한국심리학회지(사회 및 성격), 29, 97-116.
장윤경 (2002). 성폭력 피해 경험에 관한 연구:데이트 성폭력 인지도의 매개효과를 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 대학원. 석사학위논문.
조현빈 (2006). 성폭력과 성폭력 피해자 심리의 이해, 한국범죄심리학회지, 2(2). 39-59.
한국여성민우회 (2013). 성폭력 상담소 2013년도 상담현황 및 분석.
한국여성의 전화 (2009). 성폭력 상담소 2007-2008 상담결과 분석.
한국성폭력상담소 (2001). 2001년 상담통계
홍대식 (2007). 사회심리학. 박영사, 서울.
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T. N., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim ·blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
American College Health Association. (2013). American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Reference group executive summary. Hanover, MD: Author.
Anderson, K. B., Cooper, H., & Okamura, L. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 295-315.
Baron, L., & Straus, M. A. (1987). Four theories of rape: A macrosociological analysis. Social Problems, 34, 467-489.
Belknap, Joanne. (2001). The Invisible Woman:Gender, Crime, and Justice. Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Group.
Bohner, G., Reinhard, M., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1988). Rape myth as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a casual impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268.
Bohner, G., Siebler, F., & Schmelcher, J. (2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping:Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men's rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 286-297.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men. Women and Rape. New York: Simon &Schuster.
Burgess, G. H. (2007). Assessment of rapesupportive attitudes and beliefs in college men: Development, reliability, and validity of the Rape Attitudes and Beliefs Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 973-993.
Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2007). How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 57, 131-136.
Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1985). An empirical assessment of some feminist hypotheses about rape. International Journal of Women's Studies, 8, 414-423.
Check, J. V. P., Malamuth, N. M., Elias, B., & Barton, S. (1985). On hostile ground. Psychology Today, 56-61.
Collings, S. J. (1994). Sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of predictors in a non-forensic samples. South African Journal of Psychology, 24, 35-38.
Craig, M. E. (1990). Coercive sexuality in dating relationships: A situational model. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 393-423.
Davies, M., Gilston, J., & Rogers, P. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2807-2823.
Egan, R., & Wilson, J. C. (2012). Rape victims’attitudes to rape myth acceptance. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 19, 345-357.
Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. M. (2004). Explanations for the decline in child sexual abuse cases. Bulletin.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Fonow, M. M., Richardson, L., & Wemmerus, V. A. (1992). Feminist rape education: Does it work? Gender and Society, 6, 108-121.
Gannon, T. A., Collie, R. M., Ward, T., & Thakker, J. (2008). Rape: Psychopathology, theory, and treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 982-1008.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Hammond, E. M., Berry, M. A., & Rodriguez, D. N. (2011). The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 16, 242-252.
Herman, J. L. (1990). Sex offenders: A feminist perspective. In W. I. Marshall, D. R. H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of Sexual Assault:Issues, Theories and Treatment of the Offender(pp. 117-193). New York: Plenum.
Heyman, R. E., O'Leary, K. D., & Juriles, E. N. (1995). Alcohol and aggressive personality styles: Potentiators of serious physical aggression against wives?, Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 44-57.
HOSB (2009). Home Office Statistical Bulletin 11/09. Crime in England & Wales, 2008/9: London:Home Office.
Johnson, B. E., Kuck, D. L., & Schander, P. R. (1997). Rape Myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A Multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 693-707.
Komorosky, D. (2003). Predictors of Rape Myth Acceptance Among Criminology and Non-Criminology Students. PhD Dissertation, Department of Criminology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Koss, M. P. (1992). The underdetection of rape:Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 61-75.
Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1987). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 528, 133-147.
Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezley, D., & Oros, C. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981-992.
Lalumiere, M., Harris, G., Quinsey, V., & Rice, M. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in Male Propensity for Sexual Aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lambert, A. J., & Raichle, K. (2000). The role of political ideology in mediating judgments of blame in rape victims and their assailants: A test of the just world, personal responsibility and legitimization hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 853-863.
Langton, C. (2007). Rape related cognition:Current research. In T. A. Gannon, T. Ward, A. R. Beech, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Aggressive Offenders' Cognition: Research, Theory, and Practice. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Linton, D. N., McDonel, E. C., & McFall, R. M. (1987). Heterosocial perception in rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 17-21.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138-157.
Malamuth, N. M (1986). Predictors of naturalistic aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50, 953-962.
Malamuth, N. M. (1987). A multidimensional approach to sexual aggression: Combining measures of past behavior with present likelihood. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 528, 123-132.
Malamuth, N., Check, J. V. P., & Briere, J. (1986). Sexual arousal in response to aggression: Ideological, aggressive, and sexual correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 330-340.
Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1989). Sexual violence. In K. Howell & C., R. Hollin(Eds.), Clinical Approaches to Violence (pp. 205-246). Chchester: Wiley.
Maxwell, L., & Scott, G. (2014). A review of the role of radical feminist theories in the understanding of rape myth acceptance. Journal of Dexual Aggression: An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice, 20(1), 40-54.
Miller, L. (2013). Sexual offenses against children:Patterns and motives. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 506-519.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Falcon, P. L. (1990). Men's heterosocial skill and attitude toward women as predictors of verbal sexual coercion and forceful rape. Sex Roles, 23, 241-259.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 34, 186-196.
Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys”, then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359-375.
Nagel, B., Matsuo, H., McIntyre, K. P., & Morrison. N. (2005). Attitudes toward victims of rape: Effects of gender, race, religion, and social class. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 725-737.
Peggy, S. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 8-18.
Peterson, Zoe D., & Charlene L. Muehlenhard. (2004). “As it Rape? The Function of Women’ Rape Myth Acceptance and Definitions of Sex in Labeling Their Own Experiences.” Sex Roles, 51, 129-144.
Polaschek, D. L. L., & Gannon, T. A. (2004). The implicit theories of rapists: What convicted offenders tell us. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 299-315.
Polaschek, D. L. L., & Ward, T. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 385-406.
Quackenbush, R. L. (1989). A comparison of androgynous, masculine sex-typed and undifferentiated males on dimensions and attitudes toward rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 318-342.
Quackenbush, R. L. (1991). Attitudes of college men toward women and rape. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 376-377.
Quimet, M. (2002). Explaining the American and Canadian crime “drop” in the 1990's. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 44, 33-50.
Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., Caldwell, D., & DeLuca, L. (1992). Tolerance for sexual harassment related to self-reported sexual victimization. Gender and Society, 6, 122-138.
Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual Exploitation: Rape, Child Sexual Abuse, and Workplace Harassment. Bevery Hills, CA, Sage.
Ryan, K. M. (2004). Further evidence for a cognitive component of rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 579-604.
Shultz, S. K., Scherman, A., & Marshall, L. J. (2000). Evaluation of a university-based date rape prevention program: Effect on attitudes and behaviors related to rape. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 193-201.
Smallbone, S. W., Wheaton, J., & Hourigan, D. (2003). Trait empathy and criminal versatility in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 49-60.
Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A metaanalysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(11), 2010-2035.
Ward, C. (1988). The attitudes toward rape victims scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 127-146.
Ward, T. (2000). Sexual offenders' cognitive distortions as implicit theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 491-507.
Wilson, L., Mouilso, E., Gentile, B., Calhoun, K., & Zeichner, A. (2015). How is sexual aggression related to nonsexual aggression? A meta-analytic review. Aggresson and Violent Behavior, 24, 199-223.
Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Resnick, H. S., McCauley, J. L., Amstadter, A. B., Kilpatrick, D. G., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2011). Is reporting of rape on the rise? A comparison of women with reported versus unreported rape experiences in the national women’ study-replication. The Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 807-832.
Wyer, R. S., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Gorman, J. F. (1985). Cognitive mediators of reactions to rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 324-338.
Yamawaki, N. (2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and gender-role traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 406-423.
