바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Implicit Representations of 'Close Relationship' and 'Instrumental Relationship' in College Students

Abstract

This study was conducted to iexplore mplicit representations of 'Close relationship' and 'Instrumental relationship' in College Students. Participants(220 male and female college students) were asked to complete an explicit questionnaire, RISC(Relational Interdependent Self-Construal) and SOC(Spheres of Control), and to respond 2 sorts of IAT(Implicit Assocation Test). The results were summed up as follows: Implicit representation of 'close relationship' is associated with 'comfort' and 'authentic' dimensions, whearas 'instrumental relationship' is associated with 'discomfort' and 'false' dimensions. IAT results were not correlated with explicit measures and did not show any significant difference between RISC high and low groups and between SOC high and low groups. The results were discussed in terms of development of relationship of college students and usefulness of IAT.

keywords
Submission Date
2006-01-14
Revised Date
2006-02-20
Accepted Date
2006-02-21

Reference

1.

권석만, (2004) 젊은이를 위한 인간관계의 심리학, 학지사

2.

방희정 ; 조혜자 ; 조숙자 ; 김현정, (2005) 한국 남녀 대학생의 ‘개인’과 ‘관계’의 암묵적 표상, 한국심리학회지 : 여성

3.

Aron, A, (1992) Inclusion of other scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

4.

Bakan, D, (1966) The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man, Boston : Bacon

5.

Bandura, A, (1996) A sociocognitive view on shaping the future ; Mind, machine and environment. Seoul : KPA

6.

Baldwin, M. W, (1992) Relational schemas and the processing of social information, Psychological Bulletin

7.

Baumeister, R, (1997) What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson , Psychological Bulletin

8.

Bornstein M. H, (1999) Develop- mental Psychology : An Advanced Textbook , New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

9.

Caspi, A, (1998) Personality development across the life course; Handbook of Child psychology Vol. 3, New York : John Wiley & Sons

10.

Clark, M. S, (1985) Implications of relationship type for understanding comparability; Compatible and incompatible relationships, New York : Basic Books

11.

Collins, W. A, (2002) Relational roots of romance : Beyond “chumships", Paper presented at the meeting if the Society for Research in Adolescence

12.

Cross, S. E, (2000) The relational-independent self-construct and relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

13.

Cross, S. E, (2002) Thinking about oneself and others: The relational- interdependent self-construal and social cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

14.

Erikson, E. H, (1968) Identity: Youth and crisis , New York: W. W. Norton

15.

Fazio, R, (1986) On the automatic activation of attitudes, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

16.

Fiske, A. P, (1991) Structures of social life : The four elementary forms of human relations, New York : The Free Press

17.

Gilligan, C, (1982) In a different voice : Psychological theory and women's development, Cambridge, MA : Harvard Univ. Press

18.

Greenwald, A, (2000) Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

19.

Greenwald, A, (2002) A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept, Psychological Review

20.

A, G. Greenwald, (2003) Understanding and using the implicit Association Test : I. An improved Scoring System, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

21.

Harter, S, (1998) The Development of Self- Representations. ; Handbook of Child psychology Vol. 3., New York : John Wiley & Sons

22.

Harter, S, (1999) The constructure of self, New York : Guilford

23.

S. Harter , (1989) Manifestations of true and false selves in adolescence, Paper presented at the meeting of the SRCD

24.

Higgins, E. T, (1996) Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience ; Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, NY: Guilford Press

25.

Hstings, C.T, (2001) Self-concept differentiation across the adult life span, Psychology and Aging

26.

Kaplan, A, (1989) 성의 심리학, 이화여자대학교 출판부

27.

Kim, Do-Yeong, (2001) Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test, Unpublished manuscript. Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.

28.

Locke, K. D.(, (2003) Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and Vertical and horizontal directions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

29.

MeConnell, A, (2005) Whose self is it anyway? Self-aspect control moderates the relation between self-complexity and well-being, Journal of Expeimental Social Psychology

30.

Paulhus, D, (1983) Sphere-specific measures of perceived control, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

31.

Paulhus, D, (1989) Attentional load increases the positivity of self-presentation, Social Cognition

32.

Rosenberg, M, (1965) Society and the adolescent self image, Princeton. NJ : Princeton Univ. Press

33.

Rosenberg, S, (1997) Multiplicity of selves; Self and Identity, NY: Oxford Press

34.

Rubin, K, (1998) Peer interaction, relations, and groups; Handbook of Child psychology Vol.3, New York : John Wiley & Sons

35.

Schlenker, B, (2003) Self-Presentation; Handbook of self and identity, New York : The Guilford Press

36.

Sedikides, C, (2001) Individual self, relational self, collective self. Ann Arbor, MI: Psychological Press

37.

Suh, E, (2002) Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

logo