바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Distribution of Environmental Awareness Applying an Ecological Theory of Ted Hughes

The Journal of Distribution Science / The Journal of Distribution Science, (P)1738-3110; (E)2093-7717
2021, v.19 no.9, pp.53-64
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.9.202109.53
CHO, Jongwhee
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Purpose: The current study aims and reviews the current state of research in green awareness' distribution structure using the ecological theory of Ted Hughes who was regarded as one of the best English poets of the 20 century. Ted poetry has innovated ecological distribution. It has inspired so many young people to have a positive energy impact on the environment. Research design, data and methodology: Action research design is an approach used extensively in qualitative content analysis. This design starts by adopting an exploratory claim that develops the research objectives, hence instigating the action process, which involves several strategies. This type of design involves a cyclic process of stance then action. Results: According to the investigation, there are nine solutions that can deal with the green distribution based on previous literature review, applying an ecological approach of Ted Hughes to green awareness distribution. The solutions figured out that Ted's novels had an innovative impact on the environment as it is clear that information is given to society. Conclusions: It is observed that having a highly professional environment is good enough for a structure to go green. But, on the other hand, polluting our environment can endanger species by causing health diseases and environmental problems.

keywords
Green Awareness Distribution, Ecological Distribution System, Innovative Environmental Supply

Reference

1.

Awan, U., Nauman, S., & Sroufe, R. (2021). Exploring the effect of buyer engagement on green product innovation: Empirical evidence from manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 463-477.

2.

Baby, K. T. The Significance of Ecological References in the Poetry of Ted Hughes: A Critical Analysis. Significance, 7(18), 2020.

3.

Bitektine, A. (2008). Prospective case study design:qualitative method for deductive theory testing. Organizational research methods, 11(1), 160-180.

4.

Buhl, A. (2018). Do it yourself-a lean startup toolbox for employee-driven green product innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 22(4-5), 526-544.

5.

Burns, M. K. (2011). School psychology research:Combining ecological theory and prevention science. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 132-139.

6.

Chakrabarti, A. K. (1974). The role of champion in product innovation. California management review, 17(2), 58-62.

7.

Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, (Part B), 384-391.

8.

Chang, C. H. (2016). The determinants of green product innovation performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(2), 65-76.

9.

Chang, C. H. (2018). How to enhance green service and green product innovation performance? The roles of inward and outward capabilities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 411-425.

10.

Chapman, R., & Hyland, P. (2004). Complexity and learning behaviors in product innovation. Technovation, 24(7), 553-561.

11.

Choi, D. H. (2021). Digital Forensic: Challenges and Solution in the Protection of Corporate Crime. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 12(6), 47-55.

12.

Coghlan, D., & Shani, A. R. (2005). Roles, politics, and ethics in action research design. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18(6), 533-546.

13.

Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability‐ oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.

14.

De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., & Cassia, L. (2015). Product innovation in family versus non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1-36.

15.

Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.

16.

Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1120-1153.

17.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

18.

Guoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., & Hailiang, Z. (2013). Stakeholders' influences on corporate green innovation strategy: a case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 1-14.

19.

Hughes, P. W. (2017). Between semelparity and iteroparity:empirical evidence for a continuum of modes of parity. Ecology and evolution, 7(20), 8232-8261.

20.

Ilg, P. (2019). How to foster green product innovation in an inert sector. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 129-138.

21.

Kohlbacher, F. (2006) The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1). 1-30.

22.

Lau, C. M., & Ngo, H. Y. (2004). The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation. International business review, 13(6), 685-703.

23.

Lee, J. H. (2021). Effect of Sports Psychology on Enhancing Consumer Purchase Intention for Retailers of Sports Shops: Literature Content Analysis. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(4), 5-13.

24.

Lee, K. H., & Kim, J. W. (2011). Integrating suppliers into green product innovation development: an empirical case study in the semiconductor industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(8), 527-538.

25.

Li, Y., Tong, Y., Ye, F., & Song, J. (2020). The choice of the government green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs product subsidy. International Journal of Production Research, 58(16), 4932-4946.

26.

Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr, R. J. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1), 47-75.

27.

Maddock, I. (1999). The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater biology, 41(2), 373-391.

28.

Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, 1(2), 159-176.

29.

Melander, L. (2017). Achieving sustainable development by collaborating in green product innovation. Business strategy and the environment, 26(8), 1095-1109.

30.

Melander, L. (2018). Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation: External and internal capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(6), 677-693.

31.

Noci, G., & Verganti, R. (1999). Managing 'green product innovation in small firms. R&d Management, 29(1), 3-15.

32.

Olson, E. L. (2013). Perspective: the green innovation value chain: a tool for evaluating the diffusion prospects of green products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 782-793.

33.

Parthasarthy, R., & Hammond, J. (2002). Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effects of the innovation process. Journal of engineering and technology management, 19(1), 75-91.

34.

Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146-165.

35.

Reddick, Y. (2017). Ted Hughes: Environmentalist and Ecopoet. Springer International Publishing.

36.

Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management–an exploratory literature review. R&d Management, 42(2), 180-192.

37.

Song, W., Wang, G. Z., & Ma, X. (2020). Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 224-234.

38.

Sung, I. (2021). Interdisciplinary Literaure Analysis between Cosmetic Container Design and Customer Purchasing Intention. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 12(3), 21-29.

39.

Twiddy, I. (2009). Community Poems: Ted Hughes and the Eclogue. English, 58(222), 243-263.

40.

Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3), 65-72.

41.

Woo, E. J. (2021). The Relationship between Green Marketing and Firm Reputation: Evidence from Content Analysis. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 455-463.

42.

Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research, 101(August), 697-706.

43.

Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1012-1026.

44.

Zhao, Y., Feng, T., & Shi, H. (2018). External involvement and green product innovation: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1167-1180.

The Journal of Distribution Science