바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

미혼 커플의 비난 및 철회 의사소통에서 지각의 정확성과 편향

Criticism and Withdrawal Communication among Dating Couples: Perceptual Accuracy and Bias

초록

본 연구는 미혼 커플이 파트너의 비난 및 철회 의사소통을 얼마나 정확하게 지각하는지(지각의 정확성), 얼마나 긍정 편향 혹은 부정 편향되게 지각하는지(지향성 편향), 또 파트너의 의사소통을 지각할 때 지각자의 동일한 의사소통 양식이 얼마나 영향을 미치는지(지각의 유사성 편향)를 진실과 편향 모형(Truth and Bias Model; West & Kenny, 2011)을 적용하여 살펴보았다. 이에 더하여, 파트너의 비난 의사소통을 지각할 때는 지각자의 철회 의사소통, 파트너의 철회 의사소통을 지각할 때는 지각자의 비난 의사소통의 조절효과와 성별 및 교제기간의 조절효과를 살펴보았다. 미혼 커플에게서 수집한 197쌍의 자료가 최종 분석에 포함되었고, SPSS 18의 혼합모형(Mixed Model) 프로그램을 이용하여 다층모형(Multilevel Modeling) 분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 남녀 모두 파트너의 비난과 철회를 지각할 때 지각의 정확성은 유의하였다. 둘째, 파트너의 비난을 지각할 때는 남녀 모두 긍정 편향이 나타났고, 파트너의 철회를 지각할 때는 여성이 남성의 철회를 지각할 때만 긍정 편향이 나타났다. 셋째, 남녀 모두 비난 및 철회에서 지각의 유사성 편향은 유의하였고, 남성이 여성에 비해서 유의하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 지각자의 철회 및 비난을 각각 조절변인으로 포함했을 때, 남성의 지각의 유사성 편향은 여전히 유의하였고, 여성의 지각의 유사성 편향은 유의하지 않았다. 넷째, 파트너의 철회를 지각할 때 지각의 정확성과 지각의 유사성 편향에서 남성의 비난의 조절효과가 나타났다. 다섯째, 교제기간은 여성이 지각한 파트너의 철회에서의 긍정 편향을 낮추는 것으로 나타났고, 지각의 정확성이나 지각의 유사성 편향에서의 조절효과는 유의하지 않았다. 본 연구의 결과를 논의하였고, 연구의 의의, 상담 실제에 대한 함의, 연구의 제한점 및 후속 연구를 위한 제언을 포함하였다.

keywords
criticism, withdrawal, communication, perceptual accuracy, directional bias, perceptual similarity bias, Truth and Bias model, dating couples, sex difference, dating length, 비난, 철회, 의사소통, 지각의 정확성, 지향성 편향, 지각의 유사성 편향, 진실과 편향 모형, 미혼 커플, 성차, 교제기간

Abstract

This study examined perceptual accuracy, directional bias, and perceptual similarity bias in perceiving partner’s criticism and withdrawal communication among dating couples, applying Truth and Bias model (West & Kenny, 2011). In addition, the moderating effects of perceiver's withdrawal (in perception of partner’s criticism) and criticism (in perception of partner’s withdrawal), gender, and dating length were tested. Data collected from 197 dating couples were analyzed adopting Multi-level Modeling. For the Multi-level Modeling analysis, SPSS Mixed Modeling program was utilized. The results of this study were as follows. First, the perceptual accuracy in perceiving partner’s criticism and withdrawal were significant for both men and women. Second, regarding directional bias, there were positive biases in perceiving partner’s criticism for both men and women while there was positive bias in women’s perceiving partner’s withdrawal and not in men’s perception. Third, perceptual similarity bias in perceiving partner’s criticism and withdrawal were significant for both men and women, and women were higher in perceptual similarity bias than men. When perceiver’s withdrawal and criticism and dating length were included as moderators respectively, perceptual similarity bias were still significant for men, but not for women. Fourth, men’s criticism had moderating effects in men’s perceptual accuracy and perceptual similarity bias in perceiving partner’s withdrawal. Fifth, dating length decreased the positive bias in women’s perceiving partner’s withdrawal, but did not moderate perceptual accuracy and perceptual similarity bias. The results of this study were discussed and the theoretical implications, practical implications, limitation of this study and suggestions for further study were included.

keywords
criticism, withdrawal, communication, perceptual accuracy, directional bias, perceptual similarity bias, Truth and Bias model, dating couples, sex difference, dating length, 비난, 철회, 의사소통, 지각의 정확성, 지향성 편향, 지각의 유사성 편향, 진실과 편향 모형, 미혼 커플, 성차, 교제기간

참고문헌

1.

권윤아, 김득성 (2008). 부부간 역기능적 의사소통 행동 척도 개발. 대한가정학회지 46(6), 101-113.

2.

김미정, 조영주 (2017). 미혼 커플의 성인애착이 관계 만족도에 미치는 영향: 역기능적의사소통의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 22(2), 89-114.

3.

김민선, 신희천 (2011). 언어적 억제가 결혼만족에 미치는 영향: 요구-철회 의사소통 패턴의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및성격, 25(2), 35-49.

4.

서영석 (2010). 상담심리 연구에서 매개효과와조절효과 검증: 개념적 구분 및 자료 분석 시 고려 사항. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및심리치료, 22(4), 1147-1168.

5.

이정은, 이영호 (2000). 개인특성, 스트레스 및부부간 의사소통과 결혼만족도 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(3), 531-548.

6.

이종선, 권정혜 (2002). 부부의 대인관계, 의사소통 방식, 결혼만족도가 부부폭력에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(2), 313-330.

7.

이희윤, 조유현 (2015). 부부의 관계신념지각, 배우자의 긍정적 행동만족, 의사소통이결혼만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구:부부차이를 중심으로. 가족과 문화, 27(4), 62-88.

8.

장문선, 김영환 (2002). 부부의사소통 패턴과특징적 갈등대처방식. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(2), 331-347.

9.

장문선, 김영환 (2003). 기혼여성 우울증 환자의 결혼만족도에서 역기능적 태도와 부부의사소통 패턴의 특성. 한국심리학회지:임상, 22(2), 399-414.

10.

정경아, 김봉환 (2010). 성인애착, 공감능력 및결혼만족도 간의 관계. 인간이해. 31(1), 89-104.

11.

조영주 (2017). 역기능적 의사소통의 프로파일수준 및 형태 유사성이 미혼 커플의 관계만족에 미치는 영향. 상담학연구, 18(1), 23-44.

12.

현미나, 채규만 (2012). 성인애착이 결혼만족도에 미치는 영향에 있어서 정서조절 곤란의 매개효과. 한국가족관계학회지, 16(4), 69-85.

13.

황민혜, 고재홍 (2010). 부부간 결혼가치관 차이, 오해 및 부부갈등: 의사소통의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 15(4), 779-800.

14.

Baucom, B. R., Atkins, D. C., Eldridge, K., McFarland, P., Sevier, M., & Christensen, A. (2011). The language of demand/withdraw:Verbal and vocal expression in dyadic interactions. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 570-580.

15.

Caughlin, J. P., & Scott, A. M. (2010). Toward a communication theory of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction in interpersonal relationships. In S. W. Smith & S. R. Wilson (Eds.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (pp. 180-200). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

16.

Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1999). Desire for change in one’s partner as a predictor of the demand/withdraw pattern of marital communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 66-89.

17.

Christensen, A. (1987). Detection of conflict patterns in couples. In K. Hahlweg & M. J. Goldstein (Eds.), Understanding major mental disorders: The contribution of family interaction research (pp. 250-265). New York: Fmily Process Press.

18.

Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31-52). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

19.

Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw interaction pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73-81.

20.

Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Los Angeles.

21.

Christensen, A., Eldridge, K., Catta-Preta, A. B., Lim, V. R., & Samtagata, R. (2006). Cross-cultural consistency of the demand/withdraw interaction pattern in couples. Journal of Marriage and Family 68, 1029-1044.

22.

David, P. (2015). Wedding the Gottman and Johnson Approaches into an Integrated Model of Couple Therapy. The Family Journal:Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 23(4), 336-345.

23.

Decuyper, M., De Bolle, M., & De Fruyt, F. (2012). Personality similarity, perceptual accuracy, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 19, 128-145.

24.

Eldridge, K. A., & Christensen, A. (2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289-322). New York:Cambridge University Press.

25.

Fletcher, G. J. O., & Kerr, P. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627-658.

26.

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115-134.

27.

Gagné, F. M., & Lydon, J. E. (2003). Identification and the commitment shift:Accounting for gender differences in relationship illusions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 907-919.

28.

Gottman, J. M., & Levinson, R. W. (1988). The social psychophysiology of marriage. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 182-200). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Mastters.

29.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2002). 행복한 부부 이혼하는 부부: 행복한 결혼생활을 위한 7가지 원칙. (임주현 역). 서울: 문학사상. (원전은 1999에 출판)

30.

Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences:Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

31.

Heavey, C. L., Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16-27.

32.

Holley, S. R., Sturm, V. E., & Levenson, R. W. (2010). Exploring the basis for gender differences in the demand-withdraw pattern. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 666-684.

33.

Humbad, M. N., Donnellan, M. B., Klump, K. L., & Burt, S. A. (2011). Development of the Brief Romantic Relationship Interaction Coding Scheme (BRRICS). Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 759-769.

34.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused marital therapy: Creating connections. New York: Brunner/ Mazel.

35.

Kenny, D. A., & Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439-448.

36.

Kenny, D. A., Kashy. D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York:Guilford Press.

37.

Klinetob, N. A., & Smith, D. A. (1996). Demand-withdraw communication in marital interaction: Tests of interspousal contingency and gender role hypotheses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 945-958.

38.

Letzring, T. D., Well, S. M., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 111-123.

39.

McGinn, M. M., McFarland, P. T., & Christensen, A. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of demand/withdraw. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 749-757

40.

Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586-604.

41.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Bellavia, G., Griffin, D. W., & Dolderman, D. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563-581.

42.

Noller, P., & White, A. (1990). The validity of the Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 2, 478-482.

43.

Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). When bias and insecurity promote accuracy: Mean-level bias and tracking accuracy in couples’ conflict discussions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 642-655.

44.

Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.

45.

Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Shimkowski, J. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 28-58.

46.

Siffert, A., & Schwarz, B. (2010). Spouses’ demand and withdrawal during marital conflict in relation to their subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 262-277.

47.

Swann, W. B., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857-869.

48.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (3rd eds.). New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publishers.

49.

Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1079-1094.

50.

Trusty, J., Ng, K.-M., & Watts, R. E. (2005). Model of effects of adult attachment on emotional empathy of counseling students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(1), 66-77.

51.

Vogel, D. L., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Demands and withdrawal in newlyweds: Elaborating on the social structure hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(5), 685-701.

52.

West, T. V., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357-378.

53.

West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural equation modeling;Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, CA; Sage.

logo