Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.29)
- 2023 (Vol.28)
- 2022 (Vol.27)
- 2021 (Vol.26)
- 2020 (Vol.25)
- 2019 (Vol.24)
- 2018 (Vol.23)
- 2017 (Vol.22)
- 2016 (Vol.21)
- 2015 (Vol.20)
- 2014 (Vol.19)
- 2013 (Vol.18)
- 2012 (Vol.17)
- 2011 (Vol.16)
- 2010 (Vol.15)
- 2009 (Vol.14)
- 2008 (Vol.13)
- 2007 (Vol.12)
- 2006 (Vol.11)
- 2005 (Vol.10)
- 2004 (Vol.9)
- 2003 (Vol.8)
- 2002 (Vol.7)
- 2001 (Vol.6)
- 2000 (Vol.5)
- 1999 (Vol.4)
- 1998 (Vol.3)
- 1997 (Vol.2)
- 1996 (Vol.1)
Roles of autonomy and conflict management strategy in the relation between the contentment of psychological needs and the satisfaction with romantic relationship
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find out the differences according to gender in the relation among variables based on the self-determination theory. We investigated (a) if there would be differences according to gender in the degree of the contentment of psychological needs, autonomy, conflict management strategy, and satisfaction with romantic relationship, (b) if autonomy and conflict management strategy would mediate the relation between the contentment of psychological needs and satisfaction with romantic relationship, (c) if there would be differences according to gender in the mediation roles. Three hundred sixty one University students (male 165, female 196) were participated in this study. As a result, (a) the contentment of relation psychological need, negativity and negative emotion expression showed high score for female than for male, (b) autonomy and conflict management strategy mediated the relation between the contentment of psychological needs and satisfaction with romantic relationship, (c) autonomy and conflict management strategy mediated the relation between the contentment of psychological needs and satisfaction with romantic relationship in both male and female participants. The positive emotion expression among conflict management strategy was the only mediation variable for male, whereas not only the positive emotion expression but also negative emotion expression and negativity were the mediation variables for female. These results empirically conformed the self-determination theory, and gave the available knowledge about the differences according to gender in romantic relationship.
- keywords
- 이성 관계, 자기결정성, 내재적 동기, 갈등해결전략, 심리적 욕구충족, 관계만족, 성차, satisfaction with romantic relationship, self-determination, intrinsic motivation, conflict management strategy, psychological needs
Reference
김나리 (2002). 대학생의 이성 관계에서 애착이 갈등해결전략에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
김주환, 김은주, 홍세희 (2006). 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향. 교육심리연구, 20, 243-264.
설기문 (1993). 우리나라 대학상담의 이론적 모형-청소년 상담 이론 모형의 모색. 한양대학교 학생생활연구소, 1-38.
유소영 (2000). 사랑요소의 지각된 불일치와 책임귀인양식에 다른 이성관계 만족도. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
이경성 (2004). 친밀한 이성 관계에서 성격이 관계만족 및 개입에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 9, 131-150.
이경성, 한덕웅 (2005). 친밀한 이성관계에서 이상과 현재의 차이가 관계만족에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19, 163-184.
정태연, 최상진, 강진경 (2000). 성인기 애착 특성과 낭만적 사랑 및 성격특성과의 관계: 성차를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 5, 85-102.
최순남 (1989). 대학생의 이성의식에 관한 조사연구-한신대학생을 중심으로. 한신대학교 학생생활연구, 제2호, 31-67.
한소영, 신희천 (2006). 커플 기본심리적 욕구 중요성 척도의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 18(4), 817-835.
한소영, 신희천 (2007). 커플 기본 심리적 욕구 중요성 척도의 다집단 요인분석과 잠재평균분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 19(2), 447-465.
허선이 (2005). 대학생의 이성관계에서 의사소통유형에 따른 애착 및 갈등해결전략의 차이. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
홍대식 (2002). 데이트관계의 만족과 몰입에 관련된 특징들. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 10(2), 81-110.
Arellano, C., & Markman, H. (1995). The Managing Affect and Differences Scale (MADS): A self-report measure assessing conflict management in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 319-334.
Bahr, S. J. (1989). Family Interaction. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Cancian, F. M. (1985). Love and power in the private and public spheres. In Skolnick, A. S., & Skolinick, J.H.(ed), Family in transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Cancian, F., & Gordon, S. L. (1988). Changing emotional norms in marriage: Love and anger in U.S. women's magazines since 1900. Gender and Society, 2, 308-342.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Gilligand, C. C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hodgins, H., & Knee, C. R. (2002). The integrating self and conscious experience. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research(p. 87-100). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Knee, C. R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N. A., Nanayakkara, A., & Neighbors, C. (2002). Self-determination as growth motivation in romantic relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 609-619.
Knee, C. R., Lonsbary, C., Canevello, A. & Patrick, H. (2005). Self-Determination and conflict in Romantic Relationships. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 89(6), 997-1009.
Levinson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1985). Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 85-94.
Loyd, S. A., & Cate, R. M. (1985). The developmental course of conflict in dissolution premarital relationships. Journal of Social and personal Relationships, 2, 755-773.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
Rubin, L. B. (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and woman together. New York: Harper & Row.
Surra, C. A., & Longstreth, M. (1990). Similarity of outcomes, interdependence, and conflict in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 501-516.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations