Female Scientists' Expertise Development: Individual & Environmental Factors

최지영

doi:10.18205/kpa.2008.13.2.005

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.13 No.2

Citation
Share

Female Scientists' Expertise Development: Individual & Environmental Factors

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology / The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, (P)1229-0726; (E)3058-2083

2008, v.13 no.2, pp.153-176

https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.2.005

(2008). Female Scientists' Expertise Development: Individual & Environmental Factors. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 13(2), 153-176, https://doi.org/10.18205/kpa.2008.13.2.005

copy

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore key factors in the process of expertise development of talented female scientists who achieved outstanding research performance. To fulfill the research purpose, 9 female scientists who were awarded major prizes in the field of science were interviewed in-depth from April to August, 2007. In-depth interview lasted around 90mins at their office or laboratory. Interview content was analyzed through initial coding, in-depth coding and theme generation. Results showed that consideration and decision, discovery of mathematics and science aptitude, passion and persistence for academics, and planning life as individual characteristics affected expertise development. The positive environmental factors of expertise development include academic, autonomous, progressive family atmosphere, experience of science, higher education and mentor in life. The negative environmental factors were career interruption due to marriage and child rearing and minority experience. They employed individual strategies to overcome negative environmental factors. According to the results,, educational and policy implications for nurturing female scientists were discussed.

keywords: talented female scientists, expertise, expertise development, female role model, career interruption, 여성과학자, 전문성, 전문성 발달, 여성 역할모델, 경력 단절

Reference

교육인적자원부 (2007). 교육통계연보 http:// cesi.kedi.re.kr/index.jsp

과학기술부 (2007). 여성과학기술인관련 통계. http://www.most.go.kr/pub/bbs/pds/list.do?mid=woman_2

과학기술부 (2005). 여성과학기술인의 생애주기적 육성․지원을 위한 정책분석모델 개발.

곽삼근, 조혜선, 윤혜경 (2005). 생애주기별 성역할 발달 및 갈등. 한국여성학, 21(2), 147-179.

김영천 (2006). 질적연구방법론 I. 문음사.

김혜숙, 이선이, 윤소연, 김영래, 김호섭 (2005). 대학의 여성 리더: 남녀 교수의 리더십 자기 지각 비교. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 10(3), 293-319.

민경숙 (2002). 두 여성 과학자의 반란: 과학과 젠더-이블린 팍스 켈러와 다나 해러웨이를 중심으로- 인문사회론총, 8, 101- 121.

손승영 (2005). 고학력 전문직 여성의 노동 경험과 딜레마: 강한 직업정체성과 남성중심적 조직문화. 한국여성학, 21(3), 67-97.

오헌석 (2006). 전문성 개발과정 및 핵심요인에 관한 연구. 직업능력개발연구, 9(2), 193-216.

10.

오헌석, 최지영, 최윤미, 권귀헌 (2007). 과학인재의 성장 및 전문성 발달과정에서의 영향 요인에 관한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지. 27(9), 907-918.

11.

윤진 (2001). 과학 관련 진로 선택 요인들의 분석. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

12.

윤진 (2002). 초․중․고 학생들의 과학 관련 진로 선택 요인. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(4), 906-921.

13.

이혜숙, 최경희, 이재경, 마경희, 이기순 (2005). 직업인으로서의 과학기술자 및 여성 과학기술자, 그리고 역할모델에 대한 중․고등학생들의 인식 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(2), 184-196.

14.

장경애 (2004). 과학자들의 진로선택과정에서 나타난 부각요인. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1131-1142.

15.

정경아, 최윤정, 윤초희, 이미순 (2006). 영재교육 성별 실태 및 영재 여학생 육성방안. 한국여성개발원.

16.

한국여성과학기술단체총연합회 (2005). 여성, 과학을 만나다. 양문

17.

한국여성과학기술단체총연합회 (2006). 여성, 과학의 중심에 서다. 양문

18.

한경혜, 김진희 (2003). 일․가족 상호작용에서의 성별 차이: 전이 개념을 중심으로. 한국사회학, 37(3), 57-81.

19.

한기순 (2004). 제 14장 미성취․여성․장애 영재. 박성익 외. 영재교육학원론. 교육과학사.

20.

de Groot, A. (1978). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

21.

Dreyfus, H. L., Athanasiou, T., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. NY: Basil Blackwell.

22.

Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and Crisis. NY: W.W. Norton.

23.

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.

24.

Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise. MA: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Evans, M. A., Whigham, M., & Wang, M. C. (1995). The effect of role model project upon the attitudes of ninth-grade science students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 195-204.

26.

Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in child development. NJ: Ablex.

27.

Feldman, D. H. (1995). “Learning an development in nonuniversal theory”, Human Development, 38, 315-321.

28.

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating Minds. New York: Basic Books.

29.

Gardner, H. (1996). Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership, Perseus Books Group (이종인 역, 20세기를 움직인 11인의 휴먼파워, 살림, 1997).

30.

Gardner, H. (1998). Extraordinary Minds. New York: Basic Books.

31.

Harmon, P. & King, D. (1986). Expert Systems: Artificial Intelligence in Business, New York: John Wiley.

32.

Hébert, T. P., & Olenchak, F. R. (2000). “Mentors for gifted underachieving males: Developing potential and realizing promise”, Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 196-207.

33.

Herling, R. E. (1998). "Expertise: The development of an operational definition for human resource development". In R. J. Torraco (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development Proceedings. CA: Academy of Human Resource Development. 715-722.

34.

Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal. 35(4), 681-704.

35.

Kochevar, L. K. (1994). Generativity of Expertise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

36.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.

37.

Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity; The Science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

38.

Simon, H. A., & Chase, R. A. (1973). “Skill in chess”. American Scientist, 61, 394-403.

39.

Simon, J. (1995). Gender, multiple roles, role meaning, and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 182-194.

40.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.

41.

Solomon, B. (2004). ““Memes,” “Genes” and “scenes”: A comparison of vereran professionals working in journalism, genetics, and theatre”. Goodwork Project Report Series, 30.

42.

Swanson, R. A, & Holton III, E. F. (2001). “The Nature of Human Expertise”, Foundations of Human Resource Development, CA: Berrett- Koehler Publishers.

43.

Young, D. J., Fraser, B. J., & Woolnough, B. E. (1997). Factors affecting student career choice in science: An Australian study of rural and urban schools. Research in Science Education, 27(2), 195-214.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.13 No.2

Female Scientists' Expertise Development: Individual & Environmental Factors

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology