바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Critical periods for second language acquisitions: An analytical review of developmental models

Abstract

Timing of exposure to an L2 is critical for maximizing language acquisition. Research from behavioral and brain studies has given rise to 4 main hypotheses regarding the L2 critical period. The hypotheses are as follows: (1) The critical period of L2 is equal to that of L1; (2) The first year of experience is decisive for acquiring L2 sounds; (3) Plasticity is progressively lost as one gets older, and; (4) Language sub-processes are differentially sensitive to biological time. The current paper reviews studies on these four lines of research within the framework of Greenough's and O'Connor's developmental models. Based on the present review, we suggest that earlier exposure to L2 is desirable for the second language acquisition. However, the length and the onset of the language ability was debatable according to the four topics of the research area. Elaboration of task-specific timetables in L2 acquisition was suggested to draw fuller educational implications.

keywords
Submission Date
2012-10-15
Revised Date
2012-11-23
Accepted Date
2012-11-24

Reference

1.

Birdsong, D. (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

2.

Boeckx, C. & Longa, V.M. (2011). Lenneberg’s Views on Language Development and Evolution and Their Relevance for Modern Biolinguistics, Biolinguistics, 5.3, 25-273.

3.

Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & van der Slik, F.(2002). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Study Linguistica. 54. 298-308.

4.

Caudery, T. (1999). Book review: Second language acqusition and the critical period hypothesis by Birdsong, David (1999). TESL-EJ, 4(2).

5.

Cheour, M., Ceponiene, R., Lehtokoski, A., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Alho, K., et al. (1998). Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 351-353.

6.

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants. Nature, 370, 292-295.

7.

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Cedric Boeckx (eds.).2011. The Biolinguistic Enterprise. NewPerspectives on the Evolution and Natureof the Human Language Faculty. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

8.

Greenough, W. T., Black, J. E., & Wallace, C. S. (1987). Experience and brain development. Child Development, 58, 539-559.

9.

Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: a test of the critical-period hypothesis for secondlanguage acquisition. Psychological Science, 14(1), 31-38.

10.

Jenkins, L.(2000), Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Jenkins, L.(ed.)(2004), Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

12.

Jeon, Y. H. (2003). Do younger children have an advantage over older children in learning English a foreign language? Early Childhood Education Research, 23(3), 285-305.

13.

Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-99.

14.

Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K. M., & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171-174.

15.

Knudsen, E.I.(2004), Sensitive period in the development of brain and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1412-25

16.

Krashen, S. D. (1973). Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period. Language Learning, 23, 63-74.

17.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language learning and acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

18.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London & New York: Longman.

19.

Krishnan, A., Xu, Y., Gandour, J., & Cariani, P.(2005). Encoding of pitch in the humanbrainstem is sensitive to languageexperience. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1),161-168.

20.

Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831-843.

21.

Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic Experience Alters Phonetic Perception in Infants by 6 Months of Age. Science, 255, 606-608.

22.

Kuhl, P.K.(2010). Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition, Neuron, 67, 713-727.

23.

Lenneberg. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

24.

Nelson, C. A. (2000). Neural plasticity and human development: the role of early experience in sculpting memory systems. Developmental Science, 3(2), 115-136.

25.

Neville, H. J., & Bavelier, D. (1998). Neural organization and plasticity of language. Neurobiology, 8, 254-258.

26.

Newton, M., (2002). Savage girls and wild boys: A history of feral children. London: Faber & Faber.

27.

Noble, K. G., McCandliss, B. D., & Farah, M. J.(2007). Socioeconomic Gradients PredictIndividual Differences in NeurocognitiveAbilities. Developmental Science, 10,464-480.

28.

O'Connor, T.G.(2003). Early experiences and psychological development: conceptual questions, empirical illustrations and implication for intervention. Developmental Psychopathology, 15, 671-90.

29.

Park, J. & Suk, D. (2007). A Study on language age and MLU-m Characteristics of Bilingual Environment Children, Korean Journal of Special Education: Practice and Issues, 8(3). 445-463.

30.

Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M., Dupoux, E., et al. (2003). Brain Imaging of Language Plasticity in Adopted Adults: Can a Second Language Replace the First? Cerebral Cortex, 13(2), 155-161

31.

Perani, D., Dehaene, S., Grassi, F., Cohen, L., Cappa, S., Dupoux, E., et al. (1996). Brain processing of native and foriegn language. Neuroreport, 7, 2439-2444.

32.

Pinker. (1994). The language instinct. New York: W. Morrow.

33.

Sakai, K. L. (2005). Language Acquisition and Brain Development. Science, 310, 815-819.

34.

Stevens, G. (2004). Using Census Data to Test the Critical-Period Hypothesis for Second-Language Acquisition. Psychological Science, 15(3), 215-216.

35.

Uylings, H. (2006). Development of the human cortex and the concept of critical or sensitive periods. Language Learning, 56, 59-90.

36.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Thought and language. Cambridge, Messachusetts: The M.I.T. Press.

37.

Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. J. (2001). Sensitive Periods Differentiate Processing of Open- and Closed-Class Words: An ERP Study of Bilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 44(6), 1338.

38.

Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 25(1), 121-133.

39.

Werker, J. F., Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K.,& Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspectsof cross-language speech perception. ChildDevelopment, 52, 349-355.

logo